It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: kurthall
originally posted by: kurthall
originally posted by: Thirty6BelowZero
originally posted by: Wayfarer
originally posted by: whywhynot
So there are a couple nice threads running on the recent Mueller indictments but am I confused. Doesn’t a Federal Grand Jury indictment commonly result in the arrest of the person indicted?
I read the current articles in the MSM, googled for “arrested indicted Russians” and read through the ATS threads and I find nothing about arrests. And, don’t the Feds keep the indictments quit until the people are arrested to prevent them from fleeing?
Makes me wonder if these guys are currently in Russia and if so there is zip chance of getting them to the USA. And, if that is true it makes me wonder about the true value of this indictment.
Am I missing something?
Your latter musings are correct. Those named are in Russia, and will never travel to the US (or likely any of our close allies) again for fear of extradition. The value is in setting the precedent that Russia did in fact willfully work to affect the outcome of the 2016 election.
Well they failed because Hillary lost.
They were PRO TRUMP anti Hillary, stop spreading false information!
That is what the FBI said, stop changing things around to be pro trump! Its ridiculous! The freaking Russians wanted Trump to win. Why do you think Trump STILL has not signed the sanctions against Russia he has had for two weeks????? Let me guess you think it's coincidence???
originally posted by: BEBOG
Independent third parties is the current talk and a good one... instead of letting political parties draw those maps themselves. No taxation without representation... since people are STILL taxed both federal and state level depending on whom they work for? Including those not working for state or federal paying BOTH... there is no equal representation going on at all in those states.
We saw that very clearly in the last presidential election... so the fixing....
originally posted by: kurthall
originally posted by: Thirty6BelowZero
originally posted by: Wayfarer
originally posted by: whywhynot
So there are a couple nice threads running on the recent Mueller indictments but am I confused. Doesn’t a Federal Grand Jury indictment commonly result in the arrest of the person indicted?
I read the current articles in the MSM, googled for “arrested indicted Russians” and read through the ATS threads and I find nothing about arrests. And, don’t the Feds keep the indictments quit until the people are arrested to prevent them from fleeing?
Makes me wonder if these guys are currently in Russia and if so there is zip chance of getting them to the USA. And, if that is true it makes me wonder about the true value of this indictment.
Am I missing something?
Your latter musings are correct. Those named are in Russia, and will never travel to the US (or likely any of our close allies) again for fear of extradition. The value is in setting the precedent that Russia did in fact willfully work to affect the outcome of the 2016 election.
Well they failed because Hillary lost.
They were PRO TRUMP anti Hillary, stop spreading false information!
originally posted by: Middleoftheroad
originally posted by: kurthall
originally posted by: kurthall
originally posted by: Thirty6BelowZero
originally posted by: Wayfarer
originally posted by: whywhynot
So there are a couple nice threads running on the recent Mueller indictments but am I confused. Doesn’t a Federal Grand Jury indictment commonly result in the arrest of the person indicted?
I read the current articles in the MSM, googled for “arrested indicted Russians” and read through the ATS threads and I find nothing about arrests. And, don’t the Feds keep the indictments quit until the people are arrested to prevent them from fleeing?
Makes me wonder if these guys are currently in Russia and if so there is zip chance of getting them to the USA. And, if that is true it makes me wonder about the true value of this indictment.
Am I missing something?
Your latter musings are correct. Those named are in Russia, and will never travel to the US (or likely any of our close allies) again for fear of extradition. The value is in setting the precedent that Russia did in fact willfully work to affect the outcome of the 2016 election.
Well they failed because Hillary lost.
They were PRO TRUMP anti Hillary, stop spreading false information!
That is what the FBI said, stop changing things around to be pro trump! Its ridiculous! The freaking Russians wanted Trump to win. Why do you think Trump STILL has not signed the sanctions against Russia he has had for two weeks????? Let me guess you think it's coincidence???
They also wanted Bernie to win, so why didn't he win if the Russians had so much influence?
originally posted by: kurthall
originally posted by: Middleoftheroad
originally posted by: kurthall
originally posted by: kurthall
originally posted by: Thirty6BelowZero
originally posted by: Wayfarer
originally posted by: whywhynot
So there are a couple nice threads running on the recent Mueller indictments but am I confused. Doesn’t a Federal Grand Jury indictment commonly result in the arrest of the person indicted?
I read the current articles in the MSM, googled for “arrested indicted Russians” and read through the ATS threads and I find nothing about arrests. And, don’t the Feds keep the indictments quit until the people are arrested to prevent them from fleeing?
Makes me wonder if these guys are currently in Russia and if so there is zip chance of getting them to the USA. And, if that is true it makes me wonder about the true value of this indictment.
Am I missing something?
Your latter musings are correct. Those named are in Russia, and will never travel to the US (or likely any of our close allies) again for fear of extradition. The value is in setting the precedent that Russia did in fact willfully work to affect the outcome of the 2016 election.
Well they failed because Hillary lost.
They were PRO TRUMP anti Hillary, stop spreading false information!
That is what the FBI said, stop changing things around to be pro trump! Its ridiculous! The freaking Russians wanted Trump to win. Why do you think Trump STILL has not signed the sanctions against Russia he has had for two weeks????? Let me guess you think it's coincidence???
They also wanted Bernie to win, so why didn't he win if the Russians had so much influence?
Where is your proof they wanted Bernie to win????? Plenty of proof they wanted Trump to win....not Bernie.
It's pretty well known Russia in no way wanted Hillary to win....
originally posted by: Mach2
They did not care who won. Their objective was to sow discord among the American population. Period. By being blinded by party politics.....
originally posted by: whywhynot
Am I missing something?
originally posted by: Wayfarer
originally posted by: whywhynot
So there are a couple nice threads running on the recent Mueller indictments but am I confused. Doesn’t a Federal Grand Jury indictment commonly result in the arrest of the person indicted?
I read the current articles in the MSM, googled for “arrested indicted Russians” and read through the ATS threads and I find nothing about arrests. And, don’t the Feds keep the indictments quit until the people are arrested to prevent them from fleeing?
Makes me wonder if these guys are currently in Russia and if so there is zip chance of getting them to the USA. And, if that is true it makes me wonder about the true value of this indictment.
Am I missing something?
Your latter musings are correct. Those named are in Russia, and will never travel to the US (or likely any of our close allies) again for fear of extradition. The value is in setting the precedent that Russia did in fact willfully work to affect the outcome of the 2016 election.
originally posted by: kurthall
originally posted by: Middleoftheroad
originally posted by: kurthall
originally posted by: kurthall
originally posted by: Thirty6BelowZero
originally posted by: Wayfarer
originally posted by: whywhynot
So there are a couple nice threads running on the recent Mueller indictments but am I confused. Doesn’t a Federal Grand Jury indictment commonly result in the arrest of the person indicted?
I read the current articles in the MSM, googled for “arrested indicted Russians” and read through the ATS threads and I find nothing about arrests. And, don’t the Feds keep the indictments quit until the people are arrested to prevent them from fleeing?
Makes me wonder if these guys are currently in Russia and if so there is zip chance of getting them to the USA. And, if that is true it makes me wonder about the true value of this indictment.
Am I missing something?
Your latter musings are correct. Those named are in Russia, and will never travel to the US (or likely any of our close allies) again for fear of extradition. The value is in setting the precedent that Russia did in fact willfully work to affect the outcome of the 2016 election.
Well they failed because Hillary lost.
They were PRO TRUMP anti Hillary, stop spreading false information!
That is what the FBI said, stop changing things around to be pro trump! Its ridiculous! The freaking Russians wanted Trump to win. Why do you think Trump STILL has not signed the sanctions against Russia he has had for two weeks????? Let me guess you think it's coincidence???
They also wanted Bernie to win, so why didn't he win if the Russians had so much influence?
Where is your proof they wanted Bernie to win????? Plenty of proof they wanted Trump to win....not Bernie.
It's pretty well known Russia in no way wanted Hillary to win....
originally posted by: smurfy
originally posted by: Mach2
They did not care who won. Their objective was to sow discord among the American population. Period. By being blinded by party politics.....
You left out , "With Trump's help", I think it is yourself who is blinded, or just making stuff up...Trump has sown plenty of discord on his own....."If you can hear me Russia" ...just as well for him there isn't a real war on with Russia.
originally posted by: UKTruth
originally posted by: Wayfarer
originally posted by: whywhynot
So there are a couple nice threads running on the recent Mueller indictments but am I confused. Doesn’t a Federal Grand Jury indictment commonly result in the arrest of the person indicted?
I read the current articles in the MSM, googled for “arrested indicted Russians” and read through the ATS threads and I find nothing about arrests. And, don’t the Feds keep the indictments quit until the people are arrested to prevent them from fleeing?
Makes me wonder if these guys are currently in Russia and if so there is zip chance of getting them to the USA. And, if that is true it makes me wonder about the true value of this indictment.
Am I missing something?
Your latter musings are correct. Those named are in Russia, and will never travel to the US (or likely any of our close allies) again for fear of extradition. The value is in setting the precedent that Russia did in fact willfully work to affect the outcome of the 2016 election.
Eh? Where does it say Russia wilfully worked to effect the outcome of the 2016 election????
Are these 13 people members of a reformed Polit Bureau or something????
originally posted by: whywhynot
originally posted by: UKTruth
originally posted by: Wayfarer
originally posted by: whywhynot
So there are a couple nice threads running on the recent Mueller indictments but am I confused. Doesn’t a Federal Grand Jury indictment commonly result in the arrest of the person indicted?
I read the current articles in the MSM, googled for “arrested indicted Russians” and read through the ATS threads and I find nothing about arrests. And, don’t the Feds keep the indictments quit until the people are arrested to prevent them from fleeing?
Makes me wonder if these guys are currently in Russia and if so there is zip chance of getting them to the USA. And, if that is true it makes me wonder about the true value of this indictment.
Am I missing something?
Your latter musings are correct. Those named are in Russia, and will never travel to the US (or likely any of our close allies) again for fear of extradition. The value is in setting the precedent that Russia did in fact willfully work to affect the outcome of the 2016 election.
Eh? Where does it say Russia wilfully worked to effect the outcome of the 2016 election????
Are these 13 people members of a reformed Polit Bureau or something????
The indictments and the press conference announcing them specifically answers your questions.
www.foxnews.com..." target="_blank" class="postlink" rel="nofollow">13 Russian nationals indicted for interfering in US electionswww.foxnews.com...
originally posted by: whywhynot
a reply to: UKTruth
You’re correct. What is not being very well defined IS the fine distinction between Russia the country, the Russian government and Russian citizens. Even Trump in his latest tweet (I wish he would stop that) calls out “Russia” not the Russian citizens that were indicted.
I understand the arguments on all sides. I just don’t think we know now or will ever be able to prove that the citizens worked at the behest of the government.