Sheffield woman found with over 1,000 indecent images of children hauled before the court

I'm very disturbed by the increasing numbers of crimes committed by women being reported... including sexual and/or violent crimes. This is the most recent one I've seen:

Sheffield woman found with over 1,000 indecent images of children hauled before the court

Prosecutor, Carl Fitch, told Sheffield Crown Court that Prince, of Infirmary Road, Upperthorpe was interviewed by police shortly after the raid and made ‘full and frank admissions’.

“She said she had downloaded indecent images of children.

Just "indecent"? Apparently not... apparently much worse than just "indecent":

Analysis revealed Prince had downloaded a total of 1,191 indecent images of children, whose ages ranged between five and 13-years-old.

In total, Prince downloaded 108 Category A images – the most serious legal category, defined as content which shows children being raped, as well as 90 Category B images and 993 Category C images.

She also downloaded 53 images of ‘extreme pornography’ and 337 prohibited images of children, which the Crown Prosecution Service define as ‘non-photographic’ images.

This includes ‘cartoons, manga and drawings’.

Despite confessing to the crimes, the police dragged their feet processing the evidence, and the rest of the hearing/article are about the judge addressing this delay, and he will issue a sentence by Friday. So we don't know the punishment yet.

But this is just one of many disturbing cases reported being committed by women. A few more recent cases:
Woman Charged With Kicking Elderly Woman In The Face On Red Line Train
Woman attacks people with hammer outside KFC in shocking road rage video
Woman posed as teenage girl on Facebook to entice young boys to perform sex acts
Woman arrested over violent triple murder of lesbian couple and adopted son

Statistically speaking, it is far more likely that a violent and/or sexual crime is committed by a man than by a woman... like 90 to 98% more likely, depending on the specific crime.

And guess what. Every single one of the crimes above was also committed by a man. To be specific, committed by a man identifying as a "woman." But every single one of those crimes was initially reported as being committed by a woman... NOT a man identifying as a woman.

Now that you know these crimes by "women" were actually committed by men, has your perspective changed in any way? (I don't want to expand too much here, because I want to hear from others and what they think/experienced...)

Several months ago, an article addressing these linguistic gymnastics by Trans Activism was posted at Medium, and promptly taken down again:

Pronouns Are Royhypnol

They change our perception, lower our defences, make us react differently, alter the reality in front of us.

The author suggests the reader conduct an experiment, replacing female pronouns with appropriate male pronouns in these cases, and think about the difference perspective it gives us -- if any. I kinda conducted the experiment for all of us.

Is the author correct? Did your perspective/opinion change upon learning the true sex of the perp? If so, how did it change? What was/is your reaction?

a reply to: Boadicea

Now that you know these crimes by "women" were actually committed by men, has your perspective changed in any way?

No.
When you said this

I'm very disturbed by the increasing numbers of crimes committed by women being reported

My first thought was ,"I'm not." I know women commit truly bad crimes. I've seen it.

a reply to: scraedtosleep

What have you seen?

a reply to: Boadicea

I was surprised when I thought it was a biological female on first reading, but when you revealed it was by a trans woman, sadly, I wasn't surprised.
Fact is the overwhelming majority of sex criminals is, and always has been, carried out by people who were born biologically male.
Call a spade a spade, not an earth moving enabler I say.

a reply to: Boadicea

At least the report says that she was a he........
The time is coming where that will not be allowed and everyone will believe a woman did it

a reply to: Itisnowagain

I'm afraid to even talk about the things I've seen.

I've seen women kill people.
And yes they went to prison for it.

a reply to: scraedtosleep

My first thought was ,"I'm not." I know women commit truly bad crimes. I've seen it.

Yes, there have been some "truly bad crimes" committed by women, and it's sad you had to witness those crimes being committed. And I have seen an increase of such crimes, and I find it disturbing also. Something is making it happen, and I'd like to know what. So that we can stop it.

But that wasn't really my question or the topic of the OP. I guess you answered the question you wanted to answer.

a reply to: Boadicea

But, how can this be? We were told men pretending to be women didn't prey on children a couple of years ago when they were demanding invitations to use the same bathrooms as the young daughters of normal human beings. Were we lied to?

a reply to: Boadicea

Good points, if a guy identifies as women and wants to dress like one so be it, but it’s wrong for them to try to convince the rest of us they actually are women.

originally posted by: scraedtosleep
a reply to: Boadicea

Now that you know these crimes by "women" were actually committed by men, has your perspective changed in any way?

No.
When you said this

I'm very disturbed by the increasing numbers of crimes committed by women being reported

My first thought was ,"I'm not." I know women commit truly bad crimes. I've seen it.

Women have chosen to kill 1.5 Billion human beings worldwide in the just the past 30 years, so I'd almost argue that anyone claiming women are the more genteel gender are throwing up a red herring argument off the above link statistic alone.

My first thought was ,"I'm not." I know women commit truly bad crimes. I've seen it.
a reply to: scraedtosleep

The soul of a woman was created below ledzep

originally posted by: Silure
a reply to: Boadicea

I was surprised when I thought it was a biological female on first reading, but when you revealed it was by a trans woman, sadly, I wasn't surprised.

I knew before I read the article that it was really a man identifying as a woman, and I was actually glad that they did note in the article that he is transgender. That surprised me! (But pleasantly...)

Fact is the overwhelming majority of sex criminals is, and always has been, carried out by people who were born biologically male.
Call a spade a spade, not an earth moving enabler I say.

That is a fact, and probably will remain true, but with transgender identifying women being given testosterone to transition, I think we're going to see an increase in violent and sexual crimes by women as well. Like the Colorado high school shooter. If we fail to call that spade a spade, we cannot address the several and varied root causes of the violence, and it will only get worse.

It also, of course, provides cover for the disproportionately high number of men identifying as "women" who are violent sexual predators.

a reply to: Boadicea

Totally agree with your points
I knew some women bodybuilders back in the days before testing who took hormones, anger, rage, strength yes, all increased, many I would choose not to fight.
What confuses me with any biological male presenting as female after hormone treatment is why the sexual abuse thing still remains, if they are full of oestrogen then I would imagine that would balance it.
The whole thing makes my mind bottle sometimes so I keep it simple in my head, if someone is biologically male by birth then are definitely more likely to touch kids up, and if someone is presenting as male to me, I keep an eye on them more than if I was interacting with a known biological female.
Crazy world!

originally posted by: Itisnowagain
a reply to: Boadicea

At least the report says that she was a he........
The time is coming where that will not be allowed and everyone will believe a woman did it

You're right. Trans Activists and media organizations are already recommending and/or demanding that transgender status not be mentioned in new articles, as it is not "relevant."

But it might be very relevant, especially when police are looking for the perp. Or when asking the public for help. Imagine commissioning a police sketch artist and not including that information. It's rather ridiculous to withhold the most specific identifying feature from the description!

originally posted by: burdman30ott6
a reply to: Boadicea

But, how can this be? We were told men pretending to be women didn't prey on children a couple of years ago when they were demanding invitations to use the same bathrooms as the young daughters of normal human beings. Were we lied to?

That's exactly what we were told... given the information at hand, you pose an excellent question. One that we all need an answer to. And we won't get it by misidentifying the perps.

originally posted by: surfer_soul
a reply to: Boadicea

Good points, if a guy identifies as women and wants to dress like one so be it, but it’s wrong for them to try to convince the rest of us they actually are women.

And I think that's doubly true when that man trying to convince the rest of us that he's a woman is also committing sexual crimes against women with his male body.

originally posted by: Boadicea

originally posted by: burdman30ott6
a reply to: Boadicea

But, how can this be? We were told men pretending to be women didn't prey on children a couple of years ago when they were demanding invitations to use the same bathrooms as the young daughters of normal human beings. Were we lied to?

That's exactly what we were told... given the information at hand, you pose an excellent question. One that we all need an answer to. And we won't get it by misidentifying the perps.

We in the US are thankfully in a better position to reject this than the poor UK is. As I understand it, it is considered a crime in the UK to not actively coddle and participate in the mental illness that is at the heart of transgenderism. If a man in the UK says "I am a woman" then someone in the UK who is honest with themselves and refuses to lie to their own brain by referring to that man pretending to be a woman as "he" can be charged with a hate crime of misgendering... or, in other words, not placating the sickness of another. Thank God in the United States we can still call a man a man and a woman a woman without any consequences beyond a handful of hate mongers and fear pedalers calling us names and threatening us with little to nothing backing up their threats.

originally posted by: Silure
a reply to: Boadicea

Totally agree with your points

I knew some women bodybuilders back in the days before testing who took hormones, anger, rage, strength yes, all increased, many I would choose not to fight.

Thank you for sharing your firsthand experience. After the shooting in Colorado, I did some research to see if increased rage and anger was an issue for these women receiving cross-hormone therapy, but I only found anecdotal "evidence" for it. I suspect that this is another angle that Trans Activists want to avoid proper study and research because the answers won't be acceptable.

What confuses me with any biological male presenting as female after hormone treatment is why the sexual abuse thing still remains, if they are full of oestrogen then I would imagine that would balance it.

I don't exactly understand that either, but I have found a few possible reasons -- alone or in combination. Medically speaking, I know that under some conditions estrogen can convert to testosterone, and I know that high testosterone levels have been associated with autogynephilia type men identifying as women, so there may be something at play regarding how some bodies process or utilize or produce testosterone.

I also know that some/many men identifying as "women" play with their doses in order to achieve more feminine physical features, but not lose their sex drive/libido.

I would also think that this is an unintended consequence of addressing only the gender identity disorder and ignoring/neglecting other mental and emotional disorders. which are apparently not alleviated by estrogen!

The whole thing makes my mind bottle sometimes so I keep it simple in my head, if someone is biologically male by birth then are definitely more likely to touch kids up, and if someone is presenting as male to me, I keep an eye on them more than if I was interacting with a known biological female.
Crazy world!

That is the point the author of the "Pronouns are Rohypnol" article was making. As she stated, we instinctively know to watch and protect ourselves from men, because they are by far the greatest predators, and generally speaking have the greater physical size and brute strength -- a clear advantage! I just read this morning that --

...one in 20 teenage boys and adult men sexually abuse children, and an estimated one teenage girl or adult woman in every 3,300 females molests children."

The Abel and Harlow Child Molestation Prevention Study

I don't think this excludes men who identify as "women" and conditioning us to think so puts everyone in danger as they let their guard down.

a reply to: burdman30ott6

We in the US are thankfully in a better position to reject this than the poor UK is. As I understand it, it is considered a crime in the UK to not actively coddle and participate in the mental illness that is at the heart of transgenderism. If a man in the UK says "I am a woman" then someone in the UK who is honest with themselves and refuses to lie to their own brain by referring to that man pretending to be a woman as "he" can be charged with a hate crime of misgendering... or, in other words, not placating the sickness of another.

This is so true -- and so sad. I've watched how this insanity has progressed in the UK and Canada -- and Canada is even worse than the UK! -- and it's exactly what some want to happen here. Fortunately, it won't be as easy here, and we can learn from others' mistakes. And the women fighting and protesting and discussing and demanding to be heard are also a great inspiration!

Thank God in the United States we can still call a man a man and a woman a woman without any consequences beyond a handful of hate mongers and fear pedalers calling us names and threatening us with little to nothing backing up their threats.

Well, let's hope it stays that way. The Supreme Court has agreed to hear one case this year which will basically decide if bureaucrats (i.e., unelected officials) can re-define "women" to include men identifying as "women" for Title VII purposes specifically, but the ruling will essentially apply to all definitions for "woman" in the US Code.
I suspect the Supreme Court will rule according to original intent, and at the time it passed, absolutely no one was considering gender "identity" in any way!

We also have The Equality Act that Pelosi introduced this session, and would include gender "self identification," which allows anyone to change their gender on a whim, temporarily or permanently, for social life but not business life, anything and everything.

So there are very definite efforts to pass the Trans Agenda into law... In fact, I do believe that will be one of my next threads

Women commit crime. Sometimes violent and distasteful. Not sure it's an increase, but it's probably more reported.