It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by switchblade
Have to say, that after reading your charming little rant yesterday before it got pulled, that I'm a bit dissappointed that you are a reporter for ATS.
I take it that you ask such blunt questions simply so as people will reply and so gain you points.
I see you point about the swastika symbol, the same as I did yesterday, but for pity's sake realise that a group using that symbol killed MILLIONS of people. Do you really feel the need to wear a symbol of luck so badly that you are willing to upset countless victims in the process. Wear your swastika mate, I hope it brings you all you the luck you deserve. Just remember, most of the people you would be upsetting are in the 80's and 90's. Is it really worth it?
sorry to tell you this, but in life someone's feelings is going to get hurt no matter what you do or when you do it.
Originally posted by worldwatcher
Before the Cross became a Christian symbol it was used in ancient Babylon
and in the worship of the sun god Mithra.
Christianity only adopted the cross in the fourth century after a Constantine vision.
The Fish symbol of Christianity also has pagan origins.
The famous peace sign that we have seen throughout American 60's culture is actually the Cross of Nero.
Nero believed that there would be world peace without Christianity and so the broken inverted cross within a circle represents Nero's vision.
in the world even predating the Ankh sign of Egypt.
The symbol was also used by Rudyard Kipling on the dust jackets of his books.
Yet with all this great history, the symbol of luck has been stolen from all these cultures and has been corrupted and perverted by Nazism and Hitler. How is it that events that lasted less than 50 years can erase the history of thousands of years?
Originally posted by switchblade
Have to say, that after reading your charming little rant yesterday before it got pulled, that I'm a bit dissappointed that you are a reporter for ATS. I take it that you ask such blunt questions simply so as people will reply and so gain you points.
so badly that you are willing to upset countless victims in the process.
most of the people you would be upsetting are in the 80's and 90's. Is it really worth it?
Is it worth it to suppress 3000 years of history for events that only occurred in the past 50 years?
Originally posted by Jehosephat
Wearing a swastika in Europe is in very bad taste and many would take offense and ask you not to wear it.
But I doubt much will happen until 20-30 years from now when people who lived the horrors are no longer alive