Larry Silverstein designed NEW WTC-7 in April of 2000

a reply to: Chadwickus

I didnt get that impression.

He said April 2000 and then 2002. Both mentions sounded very deliberate.

a reply to: theultimatebelgianjoke

Anyone besides me rather repulsed....by his chewing gum while speaking into a mic? Yuck!

a reply to: gladtobehere

You need to listen several minutes before his April 2000 bit to understand the context.

April 2000 makes no sense. April 2002 makes sense, as the construction site was set up in May 2002.

He even says construction started almost immediately once a plan was decided upon (paraphrasing).

Starting at 54 minutes in, the insect talks about the 99 year lease that he signed. He stops short of saying how insane he was for doing it.

You know what Larry, everyone else thought the same thing, that it made no sense.

He also mentions the insurance policies but doesnt mention that they covered terrorist attacks. Wonder if he had an inside job "rider"?

At 55:30, the cretin mentions WTC 7. He tells us how the antenna from the North Tower hit WTC 7 and "started a fire". He then says "by the afternoon, the building just collapsed", gesturing with his hand that it pancaked downwards very quickly.

He skips a beat when he was feeding us this line of BS. And no mention of him deciding to "pull the building", how strange.

a reply to: Chadwickus

Yah, I dont hear what youre hearing. Sounds just as deliberate regardless of how early in the video I start listening.

He sounds like a typical over achiever.
They never think about their own mortality.
After a certain point they have no need for more personal wealth.
Besides I'm sure it's all set up in an ongoing corporation which will outlast him. (maybe)

Calling him names like insect and cretin only belittles the sayer.
If he had the same get up and go as many conspiracy believers he would be a cashier at walmart, living in his mothers basement.

a reply to: Informer1958

The fact is, the real Terrorist who brought down the WTC are untouchable and above the laws of our land, and it is no conspiracy. One can just look at Hillary and see that. To big to jail.

There were Kings who believed they were too big and above until they lost their heads!
The timing.

www.historycommons.org...
July 24, 2001: World Trade Center Ownership Changes Hands for the First Time

Westfield America Inc. will be responsible for the retail space, known as the Mall. Silverstein Properties’ lease will cover the roughly 10 million square feet of office space of the Twin Towers and Buildings 4 and 5. Silverstein Properties already owns Building 7 of the WTC, which it built in 1987. This is the only time the WTC has ever changed hands since it was opened in 1973.

Silverstein's Lenders Want More Insurance

September 10, 2001: Anti-Terrorism Meeting at WTC on 9/11 Is Canceled

Sad

Automated Announcement Heard by 'a Lot of People' - The recorded female voice that makes the announcement usually comes on automatically in situations such as when a sprinkler is loose, telling people to return to their offices, according to Hermina Jones, a security guard in the SCC.

originally posted by: Informer1958
a reply to: wildb



Larry Silverstein was only a lease holder.

Connections buying the center in 2000 with foreknowledge I think he had big plans for the insurance and the future.

Six weeks before the terrorist attack in New York, Larry Silverstein leased the Twin Towers for 99 years, paying $3 billion.
read more: www.haaretz.com...

Shortly after the events of September 11, Prime Minister Ariel Sharon called Larry Silverstein, a Jewish real estate magnate in New York, the owner of the World Trade Center's 110-story Twin Towers and a close friend, to ask how he was. Since then they have spoken a few more times. Two former prime ministers - Benjamin Netanyahu, who this week called Silverstein a "friend,"
read more: www.haaretz.com...

A settlement was reached in 2007, with insurers agreeing to pay out $4.55 billion,[3][4] which was not as much as Silverstein had sought. Silverstein also ran into multiple disputes with other parties in the rebuilding effort, including with the Port Authority. In an agreement reached in April 2006, Silverstein retained rights to build three office towers (150 Greenwich Street, 175 Greenwich Street, and 200 Greenwich Street), while One World Trade Center (previously referred to as the "Freedom Tower") would be owned by the Port Authority, as would Tower Five, which it would have the option of leasing to a different private developer and having redesigned as a residential building.[5]

en.wikipedia.org...

a reply to: Informer1958

A great post Informer1958!

originally posted by: gladtobehere
And no mention of him deciding to "pull the building", how strange.

Not strange at all, as he never said to "pull the building"!

a reply to: gladtobehere

He also mentions the insurance policies but doesnt mention that they covered terrorist attacks. Wonder if he had an inside job "rider"?

Terrorism clause in policy was required by the people putting up the money (GMAC, later known as ALLY Bank) - you dont
think Larry paid for it out of own pocket..??

He did like everyone else does when buying real estate - HE BORROWS THE MONEY -putting up only small fraction

The lenders want their investment protected in case of disaster, demanding insurance. Larry tried to cheap out opting
to buy only 1 Billion worth. Investors wanted 7 billion. Settled for 3.55 billion

As for terrorism - there was that little incident in 1993 (Feb 26) where terrorists set off truck bomb in parking garage
causing hundreds of million in losses. Investors demanded be protected in case of terrorist attack.

originally posted by: hellobruce

originally posted by: gladtobehere
And no mention of him deciding to "pull the building", how strange.

Not strange at all, as he never said to "pull the building"!

So you think "pull it" means to tell firefighters to leave the building ?

That is not what he said, but nice that you think it was!!!

Why would a building contractor use that term , which is used to describe completing destruction of a building, not to mention something that would not have been his call ANYWAYS, IF it was about the firefighters.....

It is most entertaining to see the ways in which you can justify yourselves, when Larry does not back you up!!

Thanks for the reply's guys..

a reply to: ParasuvO

I believe it is you that is in unicorn land.

Why would he talk about the building being destroyed in 2001, then how he said he would rebuild as fast as possible, then jump back to April 2000 with getting plans, then go forward again to May 2002 when construction started?

April 2002 makes sense chronologically, April 2000 does not.

jesus larry at least wait until after you blow the building to build a new one! these fraudsters are getting lazy!

originally posted by: Chadwickus
a reply to: ParasuvO

I believe it is you that is in unicorn land.

Why would he talk about the building being destroyed in 2001, then how he said he would rebuild as fast as possible, then jump back to April 2000 with getting plans, then go forward again to May 2002 when construction started?

April 2002 makes sense chronologically, April 2000 does not.

Maybe because in April of 2000 he made the plan
In Sept of 2001 they destroy ed the buildings
And
In may of 2002 they utilized the plans

Makes perfect sense