It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: neoholographic
originally posted by: CreationBro
a reply to: neoholographic
Yes. S and F.
I think that the more you become aware of this, imho, the greater the responsibility you may have in directing your mind in a beneficial way.
Ive seen far too many times, strange "coincidences" wherein nothing but concsious thought and feeling seem to be the cause, or at least, correlated in some way.
Exactly!
There's a lot of things that we call "coincidence" that I think is evidence of the quantum nature of reality and the quantum mind. For instance:
I remember watching TV one day then an experience from High School with a friend I haven't seen since High School popped into my head.
I then bumped into that same friend when I went to the store.
If we have a quantum mind, then there will be times we experience the future before it even happens because a quantum mind wouldn't be bound by time as we experience it. So in this case, I saw my friend and thought about the experience in High School but that thought just happened before I actually saw my friend and we just chalk it up as a coincidence.
There's a lot of things like this and different experiences that we just chalk up to coincidence.
originally posted by: neoholographic
Radin carried out an experiment that was published in Physics Essays What he showed was the consciousness can collapse the wave function. Again, this wasn't published in some fluke Journal.
No problem can be solved from the same level of consciousness that created it.
The most beautiful and profound emotion we can experience is the sensation of the mystical. It is the sower of all true science. He to whom this emotion is a stranger, who can no longer wonder and stand rapt in awe, is good as dead.
I remember watching TV one day then an experience from High School with a friend I haven't seen since High School popped into my head. I then bumped into that same friend when I went to the store. If we have a quantum mind, then there will be times we experience the future before it even happens because a quantum mind wouldn't be bound by time as we experience it
originally posted by: dragonridr
a reply to: neoholographic
I see a problem with the online experiment. They put the interferometer on a rack with servers. The more people that access the server the more the hard drives would operate. Thus is going to cause vibration and hest. This could easily skew their result . I also suspect they kept skewing the data in an attempt to make it more friendly as they put it. This whole experiment seems off they admit during the video several times that most were at chance. But supposedly the people they deemed as medatators did better. Couple of questions there how did they pick this special geoup.
How did they know and the other thing it appears they cherry picked the data. They decided how long a delay before they started counting. When you do things like that it tends not to give you random results.
What it could mean is this: that the human mind (consciousness) isn’t made up of the same matter governed by physics. Furthermore, it could suggest that the mind is capable of overcoming physics with free will. This could potentially be the first time scientists gain a firm grasp on the problem of consciousness. “It wouldn’t settle the question, but it would certainly have a strong bearing on the issue of free will,” said Hardy.
Where did I say this was conclusive? This is what you and your other full time skeptics do on every thread without fail. You make these asinine comments that are not in dispute because you can't refute the substance of what's being said.
Abstract: A double-slit optical system was used to test the possible role of consciousness in the collapse of the quantum wavefunction. The ratio of the interference pattern’s double-slit spectral power to its single-slit spectral power was predicted to decrease when attention was focused toward the double slit as compared to away from it. Each test session consisted of 40 counterbalanced attention-toward and attention-away epochs, where each epoch lasted between 15 and 30 s. Data contributed by 137 people in six experiments, involving a total of 250 test sessions, indicate that on average the spectral ratio decreased as predicted (z=-4:36, p=6·10-6 ). Another 250 control sessions conducted without observers present tested hardware, software, and analytical procedures for potential artifacts; none were identified (z=0:43, p=0:67). Variables including temperature, vibration, and signal drift were also tested, and no spurious influences were identified. By contrast, factors associated with consciousness, such as meditation experience, electrocortical markers of focused attention, and psychological factors including openness and absorption, significantly correlated in predicted ways with perturbations in the double-slit interference pattern. The results appear to be consistent with a consciousness-related interpretation of the quantum measurement problem. 2012 Physics Essays Publication. [DOI: 10.4006/0836-1398-25.2.157]
You sound ridiculous. You said:
Skeptics are necessary to keep people like you in check.
People like me who quote from actual studies and experiments about to be carried out vs. pseudoskeptics like you that try to infest threads with nothing but gibberish.
originally posted by: neoholographic
a reply to: TzarChasm
What are you talking about?
I responded to you one time and you haven't said anything relevant to the thread.
Strike a nerve about what? You haven't refuted or attempted to refute anything that has been posted. All I said was don't muck up the thread with nonsense that has nothing to do with what was actually said as you and others usually do.