It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Aazadan
a reply to: burntheships
The DNC has the right to rig things however they wish. And they did.
originally posted by: Aazadan
a reply to: AndyFromMichigan
Voting isn't supposed to be fair.
originally posted by: Aazadan
a reply to: AndyFromMichigan
Voting isn't supposed to be fair.
originally posted by: xuenchen
originally posted by: burntheships
did they have a legal duty to be impartial
Perhaps.
But a "moral duty" may have more impact.
The way it turned out, it looks like the RNC had an easier time accepting the voters' wishes (who rejected the main stream Republican Candidates).
originally posted by: Abysha
a reply to: burntheships
I think this is why Trump saw a strange kinship with Bernie. Both the GOP and DNC tried this but Trump didn't mind getting dirty to fight back.
Sanders was just too nice to attack Hillary like Trump attacked the other candidates. He invited a positive movement instead when he needed an angry one like Trump created.
originally posted by: Xcathdra
originally posted by: Aazadan
a reply to: AndyFromMichigan
Voting isn't supposed to be fair.
Tell the DNC that and while your at it you may want to suggest they change their bylaws to remove the portions that require their primaries be fair and free from influence by DNC leadership.
originally posted by: jkm1864
originally posted by: xuenchen
originally posted by: burntheships
did they have a legal duty to be impartial
Perhaps.
But a "moral duty" may have more impact.
The way it turned out, it looks like the RNC had an easier time accepting the voters' wishes (who rejected the main stream Republican Candidates).
Well it's not like they didn't get caught rigging the primaries for the two previous elections.