It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: madenusa
a reply to: ScepticScotI presumed we all new who the elite were...
its imposable to have proof but if you fallow the money trail,three country's are the only ones left.
originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
a reply to: madenusa
Either way, not true. This whole 'Rothschilds run the world' trope is kinda old at this point and no one can ever show me proof of how all these public banks shares are controlled by one family.
originally posted by: madenusa
its imposable to have proof but if you fallow the money trail,three country's are the only ones left.
originally posted by: madenusa
they print the money FOR the US Government, which pays them interest.
originally posted by: intrptr
a reply to: IgnoranceIsntBlisss
...but the people with all the real loot in the bank, their money goes up in value every year via "interest".
Interest on the dollars they printed, for pennies on the dollar.
The real criminals and the real loot...
image search
This means that if we would reset the nation’s debt today and would begin reprinting money, we would be in debt to the FED from the very first dollar loaned to our Government.
The only countries left in 2011 without a Central Bank owned or controlled by the elite are:
1.Cuba
2.North Korea
3.Iran
It is not a coincidence that these country's, are under attack by the media....
originally posted by: SkeptiSchism
a reply to: ScepticScot
Can you provide examples, like an article I can read where the author clearly shows in detail and from case example how it does not violate the constitution?
IMO it doesn't violate the constitution in that congress has the authority to regulate our money as I said defined in Article 1 Section 8, but congress just turned that authority to the banking system and does not 'manage' it, regulate it, or even pay much attention.
Primarily because they don't want to upset their magic 'money' tree, it allows them to deficit spend ad infinitum with the dubious and dangerous idea they can always inflate the debt away. Again, destroying millions of lives and saving in the process.
originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
originally posted by: SkeptiSchism
It hasn't been challenged because the only people capable of challenging it profit from it.
You seem to have a very limited knowledge of who the Supreme Court will listen to, any private citizen can get their case heard by the Supreme Court if they choose to accept it on its merits.
originally posted by: TruthxIsxInxThexMist
I've been thinking about this a long time now.
Bank CEO's/Banks and the Taxman.
How has this been going on for so long and how do they escape Prison time? Do they own the Courts and Judges or are the Courts and Judges just so ignorant of the fact?
First of all Money/Cash is something which can be printed forever or in todays Society something which can be digitally printed forever and it should be a prison sentence if you are lending people this cash which comes out of thin air and then asking for said people to repay that loan with interest. It's like being asked to pay gangsters to keep your business from burning down. They hold you to ransom and if you don't pay it, they take your property or put you inside for not paying your debts, a debt which is created out of thin air to make people suffer. They also don't offer much interest on your savings but charge you excess amounts!
It's also legal for one person or group to print money but not legal for other people to print as much as they want for themselves. Why and how do the Judges see this activity as different? What exactly is the difference?
Secondly... THE Taxman?
Why does he/she have any entitlement at all to something you do in your spare time as entertainment? I'm talking here about the lottery. Why should someone come along and put claim to a certain percent of your winnings? In this case I'm talking about 37% of your winnings on the big Mega lottery's and a smaller amount on other lottery's? You won it fair and square putting your hard earned cash into it, so you should take it all without having to pay anyone anything. Even on slot machines, you put the money in, not the taxman, so why do they get any of it?
Both of these institutions make money from doing NOTHING and they should be in prison for embezzelement or something similar.
EMBEZZELMENT MEANING: misappropriation · theft · stealing · robbing · robbery · thieving · pilfering · pilferage · appropriation · abstraction · swindling · white-collar crime · fraud
I've put this in 'Conspiracy' Forum because there is something going on here and has been going on for Millenia and we need answers.
originally posted by: intrptr
a reply to: IgnoranceIsntBlisss
...but the people with all the real loot in the bank, their money goes up in value every year via "interest".
Interest on the dollars they printed, for pennies on the dollar.
The real criminals and the real loot...
image search
originally posted by: SkeptiSchism
I wasn't aware I could stand in line for 100 years to get my case heard.
originally posted by: madenusa
JP Morgan Chase Bank of New York
So who then are the stockholders in these money center banks?
they are all in the same game "monopoly over the global economy"
originally posted by: seasonal
originally posted by: intrptr
a reply to: IgnoranceIsntBlisss
...but the people with all the real loot in the bank, their money goes up in value every year via "interest".
Interest on the dollars they printed, for pennies on the dollar.
The real criminals and the real loot...
image search
How dare you bring up the queen. She worked hard to be born.