It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: 11andrew34
It's not really a propulsion system. It's a vectored 'emergency brake.'
How fast are you moving when you are sitting still?
It's all about reference frames.
...
Throwing a lot of energy back and forth in that chamber may be creating something analogous to drag with respect to larger reference frames.
I didn't say it had. i implied that if it was experimental error it is not one easily ferreted out even with hordes of qualified experts trying to find it.
originally posted by: GetHyped
a reply to: stormbringer1701
Experimentor error has not been ruled out, no matter how much the wishful thinking. This is especially pertinent to such extraordinary claims.
originally posted by: JadeStar
originally posted by: tanka418
originally posted by: JadeStar
I'm just going to put this right here, courtesy of the nice people i met at NASA Ames:
Wow...thank you.
That was quite interesting...a magneto hydrodynamic drive using the quantum vacuum...
Q-drive stuff starts around 30 min...
I feel that by the time I am a senior citizen in 45 years we will already have sent an interstellar probe on the way to some nearby solar system either by crazy fast means or a slower (but still 100-1000x faster than New Horizons) "traditional" means.
If the EmDrive is still generating thrust even when the power is turned off, it strongly implies that the measured energy was thermal, and therefore indicative of a false positive reading. This latest project is just one of many that has attempted to determine whether EmDrives or the closely related Cannae Drive can actually function. None of the experiments yet performed have been subjected to rigorous peer review, and many of them were publicized and interpreted by the developers of the drives — not independent scientists.
Unfortunately for all involved, wishing really, really hard for a thing to be true doesn’t make it so. Until the EmDrive has undergone rigorous experimental validation from a neutral independent team of scientists with no ties to the inventors, it’s impossible to claim the drive works. The equipment needed to measure the amount of thrust and the experimental controls required to validate it are extensive enough as to be daunting to even well-funded labs. As great as the EmDrive looks on paper, we don’t recommend anyone start packing for their 12-hour Moon excursion anytime soon.
originally posted by: stormbringer1701
eh. it actually has been peer reviewed even if not in an academic sense. White, Shawyer, the chinese, Tajmar and now at least half a dozen independent professional efforts have replicated and verified the effect is present in similar apparatus. What has not been sorted out is what exactly is the cause.
the fact that peers have replicated the effect to my mind *IS* peer review. what else do you call independent confirmation by multiple credentialed professionals? perhaps peer reviewed isn't technically accurate but practically? practically I'd say that what has transpired should count.
originally posted by: combatmaster
originally posted by: southernplayalistic
Alpha Centauri, 100 years. Build a big ship. Bring families along. Mate. I'll volunteer to be the guy who impregnates all the women.
Find a habitable planet. Start a new civilization.
Hey, i already called digs on the 'breeder' job...
originally posted by: jonnywhite
a reply to: tanka418
None of what he says gives me any confidence because it doesn't address the important points made by critics.
White's team hasn't confirmed anything. None of it has been peer reviewed. So if a random someebody says they confirm it, you'll believe it, without peer review?
And the thrust being reported by White's team is within the range of error. As well, at least in one of the experiments they performed, a variant of the device which was disabled produced thrust ANYWAY. It'd be like trashing an engine in your car and then it still works. That indicates measurement error to me.
Sorry but you shouldn't throw away the laws of physics and peer review so easily. I think the hype has caught a lot of you.
originally posted by: jonnywhite
a reply to: stormbringer1701
Here's another link which expresses skepticism (dated July 30 2015):
www.extremetech.com - Despite recent claims, the EmDrive remains long on speculation, short on proof...
How do you respond to these quotes from the link?
If the EmDrive is still generating thrust even when the power is turned off, it strongly implies that the measured energy was thermal, and therefore indicative of a false positive reading. This latest project is just one of many that has attempted to determine whether EmDrives or the closely related Cannae Drive can actually function. None of the experiments yet performed have been subjected to rigorous peer review, and many of them were publicized and interpreted by the developers of the drives — not independent scientists.
Unfortunately for all involved, wishing really, really hard for a thing to be true doesn’t make it so. Until the EmDrive has undergone rigorous experimental validation from a neutral independent team of scientists with no ties to the inventors, it’s impossible to claim the drive works. The equipment needed to measure the amount of thrust and the experimental controls required to validate it are extensive enough as to be daunting to even well-funded labs. As great as the EmDrive looks on paper, we don’t recommend anyone start packing for their 12-hour Moon excursion anytime soon.
"Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence." - Carl Sagan.
Read that quote a coupule times.
Do you really think we have the needed extraordinary evidence? I don't think we do. Not even. This demands it.