Senators Suspect Comey Lied and Plotted to Double-Cross Trump, Seek Second Special Counsel

originally posted by: Ksihkehe
Tptb seem to be completely untouchable. If Trump can't break this system we're likely a lost cause.

Right now they definitely have a stonghold with the
Special Counsel, as we have seen no collusion with
Russia but they keep expanding the probe.

I don't see Trump backing down, looks like this
is heading for a showdown.

originally posted by: burntheships

originally posted by: Ksihkehe
Tptb seem to be completely untouchable. If Trump can't break this system we're likely a lost cause.

Right now they definitely have a stonghold with the
Special Counsel, as we have seen no collusion with
Russia but they keep expanding the probe.

I don't see Trump backing down, looks like this
is heading for a showdown.

You mean that they have not released the final report yet right.

It is true WE have not seen the proof yet.

Does not mean they don't have it.

Or are you saying there is no proof at all?

a reply to: burntheships

And your assertion is based on hard facts, or what you 'feel' is true?

Just curious.

a reply to: ketsuko

Mueller is quite methodical. These sources however are a joke.

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: ketsuko

Mueller is quite methodical. These sources however are a joke.

Sure.



She's eating her own lips.

a reply to: DogStarIn1066

Yes, Carter Page went to Russia. That was verified. Other than that, not a sausage.

a reply to: burgerbuddy

Like I said...
Hey burger dude... Call me when you get a clue.

originally posted by: Sillyolme
Mueller is quite methodical.

And a good record of boondoggles too 🙄

originally posted by: DogStarIn1066

originally posted by: burntheships

originally posted by: Ksihkehe
Tptb seem to be completely untouchable. If Trump can't break this system we're likely a lost cause.

Right now they definitely have a stonghold with the
Special Counsel, as we have seen no collusion with
Russia but they keep expanding the probe.

I don't see Trump backing down, looks like this
is heading for a showdown.

You mean that they have not released the final report yet right.

It is true WE have not seen the proof yet.

Does not mean they don't have it.

Or are you saying there is no proof at all?

Bring it.


they got nothing.

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: burgerbuddy

Like I said...
Hey burger dude... Call me when you get a clue.

None of u guys remember huma's emails on her pervs laptop?

That's messed up and against the law.

Mccabe was in charge of that, comey was the boss at the time.

Look into mueller when he was in Boston.

originally posted by: DogStarIn1066
Unverified at the time. Some, much in fact, has been independently verified.

You know which parts, and if you don't, please do your dillegence.I

I don't think you want to detail your thread with that discussion.

Grambler's question was pretty simple.

So go on, tell me what of consequence, that proves some sort of criminality alleged in the dossier has been confirmed true.

It is not off-topic for you to back up what you have said. So if you could please back up what you have said then maybe everyone here wont be reading your post thinking "you have nothing".

Lot of stuff here. Maybe needs several new threads. Or you might get called out for the dreaded "off topic" or heretical "whataboutism". I had to spend almost an entire thread calling Trump "he who must not be named" to avoid that charge. The thread in question had Trumps name in it, so you can never be too careful about the "whatabout" charge.

Because that's certainly what it looks like when you try to avoid such a simple question in this manner.

a reply to: Grambler

No special counsel yet, but there is a full-scale FBI investigation going on right now into the Clintons. You just wouldn't know it from the media silence on it.

In terms of Comey, he is basically screwed IF Sessions decides to take him down. He lied under oath.

Authorized leaking is called propaganda and it is legal.

The current is doing the same as the former.

originally posted by: Leonidas
a reply to: burntheships

Read "New Lies For Old" by Golitsyn and get back to us, sport.

Expound a bit if you would.

How does this apply to James Comey?

originally posted by: Sillyolme
These sources however are a joke.

There is no higher authority than Congress.

Not even Special Counsel, and he could be fired
or cut loose by POTUS and Congress.

originally posted by: howtonhawky
Authorized leaking is called propaganda and it is legal.

The current is doing the same as the former.

Lying under oath is what we are talking about here,
not leaking.

originally posted by: burntheships

originally posted by: Sillyolme
These sources however are a joke.

There is no higher authority than Congress.

Not even Special Counsel, and he could be fired
or cut loose by POTUS and Congress.

There are 3 co-equal branches. At least on paper, anyway.

Good interview from James Kallstrom.

originally posted by: DogStarIn1066

There are 3 co-equal branches. At least on paper, anyway.

Congress has oversight authority.

Hence the Oversight Committees.

FBI and DOJ are not powers unto themselves.

originally posted by: burntheships

originally posted by: DogStarIn1066

There are 3 co-equal branches. At least on paper, anyway.

Congress has oversight authority.

Hence the Oversight Committees.

FBI and DOJ are not powers unto themselves.

Not trying to start a fight. You are correct above, but FBI and DOJ are under the executive. Congress controls funding, so they can do oversight.