It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
"To qualify, the general completed more than 50 hours in aircraft systems and avionics academics, received stealth-tactics training emphasizing integrated avionics and super cruise technology, and completed five simulator sessions and three Raptor flights."
“Every air force in the world is trying to figure out how to beat our Air Force,” General Jumper said. One of the ways to do that is through advanced surface-to-air missile systems.
"The Russians have built next-generation surface-to-air missiles that many nations in the world are now adding to their inventory, General Jumper said."
"The Raptor has the ability to dominate that airspace. So, it is not too early to get the Raptor out there, The Raptor will also ensure the safety of U.S. pilots against advanced adversary aircraft, General Jumper said.
”
"The Russians never got out of the fighter-building business. They are delivering aircraft to nations around the world that outperform anything else we have -- except the Raptor,”
Gen. John P. Jumper is Chief of Staff of the U.S. Air Force, Washington, D.C. As Chief, he serves as the senior uniformed Air Force officer responsible for the organization, training and equipage of more than 700,000 active-duty, Guard, Reserve and civilian forces serving in the United States and overseas. As a member of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, the general and other service chiefs function as military advisers to the Secretary of Defense, National Security Council and the President.
Originally posted by Teh_Gerbil
The next big tech leap is yet to come, I feel. And there's alot that can shoot down a Raptor out there. But it all depends on the guy flying the plane.
Case in Question, 3 WW1 Biplanes fending off the Luftwaffe in WW2.
Originally posted by tomcat ha
Am i the only one interested in that they admitted that russian planes are better?
Originally posted by intelgurl
Here's another update on the F/A-22:
"Pentagon Contract Announcement
(Source: US Department of Defense; issued Feb. 18, 2005)
Lockheed Martin Corp., Fort Worth, Texas, is being awarded a $414,364,104 firm fixed price contract.
This effort supports F/A-22 Lot 6 Production Advanced Buy for twenty-four (24) Lot 6 aircraft and associated equipment.
Total funds have been obligated. This work will be complete by October 2005."
Originally posted by skippytjc
Originally posted by intelgurl
Here's another update on the F/A-22:
"Pentagon Contract Announcement
(Source: US Department of Defense; issued Feb. 18, 2005)
Lockheed Martin Corp., Fort Worth, Texas, is being awarded a $414,364,104 firm fixed price contract.
This effort supports F/A-22 Lot 6 Production Advanced Buy for twenty-four (24) Lot 6 aircraft and associated equipment.
Total funds have been obligated. This work will be complete by October 2005."
Am I missing something here? My math shows thats $17,265,171 per plane. This a special deal?
Originally posted by GrOuNd_ZeRo
The Russians are close in becoming in par with the Raptor and won't stop until they are, the chinese are trying it and probably India too now.
I do think the US still needs the raptor and MORE IMPORTANTLY the new upgraded AMRAAM!
Originally posted by tomcat ha
Russia is on par with the F15's avionics.
Originally posted by Hockeyguy567
Originally posted by tomcat ha
Russia is on par with the F15's avionics.
Russia isn't even close, so don't compare.
Originally posted by Teh_Gerbil
Originally posted by Hockeyguy567
Originally posted by tomcat ha
Russia is on par with the F15's avionics.
Russia isn't even close, so don't compare.
Su-30 in US conducted trails beats the F-15.