It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Blue ShiftI don't know about you, but I'm not aware of the existence of any engine powered by a couple of colliding supermassive black holes.
originally posted by: TrueBrit
a reply to: Harte
Uh... no.
The wave passes through the planet from a given direction, issuing outward from a single point in space and time, warping the fabric of these things, as it propagates away from its origin point. Just because it is not a beam, but a wave, does not mean it comes from every single direction at once.
originally posted by: The angel of light
a reply to: Harte
Again your posts are a distraction sophism here, we have already and since the beginning established that here the discussion is about detectable gravitational waves, the examples you are giving are not even remotely in that category.
What is the mass of a human finger? how fast you can naturally move it? don't you see that you can't produce any detectable gravitational wave with such a tiny mass and slow acceleration?
Once again: we are referring to extremely energetic giant catastrophic events occurring in the space time.
originally posted by: [post=22757808]Now, of course there are a lot of sources of detectable gravitational waves, but that does not mean they are useless to provide useful energy.
originally posted by: [post=22757808]There are also a lot of maritime currents in the Atlantic and in the pacific and who ever knows their paths can use them to navigate, that is something has been done by boats since the times of Vasco de Gama and Christopher Columbus.
originally posted by: [post=22757808]Gravitational waves have trajectories through which they travel, and when ever there is energy moving in a well defined direction there is a way to use it to move with it.
originally posted by: [post=22757808]Is it not proven that the Universe expands from an original mega explosion called the big bang? if entire galaxies are still moving today with energy coming from such events happened millions of years ago of course spacecrafts can do so.
The Angel of LIghtness
originally posted by: TrueBrit
a reply to: Harte
One event, occurring in one location in space and time, produces a wave which issues from that one, singular point in space and time. It does not propagate away from the opposite side of the universe, but from its origin point only. I am not saying that there is only one pair of black holes, neutron stars, or what have you, that ever do these things, because that would be sincerely stupid, given what we know of the mechanism by which our universe came about in the first place.
However, what I am saying, is that one single event produces waves which can be identified as having that singular source. Another similar event, will deliver separate, but similar waves, from a totally different location in space, heading outward from a totally different location in space. This is relatively simple, so I am not sure why grasping it poses such an issue.
Ocean waves do not transport particles. The particles are "disturbed" as they transport the energy of the wave, but there is no net motion.
They do not actually move material within the mass, from one side of it to the other, as a particular particle in the sea might find itself first in one part of the ocean, and then after a time, another.
originally posted by: The angel of light
a reply to: Harte
That depends on what kind of maneuver is performed by the space craft in going around the source of gravitational waves and also on which sail is being used, in other words on what is used to sail them.
I think that is what you are still missing apart of the fact of your absurd comments that spherical radiation can never be used to navigate in space at all, or that the motion of human hands generate detectable gravitational waves.
The Angel of Lightness
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: TrueBrit
Ocean waves do not transport particles. The particles are "disturbed" as they transport the energy of the wave, but there is no net motion.
They do not actually move material within the mass, from one side of it to the other, as a particular particle in the sea might find itself first in one part of the ocean, and then after a time, another.
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: Harte
To catch one of those you have to first match their speed. So...no.
Surfers don't ride open ocean swells though, they ride breaking waves. Different situation entirely.
originally posted by: PhageI've daydreamed about catching a breaking gravity wave. I wonder what sort of reef would be required.