It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by worldwatcher
As a Hindu and a NRI, I accept your proof.
My only question or thought was that some of the most "dangerous" aastras and yantras were supposed to be kept secret and out of government hands. Do you know if this still applies? I was under the impression that there is info still out there even more valuable that what you outlined.
Originally posted by iksmodnad
Indigo_Child may I ask what is your fascination with India regarding UFOs and ET's ?
[edit on 12-1-2005 by iksmodnad]
Originally posted by rajkhalsa2004
Not passing judgement on anything. But the word "Gurkha" in that context does not refer to the Gorkha people. Gurkha in Sanskrit means cowherd. It was also a common name, and was often given to elephants, chariots, etc. in ancient times. (Like how people name their car or boat.)
Originally posted by HarmoniusOne
Indigo, I have missed your posts! I have been away for awhile....
Quote: All points of the compass were lost in darkness.
Fierce wind began to blow upward, showering dust and gravel.
Birds croaked madly... the very elements seemed disturbed.
The earth shook, scorched by the terrible violent heat of this
weapon.
Elephants burst into flame and ran to and fro in a frenzy...
over a vast area, other animals crumpled to the ground and died.
From all points of the compass the arrows of flame rained
continuously and fiercely. "
Question: What came after? Was this the destruction of that society?
Thoughts: From somewhere I can not recall, I have always known the word Shakti to mean power. I found that reference very interesting. It certainly falls in with my beliefs. I fear we are doomed to repeat a history that caused the destruction of another great civilization. Will man ever learn?
Originally posted by Indigo_Child
Originally posted by HarmoniusOne
Indigo, I have missed your posts! I have been away for awhile....
Quote: All points of the compass were lost in darkness.
Fierce wind began to blow upward, showering dust and gravel.
Birds croaked madly... the very elements seemed disturbed.
The earth shook, scorched by the terrible violent heat of this
weapon.
Elephants burst into flame and ran to and fro in a frenzy...
over a vast area, other animals crumpled to the ground and died.
From all points of the compass the arrows of flame rained
continuously and fiercely. "
Question: What came after? Was this the destruction of that society?
Thoughts: From somewhere I can not recall, I have always known the word Shakti to mean power. I found that reference very interesting. It certainly falls in with my beliefs. I fear we are doomed to repeat a history that caused the destruction of another great civilization. Will man ever learn?
I am not completely sure. It says this weapon destroyed two entire races, but I am not sure if it means actual cities, or on the battlefield. If I am not mistaken the city of Dwarika is submerged as soon as Krishna dies. So it was within the time-frame this weapon was supposedly used .
Where your passage says
Gurkha, flying a swift and powerful vimana
hurled a single projectile charged with the power
of the Universe
Mine actually says
Gurkha, flying a swift and powerful vimana
hurled at the three cities of Vrishni and Andhaka a single projectile charged with the power of the Universe
No bloody clue where the writer got that from though. Could be completely wrong.
Originally posted by Indigo_Child
I have decided not to directly respond to Vagabonds spiteful post in the interest of maintaining healthy, informative and fruitful discussion. Someone has to take the role of an adult.
All I am aiming to do is stimulate further discussion by providing the sum of evidence as proof which is greater than the parts. For example, while the Vyaamanika Shastra talks about laser technology. This is corroborated by the Purans that calculate a very accruate speed of light.
A summary of the actual facts:
A. The Vymanika Shastra(VS) is being studied on a very high level of government and science, by a range of scholars, scientists and engineers and has been studied on and off since the early 20th century.
B. The Author Maharishi Baradwaja was a famous a sage that lived in the Hindu Dvarpa and Treta Yuga. He is in the ansectory of Guru Dronacharya, who lived in the age of the Mahabharata. At least 3000 years ago. He penned the Yantra Sarwaswa(all about machines) which is a masterwork on science, of which the science of aeronautics or VS is a part. However, the Yantra Sarsawa has not been found. Baradwaja is also the common author of the Anshu Bodhini(an ancient cosmological work) and Srauta Shastra.
D. The VS materialised in manuscript form between 1908 to 1918 by mystic scholar Anekal Subbaraya Shastry. Anekal claimed to have recieved knowledge of the VS, among other things in a spiritual awakening . He first mentioned the VS to a scientist Dr. Talpade in India in the late 19th century.
E. Indian scientists, physicists chemists at various institutes and centres of technology have claimed to have succesfully have created the alloys and materials using the prescribed formulas in the VS, like Chumbakamani, Panchadhara-loha and Paragrandhika-drava.
Laboratory development of materials has gone through the following process.
· Understanding of poetic form of Sanskrit version.
· Convert to prose form, decode the terms wherever required and arrive at ingredients.
· Use modern equivalents / substitutes, wherever required.
· Determine proportions of mixing
· Use process details to obtain the materials.
2. The Mahabharata is an ancient sankrit epic. Like with any foreign language text, there exists several translations of it, and some translations are more subjective than others. The translation on Sacrd-Texts.com is a translation by Gangully in the late 19th century and it indeed has a period bias. Example, Gangully assumes the great destruction to be some kind of meteroite and fallout effects to be rats eating peoples. This is because Gangully has no reference to nuclear war.
Now, I myself have read this incident occuring in the Mahabharat in the past. I thought it was the Drona Parva, however last night I read the Drona Parva on sacred-texts and could not find this incident. I later found it on the Mausala Parva. I would have edited it into my original post, but I had exceeded my 2 hour edit window.
Here are the relavant passages: www.sacred-texts.com...
"When the next day came, Samva actually brought forth an iron bolt through which all the individuals in the race of the Vrishnis and the Andhakas became consumed into ashes. Indeed, for the destruction of the Vrishnis and the Andhakas, Samva brought forth, through that curse, a fierce iron bolt that looked like a gigantic messenger of death. The fact was duly reported to the king. In great distress of mind, the king (Ugrasena) caused that iron bolt to be reduced into fine powder.
Vaishampayana said: "While the Vrishnis and the Andhakas were thus endeavouring (to avoid the impending calamity), the embodied form of Time (death) every day wandered about their houses. He looked like a man of terrible and fierce aspect. Of bald head, he was black and of tawny complexion. Sometimes be was seen by the Vrishnis as he peered into their houses. The mighty bowmen among the Vrishnis shot hundreds and thousands of shafts at him, but none of these succeeded in piercing him, for he was none else than the Destroyer of all creatures. Day by day strong winds blew, and many were the evil omens that arose, awful and foreboding the destruction of the Vrishnis and the Andhakas. The streets swarmed with rats and mice. Earthen pots showed cracks or broke from no apparent cause. At night, the rats and mice ate away the hair and nails of slumbering men. Sarikas chirped, sitting within the houses of the Vrishnis. The noise made by those birds ceased not for even a short while by day or by night. The Sarashas were heard to imitate the hooting of the owl, and goats imitated the cries, O Bharata, of jackals. Many birds appeared, impelled by Death, that were pale of complexion but that had legs red of hue.
I am not actually sure where the word "Gurkha" originated from in the context of the Mahabharata. It appears in a passage Dr Childress uses for his book. I will research furter on this.
It would be helpful if there were more translations of the Mahabharata readily available, so we can compare.
3. I thought it would not be necessary to quote exact passages, cite chapters from the Mahabharata. As I thought it was well known that the Mahabharata and Ramayans are teeming with references to vimanas, yantras, aastras and other technology. I mentioned a few as well.
Worldwatcher sumised it quite well "As a Hindu and an NRI I accept your proof"
You would have to be illterate not to know that. As for the Vedas not describing weapons and flying vehicles. The Vedas are spiritual scriptures, not scientific or historical documents. The Bhagvad Gita was supposedly revealed on the battlefield of the Mahabharata to Arjuna. Yet, nor does it, mention any weapons or technology, again, because it's a spiritual scripture.
4. No, actually the dates for the Mahabharata in the time frame of 3000-10,000 years are given in terms of archeological, historical and scientific studies into the Mahabharata. I produced evidence that Indian archeologists and scientists have discovered the lost city of Dwarika, where artifacts were dated with scientific techniques to be possibly 7000 to 10,000 years old.
As for the Ramayana. The Ramayana was considered by those who lived in the age of the Mahabharata - "eons ago". It occurred in the Treta and Dvarpa Yuga, which according to the Hindu Calender, was 1.2 million years ago. This is why it very interesting that a bridge has been found between India and Sri Lanka in that time-frame, because that is exactly when Rama ordered it's construction.
Further, as hard as this is to digist, according to Hindu history, people in the Dvarpa age could live to 100,000 years old and could only die if they willed it. This is why the sage Maharishi Bhadarwaja was able to live through two epochs. It is only in the Kaliyuga age, where human age is said to decrease to 120 years.
5. No my evidence is most certainly not just a book. As I said in my original post. What we call mythology, was called history by our ancestors. Unlike yourself, I am not adopting an intellectually arrogant and close-minded approach. I am actually testing the veracity of Indian mythology as history.
You mentioned Zeus and the bible describing technology. It is indeed very possible that they are describing advanced technology. However, it is open to interpretation and because the references are so vague, it sounds like magic. However, in the case of ancient Indian descriptions, the technologies are described in an empirical, practical and scientific manner. Not as supernatural
For instance all technology is described as a "yantra" or a machine that people use. Even the demi-gods use machines. So, this is not the case of some omnipotent beings that can cast down thunder through their eyes.
Further, all the yantras, work on scientific principles. There is absolutely no doub that ancient India had a very advanced and sophisticated society. As early as 800BC, an Indian surgeon was performing cataract operations, plastic surgery, artificial limb augumentation, cesareans and even brain surgery.
I am not sure how you can claim I am forcing out meanings from text. What conclusion do you arrive at when you see fairly vivid and scientific descriptions, like the following:
A ball of flesh bore out of a womans wombs, divided into 100 parts, processed through chemicals, each part placed into a cooling container for 2 years, and then 100 babies are born from it.
[edit on 13-1-2005 by Indigo_Child]
I can understand why people would want to maintain the mystery behind an object which is all that remains of an ancient temple, especially when a temple destroyed by foreigners when the mysterious object serves to glorify the history of your people.
I continue to be interested in seeing direct quotes with sources. My initial suspicion is that discussion of mirrors and lenses need not always relate to lasers. Would not the clever use of mirrors and magnifying devices be useful to the operator of a vimana (chariot) for having awareness of the battle around him?
I can respect and acknowledge that, however one has to consider that it may not be knowledge contained in the writing itself but only insight or inspiration taken from that writing which has yielded results. Just for example, I bet if i studied Star Wars hard enough I could find inspiration for an invention in that movie. That doesn't mean Star Wars has any basis in real scientific knowledge available to George Lucas in the 1970s.
At the really concrete level, where is what we have. We have some evidence that there was a book called VS in ancient times. Then, starting in 1875 and evolving until 1923 we have a book bearing that same name which deals with matters that were beginning to be theorized on in that timeframe.
To a skeptic, it occurs that religious and scientific fringes sometimes borrow from eachother. Often they are caught red handed when the science is disproven. This was the case with H.P. Blavatsky's hijacking of the concept of Lemuria. In other cases where the scientific theories do pan out we can never know if the religious who attatched themselves to it were telling the truth or not.
Try to picture this in a modern context and see if you don't understand my skepticism here. Suppose that here in 2005 I just happened to "uncover" an ancient text which dealt in vague terms with emerging sciences that we do not yet fully comphrehend and to top it all off I claimed that the information was revealed to me by God. I'd have to be extremly charismatic, to say the least, to sell such a story.
Again taking a look through a skeptic's glasses:
You take a group of people who are familiar with the relevant science. They make 3 successive translations- first the extremely difficult translation from poetic sanskrit, which is so difficult that ambiguities can arise between a nuclear blast and a plague of rats as we have noted above. Then the translation to prose. Then finally the translation of non-technical terms into modern technical terms, whereby "light of the sun" could become fire, plasma, fusion, or any number of things.
After these 3 translations by men who understand science there is a tremendous potential for them to have made independent inventions while trying to pound these round pegs into square holes. The true credit belongs not to the text but to the men who were able to abstractly create something new just because they were looking for it.
From a skeptics viewpoint the nuclear attack is almost certainly the effect of period bias, not the other way around. I would be happy to look at other pre-nuclear translations if you know where we can find them.
I can't blame you for that part. In the other thread I said that I thought it was in the Drona Parva. I'm just guessing that you read that and took my word for it when you started this thread.
I appreciate that you have found this passage. At face value it makes the nuclear war interpretation appear to be a modern bias. It would take a lot of talking to convince me that a nuclear attack was derived from this description except through the powerful influence of period bias.
Carbon dating can be heavily confused if the object is submerged. Also the fact that an area above water was somehow caused to be submerged points to atmospheric/oceanic changes which would have created a plateau of uncertainty in carbon dates, not unlike that surrounding the Younger Dryas.
I would also like to make it clear that I didn't pluck my date out of the clear blue sky. According to wikipedia, astronomical events described in the Mahabharata would support a dating of 3100BC.
Well, this is where religious and historical discussion really have a hard time being reconciled. I am interested in your statement that hinduism believes in the limit to 120 years. This is the same number given by the bible is it not?
This is much easier for a believer to say. Looking at the above discussion of the "nuclear war" passage it seems plain to the eyes of a skeptic that the vedas are equally magical in nature. Empirical means measurable. The Vedic descriptions are soft and require interpretation by someone having knowledge apart from them. If they contained Empirical descriptions we could have followed the plans and built aircraft centuries ago.
Same in Greek mythology. Zues' bolts were made by Haephestus (spelling?) if I remember correctly.
Feel free to provide sources. I have expected you to claim that they were using X-ray machines. You do realize that these operations were being performed with crude tools that probably hurt as many people as they helped, right? Or did they use lasik for cataract ops?
You are aware that does not relate to any modern technique, right? You take an invalid, cut it into 100 pieces, and each piece grows a new whole? Only with starfish. It's just an old mystical story about something that couldn't and still can't be done.