Pics of Earth from Moon - Which is real Nasa?

I've been having problems with what's real vs what's fake when it comes to Nasa.
If I'm reading these correctly, these are legit pictures on Nasa's website. If the position of the Earth as it relates to the Moon varies that much, I'm calling BS.


1st Image


2nd Image


3rd Image

So which is it Nasa? what is the real distance from the moon to the earth in these photos? What do you think ATS?

a reply to: Tekaran

those are all fake.

its obvious

a reply to: Tekaran

Obviously Swamp Gas.

Remember the time we went to the moon in 19 freaking 69...

Now I'm supposed to celebrate Elon musk doing what NASA did in the 1950s...

Too bad we had a pathetic president whose NASA administer was tasked with....well, I should let Administer Bolden state Obamas NASA dreams in his own words...



Jesus Christ democrats....how did you go from Kennedy to your current views on space...

We should be firmly established on a permanent moon base and making regular manned missions to mars by now...
Not using the effing Russians as a space uber...

It's pathetic and I long for America's return to the moon and beyond.

-Chris

So, by this reasoning, all the pics of the moon are fake. Because some show it far away and some are zoomed a bit

OMG, the moon is a fake!!! Damn, the flat earth people may be right. Even my own eyes and my camera lie to me

Having another pint

a reply to: Tekaran

OMG! You're right! It all has to be fake!

Because we all know that all cameras are the same! Their frame sizes are the same!



Because we all know that the angle of the shot and the FOV of the lens and it's focal length could never make things look different!



There is absolutely No Way it could be done without faking it!



It has to be fake!



No one else could do that....'cause NASA! ZOMG!

Sniff sniff, I detect hints of thinly veiled flat earth thread

originally posted by: TerminalVelocity
a reply to: Tekaran

OMG! You're right! It all has to be fake!

Because we all know that all cameras are the same! Their frame sizes are the same!

Cheers mate. Same as my post but you put a lot more effort in with pics for the dribblers. Kudos. I just couldn't be arsed with the numptys

Because we all know that the angle of the shot and the FOV of the lens and it's focal length could never make things look different!

There is absolutely No Way it could be done without faking it!

It has to be fake!

No one else could do that....'cause NASA! ZOMG!

Sorry, my text got lost. Fair play for putting effort in for the numptys. I just couldn't be arsed

a reply to: TerminalVelocity

Exactly what I was going to reply.

a reply to: TerminalVelocity
So it looks like you are saying the 3rd image is probably more likely to be what earth really looks like from the moon. Gotcha.

What I don't understand is how the Earth is so perfectly round. I thought we were supposed to be more oblate?

All of them.

I thought this was the real one...



Well.. its what I'd be doing if I were on the moon..

We have had these threads before.

Even without the camera focal length being taken into account, the moon looks bigger to the human eye when viewed against the horizon vs high in the sky.

a reply to: HawkeyeNation

We are, but it's not enough for the eye to notice. There's about a 13 mile difference at the equator compared to the poles.

www.scientificamerican.com...

originally posted by: HawkeyeNation
What I don't understand is how the Earth is so perfectly round. I thought we were supposed to be more oblate?

Why would you think that? There is a difference, it's not perfectly round, but it's so small it can't be seen by the human eye.

originally posted by: MasterAtArms
Sniff sniff, I detect hints of thinly veiled flat earth thread

I think so as well just not that clever thats all.

Very disheartening to see so much ignorance in this thread. Apparently different lenses don't exist and not going back to the moon is Obamas fault.

Jesus Christ. I need to find a smarter forum to join .

a reply to: Tekaran

Oh my.
Haven't you ever seen the moon when it first rises and looks hugh in the sky? Then from another prospective it looks normal size?