It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Mandroid7
The state loves drunks.
Endless tax dollars, liquor licenses and it creates new criminals.
You will get plenty of gore stories like this to justify the millions raked in.
originally posted by: projectvxn
I believe in ZERO tolerance for DUI.
Wanna drive drunk and put everyone else in danger? 1st DUI gets your license revoked.
Second DUI gets you sent to jail for a year.
Third DUI it's 5 years. plus 10 years probation with weekly and random blood alcohol checks.
Do it after that and it's anywhere from 10 to 20 years in prison because you're obviously too stupid to get it.
originally posted by: Mandroid7
a reply to: opethPA
You are missing the whole point of my post.
Just like you are supposed to.
The court system and state are making bank creating criminals and selling permits to sell alcohol at the same time, and justifying it on the backs of dead bodies like this one.
Punishments should be severe AFTER a crime is commited.
originally posted by: generik
this just goes to show just how well laws work. yet gun control laws will stop people from being killed with guns? well i guess now since he should be going to jail for murder, he will actually stop driving. or wait a minute. i am forgetting that drunk people can not be expected to make informed and rational decisions about what they are doing, so should he even be held responsible for his decisions to drive drunk, since he was drunk at the time he decided to drive drunk? or does that only apply to women?