It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: intrepid
It's simple imo. He threatened to smash her computer. Is that a crime in the States? Threatening of property? Then she actually DID assault this guy, right? Pretty clear cut imo.
originally posted by: mOjOm
a reply to: DrakeINFERNO
Well, it's not technically contact but it is offensive. It's also a threat. I've already said repeatedly that what he did was wrong too.
Am I speaking a different language or something???
Maybe some of you should just read the words for what they say instead of interpreting them to mean something different. There is no need to interpret what I say. Just read it for what it says. It's not a secret f*cking code language or anything. I'm not implying anything or using descriptive language to paint a picture. It's just good old black and white text.
Or better yet. Just don't bother. I'm done arguing about stuff I never said and tired of being falsely accused of sh*t. If that is the best you all have to offer I'm not impressed.
originally posted by: DonVoigt
a reply to: intrepid
No what she did is battery, but in court a judge would believe she was defending herself against a threat, charges dropped.
originally posted by: DrakeINFERNO
Its all too obvious the left cares nothing for others property
. a reply to: intrepid
originally posted by: intrepid
It's simple imo. He threatened to smash her computer. Is that a crime in the States? Threatening of property? Then she actually DID assault this guy, right? Pretty clear cut imo.