It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Because, about the axis of the earth, a geostationary satellite to stay in orbit must travel at 1.91 miles a second around to maintain its “ gravitationally curved trajectory” .
originally posted by: InfiniteTrinity
a reply to: oldcarpy
Well, I Googled that and guess what? That is completely untrue.
You arent the sharpest tool in the shed are you?
originally posted by: InfiniteTrinity
So now that geostationary orbits are debunked without any of the experts here being able to say one thing of substance in defense of the ridiculous notion, we can conclude that geostationary space satellites can and do not exist. This must mean there is another technology used to do the things all satellites are said to do and there is no need for space satellites.
Therefore all the satellite arguments in support of the popular model are invalid.
originally posted by: InfiniteTrinity
Lets ask Google. Google! Why dont satellites fall back to Earth?
"Because they are orbiting Earth."
Google! Why dont geostationary satellites fall back to Earth?
".....Earth is the third planet in our solar system, it's.."
Thank you for at last coming out of the closet. You believe that satellites do not exist.
I posted an explanation that was aimed at educating children but even that seems to be out of your depth. You are just making an even bigger fool of yourself.
Geostationary satellites debunked.