Information of another spy sent by FBI into Trump campaign

a reply to: Grambler

Until we are in the streets, threatening to overturn the tables of the money changers and force this nation to grind to a halt, expect nothing more than hand gestures, incantations, smoke, and mirrors.

Its nice we know how bad it was. Its terrible I have no faith in our government. In particular after watching this ridiculous show over the last 3 years.

originally posted by: Peeple
a reply to: shooterbrody

I don't know but I think national security is an issue the president should get involved in.
They weren't sure, but it could have been a large scale issue. Imagine it would have turned out Trump works for Russia? Wouldn't you have wanted that somebody stopped him? Let's say it wasn't your hero, but some guy.
And nothing happened. All good. What do you want? A note and a basket?

I just want them to simply follow the rules.
Give the defensive briefing that they are supposed to instead of attempting to unseat a political rival.

oh and trump is in no way "my hero"
I think he is crass and classless. His only redeeming quality was that he was not hillary.
Had mueller found actual evidence to charge trump with any crime I believe he should have.
mueller chose not to.

Even those we find crass and classless are due the same protection under our law as those we admire.
That is my problem with this entire fiasco.
JUST ENFORCE OUR LAWS EQUALLY.
Why is that so hard?

a reply to: Grambler
If the Brits declined to comment as to whether they were involved or not.... What does that tell us?

They could have just said NO.

But they didn't.

originally posted by: IAMTAT
She was never supposed to lose.
Nobody was ever supposed to know.

” If that f – – – ing bastard wins, we all hang from nooses!"

- a former presidential candidate


the fbi said in texts there was no way she would lose, they wouldn't let it happen

a reply to: shooterbrody

But that does happen. Hillary was under investigation multiple times. And lots of others you never hear from because they're not that important.

originally posted by: shooterbrody

originally posted by: IAMTAT
She was never supposed to lose.
Nobody was ever supposed to know.

” If that f – – – ing bastard wins, we all hang from nooses!"

- a former presidential candidate


the fbi said in texts there was no way she would lose, they wouldn't let it happen

Followed by... "We''ll stop him."

But no bias there... right?

originally posted by: shooterbrody

originally posted by: IAMTAT
She was never supposed to lose.
Nobody was ever supposed to know.

” If that f – – – ing bastard wins, we all hang from nooses!"

- a former presidential candidate


the fbi said in texts there was no way she would lose, they wouldn't let it happen

Yet my reality check says it did happen. So someone further up the chain made a different call. Isn't that what matters?

a reply to: Peeple

It is not supposed to happen and because it does, does not make it ok.
Were there fisa warrants on hillary?
Anyone in hillarys camp charged with lying to leo's?

not even the same sport let alone in the same ballpark

those in power in the fbi/doj/cia went all out to select a president then to unseat the one the voters elected
if you cant see that now when even the nyt is publishing such there is no help for you

a reply to: Peeple

So someone further up the chain made a different call.

The voters are the ones that made the call that matters.
The other call that matters was when trump fired comey. Had he not done that this mess would not have ended.
What we will see now is all the dirt used to unseat whom the voters selected.

I don't know about you but I dont want anyone but the voters selecting my potus, or any other elected official for that matter.

a reply to: shooterbrody

Sorry but to me what actually happened is more important than the bs comment you made in the end.
If they would have selected and unseated someone I think I would have noticed.

a reply to: shooterbrody

That's just paranoid.

a reply to: Peeple

So even when the nyt tells us that agents were sent to entrap americans in foreign countries, americans investigated but not indicted for conspiring with russians I might add, you still deny it happened?
NO AMERICANS were indicted for anything related to helping any russians with anything associated with the 2016 election.
Even though the fbi/cia/doj all conspired to commit fraud on fisa courts to illegally spy on their political opposition?

wow

you dig up that statute making having questionable contacts illegal yet?

originally posted by: Peeple
a reply to: shooterbrody

That's just paranoid.

tell that to the nyt
lol

a reply to: shooterbrody

That's not what I was saying. I never denied there was an investigation.

a reply to: shooterbrody

You are paranoid because you think you know what will happen. Meanwhile in reality that's not what is going to happen.

a reply to: Peeple

So someone further up the chain made a different call.

No one other than Pete Strzok approved the origin of the investigation:

And I'm looking at a text that you sent to Special Agent Strzok:
Trump's not ever going to become President, right? Right?

And then the agent who originated this counterintelligence
investigation who is a point of contact, who drafted theinitiating
document responding: No, no, he's not. We'll stop it.

Ms. P_age_. Right. Well, so, that's a different sort of context,
which I'm happy to explain. The one thing I'll note, I just think it
might maybe alleviate some concern, the reason that Pete opened it is
that it was a Sunday. So the reason he's both the originator and like
the approver is because it was a Sunday, and so there's nobody around.

Lisa Page testimony

This is usually a two person process, but that was bypassed.

a reply to: Peeple

You are correct, Nothing will happen because of corruption in the Democratic party.

When Mrs Clinton was investigated, how many folks plead the 5th, how many folks got immunity.

When President Trump was investigated, how many people plead the 5th, How many people got Immunity

I honestly think you do know know, do you?

but you are OK with that

a reply to: thedigirati

I'm not, but I also don't know what these people were working on and neither do you. We can't compare that. Because Trump had people mostly working in the private sector.

a reply to: Grambler

Papadopolous goes into great detail about this spy in his book, and in this interview with Byron York. Looks like he was right.

He knew she was a spy from the get go: attractive, seductive, and asking all sorts of questions.

Papadopolous drunkenly told a hillary ally some Russian told him they may have dirt on Hillary.

Papadopolous says this never happened.

He also believes he was the patsy of the biggest case of political entrapment in American history.

originally posted by: rickymouse
This is way bigger than watergate ever was.

Yes, it goes back that far...



Hillary has become what she was initially fighting against and has set a new standard of victimhood by suffering from a social condition arising from the desire to be more wealthy or powerful....