It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: xuenchen
The released emails and official statements alone are evidence enough.
1. FBI recommends indictment.
2. Federal prosecutors bring the case to a Federal Grand Jury.
3. The Grand Jury makes the indictment.
4. Arrest warrants issued.
5. Trial date(s) set.
and the FBI is going to put all the pressure on Loretta Lynch that they can to do the right thing
originally posted by: xuenchen
The released emails and official statements alone are evidence enough.
1. FBI recommends indictment.
2. Federal prosecutors bring the case to a Federal Grand Jury.
3. The Grand Jury makes the indictment.
4. Arrest warrants issued.
5. Trial date(s) set.
originally posted by: Metallicus
This is huge news if true. It sounds like Hilary is going to be indicted or at least recommended to be indicted and the FBI is going to put all the pressure on Loretta Lynch that they can to do the right thing. I am not sure anyone can make the Obama regime 'do the right thing', but hopefully it ends up being enough and it will be the beginning of the end for this witch.
NEW YORK – A former U.S. attorney says there is no doubt that, before the November election, the FBI will recommend to Attorney General Loretta Lynch that she prosecute Hillary Clinton for mishandling of classified information, warning that intervention by the White House would provoke a revolt of Watergate proportions.
In an interview with WND, Joseph diGenova said that based “on all the available evidence, including what is publicly known and what is known in the law enforcement community, there is sufficient, credible evidence needed to meet the predicate to begin a grand jury – sufficient evidence for probable cause to believe various crimes have been committed.”
Source
Source 2
originally posted by: reldra
I went back and read your post again. To be sure. I am very puzzled.
originally posted by: xuenchen
a reply to: BubbaJoe
You know 2 main ones.
The SD IG report, and those 22 emails with classified stuff so top secret, the government won't release any at all.
You know the government sources too.
You are dismissed mister.
originally posted by: xuenchen
a reply to: BubbaJoe
You know 2 main ones.
The SD IG report, and those 22 emails with classified stuff so top secret, the government won't release any at all.
You know the government sources too.
You are dismissed mister.
And THAT IS the topic of this thread, a poorly sourced explosive headline used to promote an agenda of only one side of the issue.
originally posted by: TerryMcGuire
a reply to: MotherMayEye
Did I miss something here? Are you sure you were replying to me??? Where did I say I wanted to defend Mrs. Clinton. Where did I even mention Mr. Trump? Here, let me repeat my statement for you.
And THAT IS the topic of this thread, a poorly sourced explosive headline used to promote an agenda of only one side of the issue.
Do you see any mention of either of them? No? Then I guess you are mistaken.
originally posted by: Helious
None of it matters, either way, Trump or Hillary, you will see armed revolution. This country is headed towards violence of it's own making.
Hillary should be praying right now she DOESN"T get elected.
Yes I see your point. But I did understand the context. I was agreeing with one of the aspects of the reply of whoever it was that I replied to. I suppose I might have added a disclaimer concerning the other parts of that post but I never thought to do so.
originally posted by: MotherMayEye
originally posted by: TerryMcGuire
a reply to: MotherMayEye
Did I miss something here? Are you sure you were replying to me??? Where did I say I wanted to defend Mrs. Clinton. Where did I even mention Mr. Trump? Here, let me repeat my statement for you.
And THAT IS the topic of this thread, a poorly sourced explosive headline used to promote an agenda of only one side of the issue.
Do you see any mention of either of them? No? Then I guess you are mistaken.
You replied to a comment belonging to a conversation concerning whether or not it was appropriate to bring Trump up in this topic. Sorry, not sorry, that i realized the context of the comment you replied to. I couldn't separate it because I was involved in that conversation. I figured you understood the context before you replied.
So, YES, you missed something. Yes, indeed.
originally posted by: MotherMayEye
originally posted by: Helious
None of it matters, either way, Trump or Hillary, you will see armed revolution. This country is headed towards violence of it's own making.
Hillary should be praying right now she DOESN"T get elected.
The American people are too complacent and are too quick to 'blame the other party' to revolt.
Revolution is nowhere on the horizon. =(
originally posted by: burntheships
originally posted by: aethertek media matters
mediamatters.org...
Media Matters is a bought and paid for Clinton Propaganda publisher.