Accepted and Believe what we tell you!

Just seen this on BBC news site!
Photos celebrate uplands country 'wow factor'

Its of Winning entries in a countryside photograph competition.
But the first two photos are So Conspiracies.
that you may laugh at the first two.

1, sunrise in the Peak District. look at the sky! is that chem trails?
2, paragliding over Mam Tor in Derbyshire.
a man paragliding ! ? um you can see the earth Is round. LOL.
and hes not wearing a space suit?

Yes believe ALL they tell you!
some believe that we live in a virtual reality ?
but can not believe that the earth may be flat.

the Church brainwash people with religion
and people believe all the scientific impossibilities in the bible.
um! god did miracles... yes that exsplanes it all.

MODS! you do know that the spell checker on this site can NOT spell?
I use Google to spell check. and your site says the spelling is wong!

a reply to: buddha
My dictionary agrees that "explains" is the correct spelling.
Whoever gave you "exsplanes" is not to be trusted, for future reference.

I am saying that people accept this kind of
thing and use it to believe what is normal.
you see Odd thins ALL the time and
dont thing any thing is Odd about it.
and use photos that are altered to reinforce beliefs in Odd things.

People NEED to question their reality a Lot more.
That Is what Scientist do! thats how the Find out things.
If they Did not do that you would not have all the New inventions you have.
from fire the wheel to smart phones and cars.

originally posted by: DISRAELI
a reply to: buddha
My dictionary agrees that "explains" is the correct spelling.
Whoever gave you "exsplanes" is not to be trusted, for future reference.

LO I love it!
a masive meteor could be minutes from hinting earth.
and you would site their telling me how to spell masive!

a reply to: buddha
I would not have bothered, but you yourself made a point of criticising the spell-checker. So I was just observing, as a matter of justice, that the spell-checker may have been right.

P.S. I would not "site". I would only sit.
And the word is "massive".

originally posted by: DISRAELI
a reply to: buddha
I would not have bothered, but you yourself made a point of criticising the spell-checker. So I was just observing, as a matter of justice, that the spell-checker may have been right.

P.S. I would not "site". I would only sit.
And the word is "massive".

You also would not sit "their" but you would sit "there" telling him what to spell....massive?

Here, your "Chemtrails" origin:
How to get to Peak District National Park from 5 nearby airports

originally posted by: DISRAELI
a reply to: buddha
P.S. I would not "site". I would only sit.
And the word is "massive".

Ummm...and I would never...cite...to sit on this site...

Non probable insight...in sight...




YouSir

So you want us to accept and believe what you tell us, instead of whoever wrote that article? They have much more credible grammar.

a reply to: buddha

You could always just learn how to spell, that works too.

a reply to: buddha

Now this thread is a typical example of why I
joined ATS.

originally posted by: buddha

2, paragliding over Mam Tor in Derbyshire.
a man paragliding ! ? um you can see the earth Is round. LOL.





MODS! you do know that the spell checker on this site can NOT spell?
I use Google to spell check. and your site says the spelling is wong!

if you think the curvature in that photo is the earths curve, then the earth is about 1000times smaller then you were taught in school...... you gotta be pretty 'not so smart' to not realize thats a fish eye lense....
also, you think paragliders need spacesuits? wtf? 'not so smart' confirmed.


btw spellcheckers are not apart of the website, they are apart of your browser....