Convicted pedophile Jeffrey Epstein dead

a reply to: Shamrock6
Never mind who it is. It's sad news. Rip

a reply to: Shamrock6

You never noticed Epstein had an outsized dome? How could you miss it?

Not like that. Why does it look way too large in only one of the pics.

a reply to: UpForGrabs

It doesn’t.

a reply to: chr0naut

How do you explain a woman who could make millions
suing The Daily Mail easily not doing so?

What logic is there in looking at a dismissed lawsuit based on lies,
when there is current evidence to show that high powered
people were involved in sex trafficking underage girls?

well she did step down
theslot.jezebel.com...
i.kinja-img.com...

www.pbs.org...

originally posted by: Phage

Here?

Not often.

Yet your aware there is evidence supporting a
conspiracy, and you can't factor that in?

a reply to: burntheships

The only evidence available to us at this point is that Epstein is dead.

Of course, there are some who speculate that is not the case as well.

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: burntheships

The only evidence available to us at this point is that Epstein is dead.

Except that there is evidence that authorities have collected,
enough for an indictment that carried conspiracy possibilities.

a reply to: burntheships

Right.

So, let's speculate the hell out of his death. I understand that.

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: burntheships

Right.

So, let's speculate the hell out of his death. I understand that.

Well, it is not unfounded speculation.

So ...

Not usually one to pop my head out of the ufo pulpit, but this story is so dodgy it's unreal.

Weren't the guards called off for "cell maintenance", now isn't this all a bit TOO obvious and blatant?

originally posted by: SouthernGift

originally posted by: Nothin

originally posted by: loam
a reply to: SouthernGift

It's a facet of Twitter's manipulation I was not aware of before.

Check... what we see as tending isn't really true.

Yes.
Then extend that to everything.
Nothing is as it seems.

I was just about to reply that I wish I could say Twitter was one of the tools I’ve been using in my research into this theory.
But it’s not
It is the entire internet world.

It is like a looking glass into the unseen world, once you have a little bit of a grasp on what you’re seeing/experiencing.

Perhaps we are at the crossroads where they are trying to merge? All eyes are on this, and all eyes are seeing something different, so it seems.

Enjoyed this, and your earlier comments.
Always nice to meet folks with a deeper sense of perception, and objective observation.

There is bias in the media, and that is nothing new for ATS members.
But it appears that looking at an issue, or subject, from multiple angles, is not an easy enterprise.
Perhaps it is continuing to question our own confirmation bias, that is the most odd, and challenging aspect?
Seems to me that this objective observation is an excellent way to glimpse the attempts at manipulation, or at the very least: sloppy or incompetent institutional communications?

Have you considered that this may have existed, in other domains, since before the electronic media, or perhaps even all media, back to the first time one of us intentionally, or incompetently, miscommunicated?

Then we look back at this whole Epstein mess...
Who could be sure to find any flavor of truth, amidst such enduring obfuscation?

Guys/Gals - have you seen this yet?
I copied this off a post made on my FB page by someone, supposedly this appears to be an ANON from inside:



I dunno if that's been shared yet because I haven't read the last 15 or so pages of this thread.

1) claims no nurses saw him
2) says van with military guy came
3) claims it looks like a Switch (?)

a reply to: muzzleflash

I did see this yesterday, but with like much that we are reading, it's hard to tell what is is likely true still.

I dunno who the person is that posted this photo, I have 100s of ppl on my F-list that I don't know. I tried to purge my F-list a few times but there's some weird bugs in FB that makes it where my "friends" numbers never change no matter how many ppl I remove. I think I have a few thousand friends but it always says "303" friends even if I remove hundreds of them...

Have you guys seen this or heard about this Anon claim yet?

a reply to: loam

Oh ok, so it's been making the rounds already?
Alright, just making sure.

Oh well, back to doing research for my new thread which will be very shocking.
It has nothing to do with any of this, it's actually far more important than anything Epstein related in terms of humanity.

Just seen Trumps retweets regarding the Clintons being involved.

I know he isn't perfect but you have to admire his balls.

Never thought i'd find a politician funny. I don't live in the USA so can't comment on his policies or state of play over there but i can say he's the only president in my lifetime that i genuinely think makes his own choices and isn't a puppet for the elite special interests.

a reply to: loam

I haven't really been keeping up with this the last day. I participated in the thread up till page 20-ish then went and slept 10 hours and then watched a movie and checked a few messages, replied, and went back to sleep for 4 more hours then got up this morning before sunrise and have been doing research for my next thread + watched some stuff on netflix and am too tired to post my thread so will try later tonight after I wake up again.

Point being I've been outta the loop on all things Epstein related so didn't know if that screenshot was old news or not. If you look it says 7:33 am yesterday, so it had to have been posted really early on in this whole ordeal. Surprisingly early on actually, so early on that it makes me wonder who could have been clever enough to fake it. It could be fake but you never know till you see evidence...

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: burntheships

Right.

So, let's speculate the hell out of his death. I understand that.

A guy who's lawyer kept saying him and his client were fear for the latter's safety commits suicide...

Why would someone afraid for their life take it?

Shame? He never possessed it.

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: burntheships

Right.

So, let's speculate the hell out of his death. I understand that.

There's too many other things to speculate about.
I lose interest in 1 topic too fast and am all over the place usually jumping around.

If anyone figures out anything important about Epstein I'm sure ATS will make sure I find out one way or another. That opens up plenty of room for me to not think about this too much and I can focus on anything and everything else.

I also think that if you focus on negative things too much it's unhealthy for you mentally and physically. So it's best not to get too drawn in or obsessed with topics like this one. Notice how society focuses on negative things way more than positive ones? It's unhealthy.