It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
If you try to calculate how much fuel this will take you will likely run into problems getting enough fuel on the rocket to do this. The more fuel you add, the more extra fuel you have to add to lift the extra fuel, which is a big problem with typical rocket technology.
Take a type of plane - rocket combo say its going 500 mph UP and has enough fuel to do this for weeks .
It's not intended to mean you escape the gravitational pull, it's intended to mean the object is moving away fast enough so it won't fall back down when you send it up.
originally posted by: F4guy
a reply to: midnightstar
First, "escape velocity" is an unfortunate term. You never "escape" a gravitational pull.
No, it's not. If you're in a closed orbit you're not still moving away. If you've reached escape velocity you would still be moving away. The OP's link says this if you read it:
originally posted by: 00018GE
a reply to: midnightstar
escape velocity is the speed needed to get into "orbit".
an object which has achieved escape velocity is neither on the surface, nor in a closed orbit (of any radius).
originally posted by: moebius
originally posted by: lordcomac
If anyone in this thread hasn't played 24 hours of Kerbal space program, go get to it.
basic space physics are hard, this educational game helps.
KSP is awesome!
I recommend it to anyone curious about space and rockets.
originally posted by: midnightstar
en.wikipedia.org...
Earths escape velocity = 25,000 ( apx )
Researchers at the Hong Kong Polytechnic Institute figured out that even a single atom out of place in the structuring of a carbon nanotube reduces the strength of the structure by dozens to factors.
And that's a serious problem, since it's very hard to create large-scale sections of carbon nanotubes without a single flaw.