It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
27-year-old Seth Conrad Rich, a DNC Voter Expansion Data Director, was shot dead in the early morning hours of July 10 after a night out in Washington, D.C.
Less than two weeks later, WikiLeaks released nearly 20,000 emails from top DNC officials bolstering claims that the Party favored Hillary Clinton over Bernie Sanders.
(from your link)
"We're not saying that Seth Rich's death necessarily is connected to our publication. That's something that has to be established.
originally posted by: projectvxn
Assange has been dropping small bomblets. They have huge implications, but their impact always seems to be dulled. That has more to do with how the MSM treats the story. Focusing on shooting the messenger rather than the message. They know if they actually start discussing the crap in these e-mails honestly Clinton will lose to Trump.
originally posted by: projectvxn
Holy CRAP that is a hell of an accusation..
In an exclusive interview on The Kelly File, Megyn Kelly asked WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange why the organization was so interested in finding the killer of a Democratic National Committee staffer.
27-year-old Seth Conrad Rich, a DNC Voter Expansion Data Director, was shot dead in the early morning hours of July 10 after a night out in Washington, D.C.
Less than two weeks later, WikiLeaks released nearly 20,000 emails from top DNC officials bolstering claims that the Party favored Hillary Clinton over Bernie Sanders.
The longer this continues the worse it's going to get folks.
Hold on to your hats. This place is gonna get bumpy for a while.
originally posted by: AboveBoard
a reply to: projectvxn
Well, Mr. Assange certainly knows how to dance around a subject. He says this as well:
(from your link)
"We're not saying that Seth Rich's death necessarily is connected to our publication. That's something that has to be established.
So it seems like he's saying that he doesn't know if Rich was connected to the leak or not?
The man is full of double-speak and innuendo.
- AB
This one is a little different in that 1. American media.
2. The language Assange used was quite a bit stronger in this case.
So far neither interview produce solid admissions by Assange that Rich was, in fact, the leaker.
But the seeds were planted and this tree is starting to grow really fast.
originally posted by: DupontDeux
a reply to: projectvxn
For all the good things Wikileaks has done, Julian Assange always comes off as a douchebag to me.
There is something about the way he talks about this - in this interview and in others - that makes me uneasy. There is something disingenuous about it. As if he is not at all believing his own insinuations.
I am afraid Assange might be using the death of this young man as a means to further his personal agenda. Whatever that might be.
originally posted by: DupontDeux
a reply to: projectvxn
For all the good things Wikileaks has done, Julian Assange always comes off as a douchebag to me.
There is something about the way he talks about this - in this interview and in others - that makes me uneasy. There is something disingenuous about it. As if he is not at all believing his own insinuations.
I am afraid Assange might be using the death of this young man as a means to further his personal agenda. Whatever that might be.