It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: odzeandennz
i wonder why everything is always about the right or the left to so many.
i wonder what drives this division so perpetually.
i just want to know what or how the ones who made this about a 'side', the thought process that compelled you to post what you did.
originally posted by: ketsuko
a reply to: gernblan
As already explained, depending on how the press chooses to write about it, it can be portrayed as collusion or at least as evidence of such.
originally posted by: thepixelpusher
a reply to: pavil
Oh dear Lord calm down. Trump is NOT in collusion with Russia. How feeble-minded are you!?
originally posted by: SailorJerry
a reply to: burgerbuddy
yeah thats what it is, its not that ONE of yall hypocritical cheer leading ass hats wants to answer for one single side switching thing youve done.
Refer back to my post a page back and why NONE of yall want to touch it.
stop acting brave.
Yall are all hypocrites.
The Russian President has long held a grudge against Clinton for trying to weaken his rule when he was most vulnerable.
“She set the tone for certain actors inside the country; she gave the signal,” Putin said of Clinton at the time, accusing her of ordering the opposition movement into action like some kind of revolutionary sleeper cell. “They heard this signal and, with the support of the U.S. State Department, started actively doing their work.”
originally posted by: Wardaddy454
Hillary Clinton.
originally posted by: pavil
a reply to: JakeR777
Once again, my title was in response to the many who oppose Trump who state with conviction, that Russia won the election for Trump and that Trump is beholden to the Economic and military juggernaut that is Mother Russia. The ones who want zero relationship with Russia due to their interference in our elections.
Is that clear enough for you?
originally posted by: pavil
a reply to: fiverx313
I guess........
I didn't think it was that hard to see my stance on it.
Glad to see you are reasonable. We need reasonable people on all sides .
Like how you added probably to your disclaimer. Lol
originally posted by: FHomerK
a reply to: pavil
The idea that we cannot or should not *TRY* to work with the Russians is about as outdated as the top of the line computer made during the heart of the Cold War era.....
It was first described in 1837 as the successor to Babbage's difference engine, a design for a mechanical computer.[4] The Analytical Engine incorporated an arithmetic logic unit, control flow in the form of conditional branching and loops, and integrated memory, making it the first design for a general-purpose computer that could be described in modern terms as Turing-complete.[5][6] In other words, the logical structure of the Analytical Engine was essentially the same as that which has dominated computer design in the electronic era.[3]
The Arithmometer or Arithmomètre was the first digital mechanical calculator strong enough and reliable enough to be used daily in an office environment. This calculator could add and subtract two numbers directly and could perform long multiplications and divisions effectively by using a movable accumulator for the result. Patented in France by Thomas de Colmar in 1820[1] and manufactured from 1851[2] to 1915,[citation needed] it became the first commercially successful mechanical calculator.[3]
The Jaquet-Droz automata, among all the numerous automata built by the Jaquet-Droz family, refer to three doll automata built between 1768 and 1774 by Pierre Jaquet-Droz, his son Henri-Louis, and Jean-Frédéric Leschot: the musician, the draughtsman and the writer. The dolls are still functional, and can be seen at the Musée d'Art et d'Histoire of Neuchâtel, in Switzerland. They are considered to be among the remote ancestors of modern computers.