It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: netbound
I read a lot of posts from folks who seem to hate Einstein on some personal level. It’s almost cultish in a way.
Einstein’s GR, and the gravitational waves it predicts, is expressed mathematically in non-Euclidean geometric terms. It’s not easy to visualize, but the math works.
originally posted by: intergalactic fire
originally posted by: netbound
I read a lot of posts from folks who seem to hate Einstein on some personal level. It’s almost cultish in a way.
Same can e said about the cult who praise him as a god.
Einstein’s GR, and the gravitational waves it predicts, is expressed mathematically in non-Euclidean geometric terms. It’s not easy to visualize, but the math works.
With math you can make everything work.
Einstein killed science.
Before him, science was based on observations and experimental data which holds physical ground.
Claiming that imagination is more powerful than knowledge just proofs he was a fool. If science tells you stuff like this you should get very suspicious. It has no place in physics.
People who claim they understand and believe GR and QM, just have their heads high in the sky.
As i said before, it's just the same as those who claim that the abstractism of J. Pollock makes sense, they just want to believe and fool themselfs they are better than the rest.
Gravity and gravitational waves are indeed, as you say different animals, it doesn't take away both have no proof they exist nor does gravity. It's all mathematical, gravity waves don't fit Newton's law. The math has been altered to make it work.
It's an absurd statement that two bodies attract each other by a force that is directly proportional to the product of their masses and inversely proportional to the square of the distance between them. The math may work for 2 bodies, but it can't explain the interaction between 3 or more bodies, the equation won't work and collapses.
Also is there no way to physically reproduce or test this, it has never been done.
Good luck recreating a mini solar system in a lab to verify this equation btw.
Another proof to me that gravity is a farce is the invention of dark matter and an even stranger concept dark energy.
With Newton's and Einstein's equation of gravity the universe doesn't make any sense, we shouldn't even exist.
Even at the quantum level, proof of gravity has yet to be found, that's what they are hoping to find with CERN.
Any experiment must provide the same results and be repeatable by others. Failure of either of these two points immediately invalidates any idea.
originally posted by: intergalactic fire
a reply to: dragonridr
I am no christian or follower of any other religion.
If things do not work the way they want, a constant is added to fix the problem.
Just like the gravitational constant.
When further equation no longer work, the constant’s value is altered. All physicists know this problem but it's just being ignored.
Any experiment must provide the same results and be repeatable by others. Failure of either of these two points immediately invalidates any idea.
Show me proof this shirp has been reproduced, to my knowledge it's only been observed ones.
Why makes such an announcement when repeatability hasn't been made yet, That's not the way a scientific method works.
originally posted by: intergalactic fire
They even haven't found any pattern.
It's exactly the same they measured when in 2010 data was collected but it turned out to be a blind injection.
and for which practical application have you used them? lets hear it
originally posted by: dragonridr
originally posted by: Nochzwei
negative. einsteins equations are not used in any space flights
a reply to: dragonridr
You obviously never used einstiens equations have you?
originally posted by: Box of Rain
originally posted by: intergalactic fire
They even haven't found any pattern.
It's exactly the same they measured when in 2010 data was collected but it turned out to be a blind injection.
So why wouldn't the people behind the blind injection drill tell them about it (as they did in 2010 after the researchers were taking the validity of the signal to a vote)?
The blind injection drill is being carried way too far if the people who perpetrated it let the full LIGO team publish.
originally posted by: Box of Rain
So why wouldn't the people behind the blind injection drill tell them about it (as they did in 2010 after the researchers were taking the validity of the signal to a vote)? The blind injection drill is being carried way too far if the people who perpetrated it let the full LIGO team publish.
originally posted by: intergalactic fire
There is much at stake here and it just happened to be the 100 anniversary...
originally posted by: Kratos40
a reply to: cavtrooper7
Aahhh....Mathematically it was deduced by Dr. Einstein around a hundred years ago. We now have the technology to prove him wrong or right. He was RIGHT!
Mind blown....right?
originally posted by: imitator
To detect something way smaller than the diameter of a proton is just silly with a laser, and to try it on earth with all the noise... the more sensitive the laser Interferometer becomes, the more noise you pick up.... they can counter that noise in a vacuum all they want, it is housed to external forces on earth....