It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The time for a dictator and monarch is upon us, and however much this may displease the libertarian matters not. His goals were sabotaged by his acceptance of the rodent, and the time of the wolf has arrived. I fear the best we can hope for is that our ruler be benevolent, and that under his reign a better humanity emerges.
But with history as my guide, I won’t be holding my breath for such an outcome.
Why Libertarians Are Hopeless
originally posted by: greencmp
I am sorry to say that I am forced to agree with this assessment of the state of political discourse and the direction of our society.
Blame is irrelevant at this point, logic and reason no longer serve us if ever they really did considering how little they influence popular opinion.
Why Libertarians Are Hopeless
The time for a dictator and monarch is upon us, and however much this may displease the libertarian matters not. His goals were sabotaged by his acceptance of the rodent, and the time of the wolf has arrived. I fear the best we can hope for is that our ruler be benevolent, and that under his reign a better humanity emerges.
But with history as my guide, I won’t be holding my breath for such an outcome.
"A democracy cannot exist as a permanent form of government. It can only exist until the majority discovers it can vote itself largess out of the public treasury. After that, the majority always votes for the candidate promising the most benefits with the result the democracy collapses because of the loose fiscal policy ensuing, always to be followed by a dictatorship, then a monarchy."
-Alexander Fraser Tytler(?)
I really can’t see a way to pull up out of this death spiral, the damage is too extensive and there is no will to repair it anyway.
originally posted by: greencmp
Why Libertarians Are Hopeless • Christopher Cantwell
originally posted by: TheTory
a reply to: greencmp
Might I suggest a political persuasion in lieu of your conclusion?
originally posted by: nwtrucker
originally posted by: TheTory
a reply to: greencmp
Might I suggest a political persuasion in lieu of your conclusion?
I thought that he had. Benevolent dictatorship.
originally posted by: reldra
originally posted by: greencmp
I am sorry to say that I am forced to agree with this assessment of the state of political discourse and the direction of our society.
Blame is irrelevant at this point, logic and reason no longer serve us if ever they really did considering how little they influence popular opinion.
Why Libertarians Are Hopeless
The time for a dictator and monarch is upon us, and however much this may displease the libertarian matters not. His goals were sabotaged by his acceptance of the rodent, and the time of the wolf has arrived. I fear the best we can hope for is that our ruler be benevolent, and that under his reign a better humanity emerges.
But with history as my guide, I won’t be holding my breath for such an outcome.
"A democracy cannot exist as a permanent form of government. It can only exist until the majority discovers it can vote itself largess out of the public treasury. After that, the majority always votes for the candidate promising the most benefits with the result the democracy collapses because of the loose fiscal policy ensuing, always to be followed by a dictatorship, then a monarchy."
-Alexander Fraser Tytler(?)
I really can’t see a way to pull up out of this death spiral, the damage is too extensive and there is no will to repair it anyway.
Then what group do you feel is not hopeless?
originally posted by: TrueBrit
a reply to: greencmp
This is why we need to stop voting for parties and personalities, and start voting on the issues. And I do not mean that we need to vote for the person or party who will advance our will in a given vote, but we need to install a system of governance in the western world, which totally does away with representatives, and forces each individual to represent themselves.
The people should be the ones to compose and decide upon which policies will be bought forward for possible immortalisation in law, and the people should then vote on which policies get through that process, and which fail. The people. THE PEOPLE! Not a judge or any collection thereof, not a politician or any number thereof, but the whole of the mass of the people, by some system of distributed democracy, one in which the people are the SOLE power in the nation.
I think running a modern, western nation by way of party political status quo, is bound to result in failure at some point, and arguably it already has. I want better for my own nation here in the UK, and I think that if people by and large, in the States had any idea that such a thing could come about at some point, they would want it yesterday.
originally posted by: Swills
a reply to: greencmp
If anyone is hopeless it's the conservatives. Look at the clowns running for president in the GOP. Good lord, they need to clean house ASAP. Democrats too, just horrible.
originally posted by: namelesss
originally posted by: greencmp
Why Libertarians Are Hopeless • Christopher Cantwell
So democracy is a failed experiment.
No surprise here!
What's with demonizing an entire 'category' of people?
Isn't that bigotry, like; all Republikkkans are low IQ, greedy, selfish, corrupt people (just because most/many are)?
To me, anyway, 'libertarian' has something to do with 'liberty' (definitionally, anyway).
Last I heard, that was not a 'bad thing'!