It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: makkerskilap
a reply to: eriktheawful
Thank you. I actually figured it out while eating my dinner just now, lol.
Can't seem to find the pics after I upload them though, so I'll just do this...
imageshack.com...
imageshack.com...
imageshack.com...
originally posted by: ThePeaceMaker
a reply to: eriktheawful
Ha don't worry I'm not thinking of giving up I've already realised things don't always go according to plan with photography even when I'm snapping pics of planes I still manage to screw up
originally posted by: IntruderAlert
a reply to: wmd_2008
Here we go flat Earther statements, To keep the stars on the exact same place on the camera sensor or on film in the good old days the camera has to be ALIGNED with the rotational axis of the Earth and a drive mechanism to compensate for the Earth's rotation so as the Earth rotates the camera moves to keep the stars in the same position.
Yet you totally ignore the largest motion, of 69,000 miles per hour, around the sun.
Now the OP has already stated that moving the telescope in any direction for a 100 meter would throw off allignment.
A telescope on earth moves 19 miles per second, which is a movement in a direction, that is far greater, yet you can magically ignore this.
The model you all put your faith in is on the verge of collapse.
originally posted by: IntruderAlert
a reply to: wmd_2008
Does that help
No it does not, since it doesn't apply to the scenario I was discussing with the OP. The premise was that if you move a telescope that is zoomed in on Polaris, for a 100m, without changing the angle, then it would be out of allignment.