It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Dfairlite
a reply to: Krazysh0t
First there was no evidence Trump was spied on.
Then there was no evidence that he was unmasked
Then there was no evidence that it wasn't because of 'muh Russia'
Then there was no evidence it was the Obama admin, just the intel community
Now there is no evidence that the unmasking was illegal
When will you guys stop with this?
There was never any evidence that Nixon ordered the watergate break-ins either.
originally posted by: Golantrevize
a reply to: Dfairlite
This election has more drama than house of cards, homeland and 24h combined.
What a series this entire mess will make in a few years. Netflix original?
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: Dfairlite
There is no evidence that the unmasking was even illegal.
originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
a reply to: Krazysh0t
Scapegoat for what? There is no evidence that the unmasking was even illegal.
Isn't the leaking of the information to the press where it gets into felony territory? I'm being sincere in this question.
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: Dfairlite
Scapegoat for what? There is no evidence that the unmasking was even illegal.
The Washington Post's Bob Woodward warned on Wednesday that there are people from the Obama administration who could be facing criminal charges for unmasking the names of Trump transition team members from surveillance of foreign officials. House Intelligence Committee Chairman Rep. Devin Nunes, R-Calif., said earlier that he had briefed Trump on new information, unrelated to an investigation into Russian activities, that suggested that several members of Trump's transition team and perhaps Trump himself had their identities "unmasked" after their communications were intercepted by U.S. intelligence officials. The revelation is notable because identities of Americans are generally supposed to remain "masked" if American communications are swept up during surveillance of foreign individuals. During an interview on Fox News, Woodward said that if that information about the unmasking is true, "it is a gross violation."
He drove the point home, adding that "under the rules, that name is supposed to be blanked out, and so you've got a real serious problem potentially of people in the Obama administration passing around this highly classified gossip."
originally posted by: Boadicea
Fortunately for the unmaskers and disseminators and the publishers of that info, they have every opportunity to explain why what they did was legal and acceptable before congress... AND the court of public opinion.
The Washington Post's Bob Woodward warned on Wednesday that there are people from the Obama administration who could be facing criminal charges
originally posted by: Dfairlite
a reply to: Krazysh0t
First there was no evidence Trump was spied on.
Then there was no evidence that he was unmasked
Then there was no evidence that it wasn't because of 'muh Russia'
Then there was no evidence it was the Obama admin, just the intel community
Now there is no evidence that the unmasking was illegal
When will you guys stop with this?
There was never any evidence that Nixon ordered the watergate break-ins either.