Did The DNC Help Hillary Clinton Beat Bernie Sanders? Fraud Lawsuit Takes Aim

Sanders was put forth as a candidate just for Hillary to have someone that she could beat easily . However , no one counted on the popularity of Sanders and the "sick of the same old candidate" style of politics. When it finally dawned on the DNC that Sanders could actually beat Clinton , they had to go into action quick. By "hook or crook" they had to stop the Bern. Period. And they did.

I agree with some members here in the belief Sanders may damn well have been the President . If he was given a chance. He wasnt. He had the entire crooked DNC (especially the nutcase Schultz) against him

That sounds like the right crux of it, the donations. Don't they also take money from the gov for primaries?

originally posted by: Tardacus

maybe they should use that as their fund raising slogan for the next election?

They would be hard pressed for donations.

originally posted by: burntheships
a reply to: Flatfish

Agree with much of what you said, valid points.

On the EC, that is Apples to Oranges with the delegate issue.
Also, three million possibly illegal votes.

Really?? 3 million illegal votes?

You do realize that it's just as possible that 3 million illegally voted for Trump, don't you?

I mean hell, I did read about an actual case of in-person voter fraud that took place in one of the Carolinas.

Funny part is....... the guilty lady casts a vote for Donald Trump as per her dying mother's request. Her mother died like 2 wks prior to the election.

Prosecutor felt sorry for her and declared that one vote had no affect and therefore declined to prosecute.

Point is, be careful where you point your fingers.

a reply to: Flatfish

I'm sure that is not the only case, however one
too many, even if I this election the elctoral
votes were not even close. Trump + 77

originally posted by: burntheships
a reply to: Flatfish

I'm sure that is not the only case, however one
too many, even if I this election the elctoral
votes were not even close. Trump + 77

If I'm not mistaken, less than 80,000 total people across 3 states is what gave Trump his electoral win despite a 3,000,000 vote loss across the nation.

Like I said, our system is outdated and produces non-representative outcomes.

What more proof do you need?

originally posted by: Flatfish


If I'm not mistaken, less than 80,000 total people across 3 states is what gave Trump his electoral win despite a 3,000,000 vote loss across the nation.

This seems to be a common theme of complaint this
this year amoung Democrats.

originally posted by: WeRpeons
a reply to: burntheships

Bernie was screwed and the DNC is guilty. Both parties always have a behind the scenes pre-selected candidate. Jeb Bush was the RNC selection this past election, just follow the money. I don't trust either party playing fair. Party politics and the unfair advantage of how money plays a roll on who gets more air time doesn't create a level playing field.

Party politics really needs to go.

I'm pretty sure it went when Trump won the election but someone needs to tell the dems identity politics won't work either.

a reply to: FauxMulder

Just like Kings and Queens.

I was telling my friends this years ago... they said "nope! We choose who is in 'power'. They aren't 'appointed'." It doesn't always happen, but we can be manipulated.

a reply to: Flatfish

Most people do not support mob rule at the Presidential Level.

California and New York do not run the whole Nation.

a reply to: burntheships

The DNC has the right to rig things however they wish. And they did.

I said it before, and I'll say it again. The political process is not on the up and up. And you won't be dealing with other countries fairly either. A prerequisite to being president is being able to play the election game and do unfair things that are still within the rules.

If you can only win, when the playing field is level, you're not a good enough candidate for office. We need people who can operate when it's not level, or when it's stacked against them.

originally posted by: Aazadan
a reply to: burntheships

The DNC has the right to rig things however they wish. And they did.

Remains to be seen, they can be held liable
For unjust enrichment, through fraud.

If you can only win, when the playing field is level, you're not a good enough candidate for office. We need people who can operate when it's not level, or when it's stacked against
them.

Interesting, so your saying Hillary was not a good candidate?

originally posted by: Metallicus


THIS is one of the saddest 'arguments' I have ever read.

Who would ever support such an organization? If this person was a 'friend' or acquaintance I would avoid them like the plague.

Metallicus,

It is quite sad, and desperate sounding.

They just use the money for what ever purpose gains
them more money and power.

It's not like they even care about thier members,
much of that money went to Clintons own PAC
If I recall correctly!

Cool, I hope they all fry..I won't hold my breath though.
They definitely engineered things to get Clinton in..is Wasserman Schultz included?

a reply to: vonclod

Good questions, I will try and find the answer,
Will post here.

a reply to: elementalgrove

Here is the first DNC lawsuit.

Local activist files suit for access to exit polling data, Dead witness blocks path to truth

Also, the court document in which Seth Rich was involved.

www.mockingbirdpaper.com...

The 2016 election was RIGGED BIG TIME by the DNC/Hillary.

Collusion with the Liberal MSM (That's 90% of the US Media).

FORCING Bernie Sanders out of the race, by inflicting harm to him and threatening his wife.
wearechange.org...

a reply to: carewemust

Interesting read, And pics.

Was Bernie roughed up?

a reply to: burntheships

Of course they did that's why Seth Rich (former DNC staffer) leaked to wikileaks and was murdered. It also puts the nail in the coffin of the Russia investigation as far as I'm concerned.

a reply to: vonclod

Debbie Wasserman is named in this DNC lawsuit,
separate but still damning.


observer.com...