Mad Dog General Mattis Torches Bob Woodward For 'Fiction' Anti-Trump Book

a reply to: Xcalibur254

Not according to his own daughter.

And beside that, there are 5 other controversies,
which we have touched on only two.

www.politico.com...

I am not going to go over each one of these with you....

Your free to believe lies if you wish.

a reply to: DJW001

AND NOW THIS..

FASCINATING.

The Times’s Opinion desk has taken the rare step of publishing an anonymous Op-Ed essay.

We did so at the request of the author, a senior official in the Trump administration whose identity is known to us and whose job would be jeopardized by its disclosure.

www.nytimes.com...

And the OP ED

I Am Part of the Resistance Inside the Trump Administration

I work for the president but like-minded colleagues and I have vowed to thwart parts of his agenda and his worst inclinations.

To be clear, ours is not the popular “resistance” of the left. We want the administration to succeed and think that many of its policies have already made America safer and more prosperous.

But we believe our first duty is to this country, and the president continues to act in a manner that is detrimental to the health of our republic.

That is why many Trump appointees have vowed to do what we can to preserve our democratic institutions while thwarting Mr. Trump’s more misguided impulses until he is out of office.

The rest here:
www.nytimes.com...

a reply to: soberbacchus

Right on cue....LOL!

That is a big yawn...taken right out of Homeland.

Gee, these guys must think the world are fools....

This was all detailed out in Peter Strzok texts, where
they hatched a plan to make it look like Trump was
a wild card and needed to be controlled.

What you don't know is that Congress, the high
ranking members have all seen the complete sets
of texts, and Trump also.

a reply to: soberbacchus

More from a "Senior Trump Administration Official":

The root of the problem is the president’s amorality. Anyone who works with him knows he is not moored to any discernible first principles that guide his decision making.


Although he was elected as a Republican, the president shows little affinity for ideals long espoused by conservatives: free minds, free markets and free people. At best, he has invoked these ideals in scripted settings. At worst, he has attacked them outright.

In addition to his mass-marketing of the notion that the press is the “enemy of the people,” President Trump’s impulses are generally anti-trade and anti-democratic.

This isn’t the work of the so-called deep state. It’s the work of the steady state.

Given the instability many witnessed, there were early whispers within the cabinet of invoking the 25th Amendment, which would start a complex process for removing the president. But no one wanted to precipitate a constitutional crisis. So we will do what we can to steer the administration in the right direction until — one way or another — it’s over.

The whole article is well worth a read.

a reply to: burntheships

Is it crooked Hillary again this time? I bet it is.

a reply to: soberbacchus

I read it hours ago.

Its a big yawn and predicted to come out as part of the
insurance policy. Nellie Orh and her ham radio license,
etc. Here is a word for you....

Sedition.

It could equal jail time for someone, some nameless person
who maybe under surveillance. Give them enough rope and
they will hang themselves.

a reply to: burntheships

Soooo...

You think the Editorial Board and The New York Times agreed to fake an author and claim someone as a Senior Trump Administration Official and publish an Op-Ed by the fictional person they invented?

If not, what are you saying?

originally posted by: olaru12
a reply to: burntheships

Is it crooked Hillary again this time? I bet it is.

Nah, she is too busy fretting over losing Michigan.

It's probably Jame Comey Homey....

a reply to: burntheships

Uh huh.

Trump is going to start jailing people for sedition?

Is their some Tyrant Crush Weekly magazine you read that gets you all worked up and excited?

Why do Trump lovers always jump the shark and start fantasizing about locking people up that disagree with the orange oaf?

originally posted by: burntheships

originally posted by: olaru12
a reply to: burntheships

Is it crooked Hillary again this time? I bet it is.

Nah, she is too busy fretting over losing Michigan.

It's probably Jame Comey Homey....

Nope, Kelly Ann....wanna bet?

a reply to: soberbacchusThey

No need to "fake" an anyonymous source right?

Do you really think that people in the White House
are not under a close watch?

Here is a clue: Watch James Mattis watch Lindsey Graham
at John McCains Funeral.

Watch General Kelley watch Lindsey Graham there also...
and that is at McCains funeral.

a reply to: burntheships

Lindsay Graham is not a "Senior Trump Administration Official". He is a Senator

originally posted by: olaru12
Nope, Kelly Ann....wanna bet?

Could be, but no bet because I read it and
they had to hide a writing style.

So...that only leaves a handful of people,
I don't think it is her but could be.

originally posted by: soberbacchus
a reply to: burntheships

Lindsay Graham is not a "Senior Trump Administration Official". He is a Senator

To be clear, reread what I wrote.

I did not say that I think Lindsay Graham is the leaker....

I said if you think this so called white house mouse
is not under surveillance, your wrong.

You have fallen hook line and sinker for a lot of propaganda.

originally posted by: burntheships

originally posted by: olaru12
Nope, Kelly Ann....wanna bet?

Could be, but no bet because I read it and
they had to hide a writing style.

So...that only leaves a handful of people,
I don't think it is her but could be.

She is not a "Senior Trump Administration Official".
Not even an official.
She carries the title "counselor to the President"

originally posted by: burntheships

originally posted by: olaru12
Nope, Kelly Ann....wanna bet?

Could be, but no bet because I read it and
they had to hide a writing style.

So...that only leaves a handful of people,
I don't think it is her but could be.

Regardless of who it is, I'll bet that it precipitated a lot of screaming from the Oval Office.
The massive churn of people going into and out of the West Wing is now somewhat frightening. Who the hell would want to work there?

a reply to: soberbacchus

Could be, I am not a Trump Administration junkie....
haha.

I know the sub plot from the Peter Strzok Texts.

So lets play a game....for the sake of fun...lets
say this person really exists. Who do you think it is?

a reply to: burntheships

That really says nothing.

I don't think Trump is capable of "surveiling" anyone.

Not to say he isn't crazy paranoid and out of his head though.

Did you read this part of the Sen Trump Officials Op-Ed?

Given the instability many witnessed, there were early whispers within the cabinet of invoking the 25th Amendment, which would start a complex process for removing the president. But no one wanted to precipitate a constitutional crisis. So we will do what we can to steer the administration in the right direction until — one way or another — it’s over.

It doesn't matter how many people come out and say Trump is a poor leader, a ruthless boss, ineffectual, anti-trade, etc. etc. - his followers will support Trump to the end. 9/10ths of his entire administration could say the say thing, and his sheep will believe they are ALL liars, and that Trump, who we already know to be a pathological liar, is supposedly the one guy telling the truth.

It's sort of sad and hilarious at the same time.

originally posted by: soberbacchus
a reply to: burntheships

That really says nothing.

I don't think Trump is capable of "surveiling" anyone.

Ok, got it that is what you think.