It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Twitter Shadow Ban Is Real - Hacked Documents Coming

page: 1
70
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

join
share:
+34 more 
posted on Mar, 19 2017 @ 04:41 PM
link   
Conservatives are being treated like the Jews in Nazi Germany. Beat up, bullied, censored, and made to feel like a sub class of citizens. What Twitter has done helped propagate this horrific atmosphere of the fascist "kill the Jew" treatment.

As some here may know, I tipped off ATS members in another thread, as a side note, that a Twitter shadow ban list will be coming out. One page out of 82 is listed here on Twitter. The rest will have to come out via Wikileaks or 4chan. The reason for this is that certain authenticating data from Twitter Admin will have to accommodate this. This was submitted to Wikileaks, but I suspect they are too busy with the CIA leaks right now. Please visit this topic for updates as they become available.




You can visit the Twitter topic right here also.
Shadow Ban Info On Twitter
edit on Sun Mar 19 2017 by DontTreadOnMe because: corrected spelling in title


+24 more 
posted on Mar, 19 2017 @ 04:45 PM
link   
I wonder if they can have you see your own posts and hide them from other people.

That way you think you are tweeting and you really aren't.



+5 more 
posted on Mar, 19 2017 @ 04:49 PM
link   
S+F
Please keep on this.
I wonder if the are going to go as far as to shadow ban POTUS?


+6 more 
posted on Mar, 19 2017 @ 04:50 PM
link   

originally posted by: xuenchen
I wonder if they can have you see your own posts and hide them from other people.

That way you think you are tweeting and you really aren't.



Of course they can.
But once comments start drying up it would become obvious.


+10 more 
posted on Mar, 19 2017 @ 04:51 PM
link   

originally posted by: xuenchen
I wonder if they can have you see your own posts and hide them from other people.

That way you think you are tweeting and you really aren't.


Basically, that's a shadow ban in a nutshell.



posted on Mar, 19 2017 @ 04:55 PM
link   

originally posted by: xuenchen
I wonder if they can have you see your own posts and hide them from other people.

That way you think you are tweeting and you really aren't.



You can check that from a different computer...go to the library or summit, and just browse.



posted on Mar, 19 2017 @ 04:55 PM
link   
Marking this to follow ...Maybe Donny can send out a tweet to his shadow followers .



posted on Mar, 19 2017 @ 05:04 PM
link   
If this is true, i wonder what effect it'll have on Twitter?



posted on Mar, 19 2017 @ 05:04 PM
link   

originally posted by: xuenchen
I wonder if they can have you see your own posts and hide them from other people.

That way you think you are tweeting and you really aren't.



That can be done here as well... I think they called it "global ignore". Ask me how I know



www.abovetopsecret.com...
edit on 19-3-2017 by infolurker because: (no reason given)


+2 more 
posted on Mar, 19 2017 @ 05:05 PM
link   
Well at least my name will never be on that list. Avoiding social media at all costs finally paid off.



posted on Mar, 19 2017 @ 05:10 PM
link   
a reply to: elouina

i'm kind of surprised infowars is on there. i mean most of their stories aren't much different than, "i was married to a poly amorous sasquatch."

oh well, twitter is a private company and can refuse service to whoever they want.



posted on Mar, 19 2017 @ 05:10 PM
link   

originally posted by: bigfatfurrytexan
If this is true, i wonder what effect it'll have on Twitter?



It's true all right. The leak author is 100% trustworthy. We may be looking at a class action lawsuit for discrimination.

This ordeal could hit Twitter very hard, or not even make a dent. If no one hears us, will it even matter?



posted on Mar, 19 2017 @ 05:12 PM
link   

originally posted by: subfab
a reply to: elouina

i'm kind of surprised infowars is on there. i mean most of their stories aren't much different than, "i was married to a poly amorous sasquatch."

oh well, twitter is a private company and can refuse service to whoever they want.


No they can't discrimate according to political affiliation. Just like the bakers, we will be suing their socks off.



posted on Mar, 19 2017 @ 05:17 PM
link   
a reply to: elouina

I don't know what kind of claim anyone will have in court. You don't have damages. Twitter still provides you a mic to speak into...they just cut the feed from it. That is within their right.

But that doesn't make it right, and likely will bite them in the ass big time if true.


+1 more 
posted on Mar, 19 2017 @ 05:18 PM
link   

originally posted by: bigfatfurrytexan
a reply to: elouina

I don't know what kind of claim anyone will have in court. You don't have damages. Twitter still provides you a mic to speak into...they just cut the feed from it. That is within their right.

But that doesn't make it right, and likely will bite them in the ass big time if true.


They did this to affect a presidential election, and now a Presidency. Interfering with an election is a felony.
edit on 19-3-2017 by elouina because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 19 2017 @ 05:21 PM
link   

originally posted by: elouina

originally posted by: bigfatfurrytexan
a reply to: elouina

I don't know what kind of claim anyone will have in court. You don't have damages. Twitter still provides you a mic to speak into...they just cut the feed from it. That is within their right.

But that doesn't make it right, and likely will bite them in the ass big time if true.


They did this to affect a presidential election, and now a Presidency. Interfering with an election is a felony.


I think it would be better played from the angle of trying to reinstitute smith mundt and castrating the CIA. Twitter is just a pawn forced into servitude.


+2 more 
posted on Mar, 19 2017 @ 05:40 PM
link   

originally posted by: elouina

originally posted by: subfab
a reply to: elouina

i'm kind of surprised infowars is on there. i mean most of their stories aren't much different than, "i was married to a poly amorous sasquatch."

oh well, twitter is a private company and can refuse service to whoever they want.


No they can't discrimate according to political affiliation. Just like the bakers, we will be suing their socks off.


So Twitter has become the Obama IRS of Social Media.



posted on Mar, 19 2017 @ 05:47 PM
link   

originally posted by: xuenchen
I wonder if they can have you see your own posts and hide them from other people.

That way you think you are tweeting and you really aren't.



You mean kinda like exactly what a shadow ban is?




posted on Mar, 19 2017 @ 05:49 PM
link   

originally posted by: xuenchen
I wonder if they can have you see your own posts and hide them from other people.

That way you think you are tweeting and you really aren't.



I can see where such a feature could come in handy.



posted on Mar, 19 2017 @ 05:51 PM
link   

originally posted by: Perfectenemy
Well at least my name will never be on that list. Avoiding social media at all costs finally paid off.


The same for me. But isnt ATS considered to be social media?



new topics

top topics



 
70
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

join