It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: ignorant_ape
hi -last year - the cockwombles at " answwers in genesis "`published a " list " of thier " achevements " over that previous 23 years [ thats how long the scam has now being running ]
reading it - the obvious fact leaps out - its utterly lacking any actual scientific acheivement - over 23 [ now 24 years ] - thats a remarkable feat - to actually avoid any science for 24 years - while labeling yourself " creation scientists "
now its " that time of year again " - and crickets - they have obviously not acheived anything sat all this year
last years " acheivements list "
a science free zone indeed - and people wonder why i mock them
Antithesis is part of the scientific method. When one does not address falsifying hypothesis, one is not doing science, it is just a different 'sciency' sounding dogma.
originally posted by: DexterRiley
a reply to: chr0naut
Antithesis is part of the scientific method. When one does not address falsifying hypothesis, one is not doing science, it is just a different 'sciency' sounding dogma.
That's an interesting statement. Maybe even thought-provoking.
Are you saying that "creationism" is a falsifying hypothesis of "evolution?"
- dex
a science free zone indeed - and people wonder why i mock them
originally posted by: randyvs
a reply to: ignorant_ape
The arogance of one produced by the laughable amount of
scientific knowledge you boast about should embarrass you.
If you're any kind of intellectual at all.
Consider,as an example, that all chemical reactions tend towards the lowest energy state, how could we, then, end up with such an incredible variety of matter at all scales distributed across the observable universe?
originally posted by: rnaa
a reply to: chr0naut
Consider,as an example, that all chemical reactions tend towards the lowest energy state, how could we, then, end up with such an incredible variety of matter at all scales distributed across the observable universe?
That is only true in a closed system. Evolution does not occur in a closed system. Stars do not form in a closed system. Closed systems only exist in hypotheticals.