It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: kruphix
a reply to: Vasa Croe
So far, the followup emails have shown that the previous leaked emails were a tease, with the followup making the issue a completely benign issue.
This is why you aren't seeing any of this reported outside of far right wing websites.
If you know this isn't the whole story, why make a post about it and get so giddy over it? What if the followup email back from Mills says, "No, hand over everything"?
originally posted by: kruphix
a reply to: Vasa Croe
So far, the followup emails have shown that the previous leaked emails were a tease, with the followup making the issue a completely benign issue.
This is why you aren't seeing any of this reported outside of far right wing websites.
If you know this isn't the whole story, why make a post about it and get so giddy over it? What if the followup email back from Mills says, "No, hand over everything"?
originally posted by: kruphix
a reply to: dashen
that is only if you assume their only method of communication was email
LOL.
So you are going to speculate what their other forms of communication contained?
So silly.
Now the White House is claiming although President Obama did in fact exchange emails with Clinton on her private email account, Obama was unaware the account was hosted on a private server.
"The President was aware of Secretary Clinton's email address, the two did exchange emails but the President I think, not surprisingly, was not aware of the existence of Secretary Clinton's private server," White House Press Secretary Josh Earnest told reporters Monday during the daily briefing.
originally posted by: kruphix
a reply to: IgnoranceIsntBlisss
There out to be more emails in a string immediate to that one that further paint the picture.
And yet there isn't.
Have you stopped to ask yourself why?
originally posted by: kruphix
originally posted by: dashen
originally posted by: kruphix
a reply to: dashen
No, I am not going to assume anything...like a logical person.
actually logic means using available i nformation to infer unavailable information
Oh boy.
Maybe you should take some formal logic classes.
originally posted by: dashen
originally posted by: kruphix
a reply to: dashen
No, I am not going to assume anything...like a logical person.
actually logic means using available information to infer unavailable information
originally posted by: flice
Nice try..... "we could get them to ask for that." Thats intent to withhold information. You cant swing that in any way or shape.
originally posted by: kruphix
originally posted by: dashen
a reply to: Greggers
before we get muddy in definitions, i think my point is ,clear
About as clear as mud.
Logic is a formal method of reasoning to analyze arguments.
Logic isn't a magical way to discover unknown information.