It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: face23785
Wait so you've been hounding me to read the actual CBO report and then post a link to the Wall Street Journal? Can you say hypocrisy?
originally posted by: dragonridr
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: face23785
Wait so you've been hounding me to read the actual CBO report and then post a link to the Wall Street Journal? Can you say hypocrisy?
Here you go 1.5 trillion increase in 2027. Provided the economy stays at 1.9 percent. Though with the dow setting records that's unlikely.
www.cbo.gov...
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: face23785
Wait so you've been hounding me to read the actual CBO report and then post a link to the Wall Street Journal? Can you say hypocrisy?
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: face23785
Oh I know what the CBO report says. I just make a point of not researching other people's claims. If you are going to say something to me, then you best be ready to back it up with a source whether I already know it or not. In fact, if you had stopped being arrogant for JUST a second and posted the CBO report like I asked you several times, I would have responded to you like I just responded to dragonridr.
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: dragonridr
Here's the rub. The economy is at near full employment. The "doesn't add 1.5 trillion" to the deficit argument is actually more wishful thinking than saying it will add to the deficit. Even if it isn't 1.5 trillion, being revenue neutral or positive can only happen through extremely good economic expansion. Something that is unlikely given how the economy is currently performing.
Since when do we assume the best?
originally posted by: face23785
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: dragonridr
Here's the rub. The economy is at near full employment. The "doesn't add 1.5 trillion" to the deficit argument is actually more wishful thinking than saying it will add to the deficit. Even if it isn't 1.5 trillion, being revenue neutral or positive can only happen through extremely good economic expansion. Something that is unlikely given how the economy is currently performing.
Since when do we assume the best?
Again false. The real unemployment rate is nowhere near "full employment". Now that one lie has been exposed, you have to switch to another one? Wouldn't it be easier to just tell the truth?
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: face23785
Believe what ever you want. You clearly believe that the economy can run at a super charged rate to prevent this tax bill from running a deficit already, so clearly nothing is stopping you from inventing my thought process in your head. I'm done arguing with you now though. It's a waste of my time.
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
originally posted by: face23785
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: dragonridr
Here's the rub. The economy is at near full employment. The "doesn't add 1.5 trillion" to the deficit argument is actually more wishful thinking than saying it will add to the deficit. Even if it isn't 1.5 trillion, being revenue neutral or positive can only happen through extremely good economic expansion. Something that is unlikely given how the economy is currently performing.
Since when do we assume the best?
Again false. The real unemployment rate is nowhere near "full employment". Now that one lie has been exposed, you have to switch to another one? Wouldn't it be easier to just tell the truth?
Yeah all those 10 year old children and 80 year old retirees are just ITCHING to get to work right?