Electors are being harassed, threatened in bid to stop Trump

Now we are getting reports that some Electors in some states are getting email bombed with threats !!

One says at least 50,000 emails have been received !!

Somebody's really going nuts over the election of Trump.

Even death threats are happening.

Electors are being harassed, threatened in bid to stop Trump

Electors around the country are being harassed with a barrage of emails, phone calls and letters — and even death threats — in an effort to block Donald Trump from being voted in as president by the Electoral College on Monday.

The bullying is overwhelming Sharon Geise’s tech devices, but not her resolve to support Trump.

The Mesa, Arizona, grandmother woke up Wednesday morning to more than 1,500 emails demanding she not carry out her legal duty to vote for the president-elect.

“They just keep coming and coming,” Geise told The Post, estimating she’s received more than 50,000 emails since the election. “They’re overpowering my iPad.”

a reply to: xuenchen

This is what happens when EVERYONE gets a 'participation' trophy and EVERYONE is always a winner.

Graceful losing is a dead skill.

a reply to: xuenchen
Raise your hand if you are surprised this is happening?

originally posted by: stosh64
a reply to: xuenchen

This is what happens when EVERYONE gets a 'participation' trophy and EVERYONE is always a winner.

Graceful losing is a dead skill.

This going beyond button hurt and in to fascist overthrow.

a reply to: xuenchen

Didn't Obama turn down their request for federal protection? Seems like I remember a veteran group willing to step in...
This is just shameful no matter what side you are on.
I agree with Stosh....if you've never been taught to lose gracefully this is what happens.

selective fake news. when its a Trump criticism piece, the news outlet is Trash and 'libtards' pushing their fake news agenda..
when its a favorable piece....


yea... this is mental. both the news and the shameless pick and choose of news source.

originally posted by: Martin75
a reply to: xuenchen

Didn't Obama turn down their request for federal protection? Seems like I remember a veteran group willing to step in...
This is just shameful no matter what side you are on.
I agree with Stosh....if you've never been taught to lose gracefully this is what happens.

The Oathkeepers offered to help if asked.

CALL TO ACTION: Oath Keepers Pledge to Protect Electors from Terrorist Death Threats

originally posted by: TheBulk

originally posted by: stosh64
a reply to: xuenchen

This is what happens when EVERYONE gets a 'participation' trophy and EVERYONE is always a winner.

Graceful losing is a dead skill.

This going beyond button hurt and in to fascist overthrow.

All part of the brainwashing and mind control. Agreed.

So when will the people responsible for these actions face charges of treason and terrorism?

a reply to: xuenchen

There they go again...

The effort to deny the electoral vote to Trump was launched shortly after the Nov. 8 election.

Hmmmm... they speak as if there is one -- and only one -- "effort" to undermine/hijack/steal the electoral college. And since these efforts are not for Hillary, it seems to me that they're not really against Trump either, that it would have happened no matter who was elected. And more and more, I'm believing that these "efforts" were hatched long long ago. They had to get key electors in there to make it happen. They want us to believe that it's all about Trump and a totally spontaneous reaction to his election, but I'm having more and more trouble believing that.

The Clinton campaign came out in support of the effort Monday, backing an open letter from 10 Democratic electors to National Intelligence Director James Clapper calling for an intelligence briefing on what role Russian hackers may have played in the election.

Again, the make no distinction between the so-called "faithless electors" and "Hamilton electors" -- which neither Hillary personally nor her "campaign" have even comment publicly -- and the more recent electors calling for an intelligence briefing -- which Podesta immediately endorsed, presumably in the name of Hillary and her campaign, though he never says that himself in his statement.

We are so being played...

a reply to: xuenchen

If Hillary had won none of this would have happened because patriotic Americans respect the Democratic process. What you have here are the new Left who only support Democracy when they win.

You know, what is going on is absolutely hysterical in two ways.

1. Hysterical as in funny.

2. Hysterical as in the reaction to the election of Trump and the loss of Clinton is like nothing seen before in politics.

The absolute desperation of the Left to win win win despite the game being long over is nothing less than stunning.

Death threats because Hillary didn't win. Are you people serious? What the hell is wrong with you? I'm beginning to think the Left is, as a whole, mentally ill.

a reply to: Ohanka

I wonder if its that dastardly Putin!

a reply to: Restricted

Death threats because Hillary didn't win. Are you people serious?

And just like their friends the 'moderate Muslims' you hear nothing from our liberal friends on ATS condemning this insanity. They are complicit in their silence.

a reply to: stosh64

This is what happens when EVERYONE gets a 'participation' trophy and EVERYONE is always a winner.

Uhm, maybe the republicans can give Hillary a trophy for being the first candidate to run for POTUS while under a criminal investigation from the FBI?

Or heck just make her the POTUS already, as in Prisoner Of The United States.

originally posted by: Metallicus
a reply to: Restricted

Death threats because Hillary didn't win. Are you people serious?

And just like their friends the 'moderate Muslims' you hear nothing from our liberal friends on ATS condemning this insanity. They are complicit in their silence.

I'm as left as they come, pretty damn near socialist - and I have never issued a death threat in my life. All my liberal friends in Austin, Texas haven't either - and I have a LOT of liberal friends.

Now, sending a letter that encourages the electors to vote against Trump? Nothing wrong with that - unless you want to ban free speech.

First of all, We've been getting reports about this for 2-3 weeks now. The fake Russia hacking, The fake "fake news" narrative, the recount, the threatening of electors. Everything they are doing is an attempt to overthrow the election and plant the seeds to never lose another one. Whether or not Trump gets in there doesn't matter. They have everything in place to control all future narrative and be the only influence from this point on. The country has been taken over by one party and it wasn't the party that won the election.

originally posted by: kaylaluv

originally posted by: Metallicus
a reply to: Restricted

Death threats because Hillary didn't win. Are you people serious?

And just like their friends the 'moderate Muslims' you hear nothing from our liberal friends on ATS condemning this insanity. They are complicit in their silence.

I'm as left as they come, pretty damn near socialist - and I have never issued a death threat in my life. All my liberal friends in Austin, Texas haven't either - and I have a LOT of liberal friends.

No, but you didn't exactly condemn the death threat either now did you?

originally posted by: kaylaluv

originally posted by: Metallicus
a reply to: Restricted

Death threats because Hillary didn't win. Are you people serious?

And just like their friends the 'moderate Muslims' you hear nothing from our liberal friends on ATS condemning this insanity. They are complicit in their silence.

I'm as left as they come, pretty damn near socialist - and I have never issued a death threat in my life. All my liberal friends in Austin, Texas haven't either - and I have a LOT of liberal friends.

Now, sending a letter that encourages the electors to vote against Trump? Nothing wrong with that - unless you want to ban free speech.

Do you think we should have elections or should Democrats and the media just install whoever they want?

a reply to: xuenchen

Well sure!

If you don't get your way, threaten with death.

Isn't that in the constitution somewhere?