It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The bill, now on the governor’s desk, would not apply to abortions performed to save a mother’s life, although the bill lacks similar exceptions for abortions performed in cases of rape or incest.
originally posted by: Sremmos80
a reply to: BIGPoJo
Are only unemployed people having abortions?
But don't force me to pay more taxes for abortions because someone couldn't drive a few minutes down to the gas station for a condom.
originally posted by: windword
a reply to: Wardaddy454
But don't force me to pay more taxes for abortions because someone couldn't drive a few minutes down to the gas station for a condom.
Your taxes don't pay for abortions.
a reply to: BIGPoJo
That's Norway!
We're talking about doctors in Oklahoma loosing their licence to practice medicine for performing a legal and constitutionally protected medical procedure.
originally posted by: buster2010
Funny I thought under Roe v. Wade abortion was legal? What is wrong with these people? They say that getting rid of doctors will have no impact on the medical community. As usual the Republicans who keep crying keep the government out of our lives want to control women's bodies.
The Court based its test on the trimester framework of pregnancy. During the first trimester of pregnancy, when an abortion was considered a safer procedure than childbirth, the Court reasoned that the decision on whether to abort must be left exclusively to the mother. Therefore, any state or federal regulation that interfered with the right to have an abortion would be presumptively unconstitutional. For the second trimester, the Court ruled that the state could regulate abortion only in order to protect the woman’s health. During the last trimester, and after the fetus was considered “viable” (could survive on its own outside the mother’s womb), state laws were permitted to restrict and prohibit abortion except when an abortion would be necessary to preserve the health of the mother.
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: BIGPoJo
Your source:
As a very rough approximation, it appears that no more than 1,000 abortions a year are directly funded by federal taxpayers [3]–i.e., roughly 1 in 1,000 abortions
But tell me, how much did you spend on killing people in Iraq?
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: BIGPoJo
Your source:
As a very rough approximation, it appears that no more than 1,000 abortions a year are directly funded by federal taxpayers [3]–i.e., roughly 1 in 1,000 abortions
But tell me, how much did you spend on killing people in Iraq?
originally posted by: Annee
Hey, let's tax churches - - they can pay for the war - - not abortions.
I'm good for paying for abortions. Take my money to pay for abortions - - not war.
For every unwanted kid not born - - let's send a LIVING ONE to college.
Maybe that LIVING KID will become a doctor - - then self-righteous idiots who can't mind their own business can yank his license.
originally posted by: BIGPoJo
originally posted by: Annee
Hey, let's tax churches - - they can pay for the war - - not abortions.
I'm good for paying for abortions. Take my money to pay for abortions - - not war.
For every unwanted kid not born - - let's send a LIVING ONE to college.
Maybe that LIVING KID will become a doctor - - then self-righteous idiots who can't mind their own business can yank his license.
You can pay for the abortions, I will pay for the Elderly Processing Center. Any elderly person that can't crawl off of the conveyor belt under their own power gets milled up and sold as medical specimens. It could be a brave new world...
I mean, we need to make room for the "worthy to live" and get rid of the "unwanted".
You can pay for the abortions, I will pay for the Elderly Processing Center.
originally posted by: Annee
originally posted by: BIGPoJo
originally posted by: Annee
Hey, let's tax churches - - they can pay for the war - - not abortions.
I'm good for paying for abortions. Take my money to pay for abortions - - not war.
For every unwanted kid not born - - let's send a LIVING ONE to college.
Maybe that LIVING KID will become a doctor - - then self-righteous idiots who can't mind their own business can yank his license.
You can pay for the abortions, I will pay for the Elderly Processing Center. Any elderly person that can't crawl off of the conveyor belt under their own power gets milled up and sold as medical specimens. It could be a brave new world...
I mean, we need to make room for the "worthy to live" and get rid of the "unwanted".
I fully support Euthanasia.
Am against keeping the elderly alive by machine. That includes me.
originally posted by: BIGPoJo
originally posted by: Annee
originally posted by: BIGPoJo
originally posted by: Annee
Hey, let's tax churches - - they can pay for the war - - not abortions.
I'm good for paying for abortions. Take my money to pay for abortions - - not war.
For every unwanted kid not born - - let's send a LIVING ONE to college.
Maybe that LIVING KID will become a doctor - - then self-righteous idiots who can't mind their own business can yank his license.
You can pay for the abortions, I will pay for the Elderly Processing Center. Any elderly person that can't crawl off of the conveyor belt under their own power gets milled up and sold as medical specimens. It could be a brave new world...
I mean, we need to make room for the "worthy to live" and get rid of the "unwanted".
I fully support Euthanasia.
Am against keeping the elderly alive by machine. That includes me.
I am talking about mandatory euthanasia. You have to be able to fight your way to live, if you are helpless as a fetus you die.
Not quite. More like it's based on the safety and health of the mother, vs the state's interest in preserving the life of the unborn.
The problem with the trimester rule is that it does not take into account the ever-advancing improvement in medical technology, both in how it affects abortion and childbirth.
originally posted by: Annee
originally posted by: BIGPoJo
originally posted by: Annee
originally posted by: BIGPoJo
originally posted by: Annee
Hey, let's tax churches - - they can pay for the war - - not abortions.
I'm good for paying for abortions. Take my money to pay for abortions - - not war.
For every unwanted kid not born - - let's send a LIVING ONE to college.
Maybe that LIVING KID will become a doctor - - then self-righteous idiots who can't mind their own business can yank his license.
You can pay for the abortions, I will pay for the Elderly Processing Center. Any elderly person that can't crawl off of the conveyor belt under their own power gets milled up and sold as medical specimens. It could be a brave new world...
I mean, we need to make room for the "worthy to live" and get rid of the "unwanted".
I fully support Euthanasia.
Am against keeping the elderly alive by machine. That includes me.
I am talking about mandatory euthanasia. You have to be able to fight your way to live, if you are helpless as a fetus you die.
Do we have mandatory abortions?