If Russia did hack us and affect the election.......

I hear the MSM trying to get everyone upset over this. They are trying to "Wake us up" and show that we were manipulated and the ruskies stole this election.

But what exactly did they present to us in this "hack"? Was it a bunch of partisan rhetoric? Lies? Trickery?

Or was it something much more sinister? Like verifiable facts?

It seems whomever is responsible for the release of this information is guilty as hell. Guilty of spreading facts that you weren't supposed to see. Guilty of lifting the veil and showing you that behind those beautiful eyes, is a hideously ugly face.

This in no way changes anything with regards to relationships with any other countries including Russia, but it does put this attack into perspective.

You are being told to be angry that the truth was revealed.

Only half the truth, the republican part was missing.

originally posted by: network dude
I hear the MSM trying to get everyone upset over this. They are trying to "Wake us up" and show that we were manipulated and the ruskies stole this election.

But what exactly did they present to us in this "hack"? Was it a bunch of partisan rhetoric? Lies? Trickery?

Or was it something much more sinister? Like verifiable facts?

It seems whomever is responsible for the release of this information is guilty as hell. Guilty of spreading facts that you weren't supposed to see. Guilty of lifting the veil and showing you that behind those beautiful eyes, is a hideously ugly face.

This in no way changes anything with regards to relationships with any other countries including Russia, but it does put this attack into perspective.

You are being told to be angry that the truth was revealed.

Russians did the job the mainstream media wouldn't do and now we are supposed to be mad at the Russians? Right...

Like you said, no one has yet claimed any of the DNC emails are not true.

a reply to: network dude

The hackers exposed massive corruption.

End
Of
Story!

Yeap. Still looking for evidence or any FACTs that leads these rumors to be true. I guess that's how news operates now and days,

RUSSIA HACKED THE DNC!!!!!

Rumors can be made true as long as a good portion of the population believe it. So far it's not working.

What happened to the 'insignificant' fact that Podesta said he lost his phone in a cab before the DNC/Podesta hack?
Was his cab driver a Russian?

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: network dude

The hackers exposed massive corruption.

End
Of
Story!

This is what makes me smile. They are reporting this, but apparently failing to understand they are perpetuating the story, and the story is that the DNC was exposed for being corrupt. Now again as I have said before, I don't for one second this the RNC is full of unicorns and butterflies, but they weren't exposed here, the Dems were. I'd think they would do best to quietly sit back and mumble amongst themselves.

Two things.

One it is not so much the MSM that are pressing this issue.Last night on late night news, I saw a number of prominent Republicans speaking up with great concern on this issue. And yes, it was 'reported' on MSM

As Indigent points out the information was one sided. One of the tactics of propaganda is omission.

originally posted by: Indigent
Only half the truth, the republican part was missing.

sorry, we are a simple folk. Only one boogyman at a time please.

Then they are doing a better job of fighting US govt corruption than the FBI and DOJ combined

originally posted by: Indigent
Only half the truth, the republican part was missing.

Another MSM "fake news" . Assange himself stated if they had any dirt on the Republicans , they would have released it. They had nothing of use

originally posted by: TerryMcGuire
Two things.

One it is not so much the MSM that are pressing this issue.Last night on late night news, I saw a number of prominent Republicans speaking up with great concern on this issue. And yes, it was 'reported' on MSM

As Indigent points out the information was one sided. One of the tactics of propaganda is omission.

If this was done by Trump himself, while he was chained to Putin and they were both wrapped in a burlap sack, would it change anything as far as what was reported and what facts emerged? I have yet to hear that any of the e-mails were not real.

That's why I find it hilarious that the MSM is even mentioning this. For those paying attention, it only sheds more light on the DNC and the corruption therein.

originally posted by: network dude
I hear the MSM trying to get everyone upset over this. They are trying to "Wake us up" and show that we were manipulated and the ruskies stole this election.

But what exactly did they present to us in this "hack"? Was it a bunch of partisan rhetoric? Lies? Trickery?

Or was it something much more sinister? Like verifiable facts?

It seems whomever is responsible for the release of this information is guilty as hell. Guilty of spreading facts that you weren't supposed to see. Guilty of lifting the veil and showing you that behind those beautiful eyes, is a hideously ugly face.

This in no way changes anything with regards to relationships with any other countries including Russia, but it does put this attack into perspective.

You are being told to be angry that the truth was revealed.

How dare the Russians expose the blatant corruption running wild in our government... how dare they??

Do you know who gets pissed about being hacked, people who are doing things the WRONG way... When you got something to hide, you're always going to be worried about being hacked... The Obama administration has SO many skeletons in their closet and lies being exposed that they're scrambling more than ever... From Fast & Furious, to Benghazi, to the IRS, to the Email server issue, and so on and so on, im just thankful Russia (or whoever it was) exposed the corruption we all know existed..

a reply to: Gothmog

I'm happy Hillary is not president, her stance on Syria could had mean war, but come on, squeaky clean Republicans?

Reps= dems they are all politicians, probably they use the same companies and all to do their questionable deeds.

What's funny (or sad) is that the MSM cares more about the "act" of the hacking, over the "contents" found from the hacking... It literally blows my mind... Oh wait, no it doesn't, the MSM is one of the biggest propaganda machines today...

originally posted by: jhn7537

originally posted by: network dude
I hear the MSM trying to get everyone upset over this. They are trying to "Wake us up" and show that we were manipulated and the ruskies stole this election.

But what exactly did they present to us in this "hack"? Was it a bunch of partisan rhetoric? Lies? Trickery?

Or was it something much more sinister? Like verifiable facts?

It seems whomever is responsible for the release of this information is guilty as hell. Guilty of spreading facts that you weren't supposed to see. Guilty of lifting the veil and showing you that behind those beautiful eyes, is a hideously ugly face.

This in no way changes anything with regards to relationships with any other countries including Russia, but it does put this attack into perspective.

You are being told to be angry that the truth was revealed.

How dare the Russians expose the blatant corruption running wild in our government... how dare they??

Do you know who gets pissed about being hacked, people who are doing things the WRONG way... When you got something to hide, you're always going to be worried about being hacked... The Obama administration has SO many skeletons in their closet and lies being exposed that they're scrambling more than ever... From Fast & Furious, to Benghazi, to the IRS, to the Email server issue, and so on and so on, im just thankful Russia (or whoever it was) exposed the corruption we all know existed..

What is the most frightening thing here I think is we are being dazzled with new and more interesting crimes, so it's easy to forget about the old ones. Like the few you mentioned here. Oh wait, I see something shiny, I have to go now.

originally posted by: Indigent
a reply to: Gothmog

I'm happy Hillary is not president, her stance on Syria could had mean war, but come on squeaky clean Republicans?

Reps= dems they are all politicians, probably they use the same companies and all to do their questionable deeds.

Hey , dont blame me. Assange said there was zero , zip , zilch , nada.
And I am sure if there had been anything on Repubs Assange would have released that first.And heaviest

her stance on Syria could had mean war

Add Russia and a couple more to the list

Face it. The DNC , Schultz and Brasile , and most of all Hillary lost the election for Hillary. It is obvious they went after the far left Progressive Liberals and completely ignored their true constituents . The True Blue Democrats. Cost em bad.And apparently the Dems havent learned their lesson. They are still after the Libs as the news shows.It can only get worse for them.

It's also worth considering that the administration is aware that another hugely damaging leak is about to occur...and they're attempting to 'poison the well' in an attempt to preemptively mitigate the reaction and fallout.

originally posted by: Indigent
a reply to: Gothmog

I'm happy Hillary is not president, her stance on Syria could had mean war, but come on, squeaky clean Republicans?

Reps= dems they are all politicians, probably they use the same companies and all to do their questionable deeds.

so far it looks like the Republicans are guilty of not having a clue what the people actually want. So they are way to busy looking for their ass to be involved in corruption like we have seen from the DNC. (joking aside, I'm sure bad things exist there as well, we just haven't seen anything of value yet)

Has the Obama White House ever fudged intelligence data to suit their needs?


If they have done it once before, why wouldn't they do it again?


And I still want the names, titles and positions of these so called "17 heads of intelligence agencies".

If you can't even tell me the names of your sources, then you don't have any sources. Period.