It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: InnerPeace2012
a reply to: Granite
The IS infection should be over with in no time, in fact everybody seems weary of the US and allies next move, so I guess Iran is ensuring that it doesn't fall victim to another one of the devious western 'terrorists' programs.
And Iran has every right as a country to defend it's sovereignty especially from a police state that doesn't know how to mind it's own business..
originally posted by: Granite
originally posted by: InnerPeace2012
a reply to: Granite
The IS infection should be over with in no time, in fact everybody seems weary of the US and allies next move, so I guess Iran is ensuring that it doesn't fall victim to another one of the devious western 'terrorists' programs.
And Iran has every right as a country to defend it's sovereignty especially from a police state that doesn't know how to mind it's own business..
Yes, it took three days to ruin fours years of CIA/NWO/TPTB/Obomber efforts.
What took Evil Empire so long?
originally posted by: buster2010
a reply to: Granite
But...but...the Nuke Deal was supposedly written to stop this development!!!
No it wasn't. The Nuke deal was to stop them from developing nuclear weapons they still have the right to make ballistic missiles.
originally posted by: buster2010
a reply to: Granite
But...but...the Nuke Deal was supposedly written to stop this development!!!
No it wasn't. The Nuke deal was to stop them from developing nuclear weapons they still have the right to make ballistic missiles.
originally posted by: buster2010
a reply to: Granite
But...but...the Nuke Deal was supposedly written to stop this development!!!
No it wasn't. The Nuke deal was to stop them from developing nuclear weapons they still have the right to make ballistic missiles.
originally posted by: Gothmog
originally posted by: buster2010
a reply to: Granite
But...but...the Nuke Deal was supposedly written to stop this development!!!
No it wasn't. The Nuke deal was to stop them from developing nuclear weapons they still have the right to make ballistic missiles.
And now , arm them with nuclear warheads which they will soon have enough funding for thanks to the good old US and Obama. Which they have been researching for years ,,,,
originally posted by: Granite
originally posted by: buster2010
a reply to: Granite
But...but...the Nuke Deal was supposedly written to stop this development!!!
No it wasn't. The Nuke deal was to stop them from developing nuclear weapons they still have the right to make ballistic missiles.
Okay...we will probably get an Israeli attack soon to make "document" mute though.
originally posted by: buster2010
originally posted by: Gothmog
originally posted by: buster2010
a reply to: Granite
But...but...the Nuke Deal was supposedly written to stop this development!!!
No it wasn't. The Nuke deal was to stop them from developing nuclear weapons they still have the right to make ballistic missiles.
And now , arm them with nuclear warheads which they will soon have enough funding for thanks to the good old US and Obama. Which they have been researching for years ,,,,
You have been listing to Benny's propaganda too much Iran has no nuclear weapons program. So how can they place them on the missiles when they aren't making them?
1992: Israeli member of parliament Binyamin Netanyahu predicts that Iran was “3 to 5 years” from having a nuclear weapon.
1992: Israeli Foreign Minister Shimon Peres predicts an Iranian nuclear warhead by 1999 to French TV.
1995: The New York Times quotes US and Israeli officials saying that Iran would have the bomb by 2000.
1998: Donald Rumsfeld tells Congress that Iran could have an intercontinental ballistic missile that could hit the US by 2003.
originally posted by: AmericanRealist
a reply to: Gothmog
ahh yes, the same nuclear weapons that Israel and friends have been scare mongering about for the last 20 years right??
1992: Israeli member of parliament Binyamin Netanyahu predicts that Iran was “3 to 5 years” from having a nuclear weapon.
1992: Israeli Foreign Minister Shimon Peres predicts an Iranian nuclear warhead by 1999 to French TV.
1995: The New York Times quotes US and Israeli officials saying that Iran would have the bomb by 2000.
1998: Donald Rumsfeld tells Congress that Iran could have an intercontinental ballistic missile that could hit the US by 2003.
Netanyahu Worked Inside Nuclear Smuggling Ring
This time its true though right?? for sure its only 3-5 years this time, again .....