It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Where does the child stand in this situation?
That is a LOT of aborted babies.
originally posted by: windword
a reply to: TechUnique
Sorry, a "human" fetus is NOT a person. A person is someone who has been born, and has taken their "first breath" of life. The man in your picture has been born, and IS a person. The fetus in your picture is past the stage of viability and would only be aborted if it was catastrophically deformed or diseased and/or posing a risk to its mother's life.
I don't understand why Christians are so bent on forcing women to give birth to unwanted children who are most probably going to end up being tortured for eternity, by Satan, according to their own religion.
originally posted by: windword
a reply to: TechUnique
Again, a fertilized egg is not a baby, an embryo is not a baby and a fetus is not a baby. A woman's egg doesn't stop being a part of her body when it is fertilized. She has every right to evict it from her body. I wonder where your own moral compass points, when you promote the concept of women's bodies as merely incubators for your seed, with no care or concern for her self determinism and autonomy.
Becoming a parent isn't a duty, it's a choice.......possibly the most selfish choice that any woman will make.
originally posted by: Benevolent Heretic
a reply to: TechUnique
Get your facts straight before you post some emotionally-based internet BS.
Dred Scott did NOT say that the negro wasn't a human being. It said he wasn't a CITIZEN.
Roe V Wade said the fetus is not a PERSON as regards the 14th amendment. The word "person" appears many times in the Constitution, and none of them has any possible pre-natal application. Citizens are BORN or Naturalized. Fetuses are neither.