It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: IkNOwSTuff
Ok the tourists were stupid and deserve much more than the $110 fine even if their stupidity was well intended.
But really?
To euthanise the animal because it liked humans???
To me this seems like a child breaking a toy so others cant play with it.
Whoever ordered the euthanising of that animal isnt fit to be working in that line of work
originally posted by: Mrgone
Bison from that park have a disease that the rangers are trying to keep to just that park, nothing is allowed out.
Sucks but that's why they couldn't find it a new home. Humans once again sticking their nose into nature's business.
Brucellosis, or Bang's Disease, is commonly found in buffalo, elk and domestic cattle. Cattle, specifically cows, are most susceptible to the disease and its effects however, and are prone to abortions, low milk production and even infertility when infected. Spread through contact with reproductive fluids or grass that is wet with such fluids, brucellosis is difficult to detect and even more difficult to prevent through inoculation. This holds particularly true for the wild, free-roaming Yellowstone bison, which presently number more than 4,000 within the park -- the last truly wild bison found in North America. Because of the National Park Service's policy of natural management in our nation's parks, human influence is kept to a minimum. Yellowstone bison numbers have soared due to lack of predators (although the reintroduction of wolves into the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem is expected to have an effect eventually) and because of the absence of any human-induced population control methods. Scarcity of winter range is the only real check on the Yellowstone buffalo, and thus, the animals have begun to wander north of park boundaries in search of food.
In response to this gradual exodus from the park, the federal government and the state of Montana allow buffalo that cross park lines and threaten to mingle with domestic cattle or damage private property to be shot. Although there are no documented cases of wild bison spreading the disease to cattle, cattlemen support the shootings as they seek to preserve Montana's brucellosis-free status for the sake of their livelihoods and the state economy. The National Park Service endorses the killings as a means to control the bison populations without contradicting their policy of natural management within the park.
originally posted by: AVtech34
a reply to: Mrgone Did that animal test positive for that, or was it killed because of a guess?
Visitors brought the newborn calf to a park facility on May 9, which officials called a dangerous move because adult bison are protective and will attack to defend their young. Rangers took the animal back to where it was picked up, but they could not get it back with the herd after several tries. "The bison calf was later euthanized because it was abandoned and causing a dangerous situation by continually approaching people and cars along the roadway," the park said in a statement.
originally posted by: IkNOwSTuff
a reply to: Mrgone
Ok well thats a bit different and it didnt mention that in the article.
Even with the disease I cant believe killing the poor thing was the way forward.
It had an affinity for humans and people obviously want to see the animals up close, why not keep him as a mascot that visitors could approach and touch?
Here in Oz we have parks you can see native animals in and almost all of them have a few animals that for one reason or another arent in the wild.
They usually become quite social and enjoy human contact.
originally posted by: AVtech34
a reply to: butcherguy Yes, I read the article. It was killed for continuously approaching tourists. If that is the way the blm manages animals they might as well kill off the elk herd in Estes park for doing the exact same thing. Disease or not.
originally posted by: IkNOwSTuff
To euthanise the animal because it liked humans???
To me this seems like a child breaking a toy so others cant play with it.
Whoever ordered the euthanising of that animal isnt fit to be working in that line of work
originally posted by: ketsuko
a reply to: AVtech34
Brucellosis.
Otherwise, yeah, let it be raised and added to a domestic herd but even then you have the risk that it's still a wild animal that's acclimated to humans. If you've ever seen humans working with "domestic" bison, then you know they don't act like domestic cattle at all. They're faster and stronger and a lot spookier.