It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
There are quite a lot of lower Density Beings (3rd, 4th & 5th) that masquerade as gods and higher beings to deceive and manipulate people all of the time. They can put on quite impressive displays and end up attracting quite a few "Followers".
Positive 6th and higher Density beings will discourage followers, religions, cults or the people they are speaking through as presenting themselves as "Guru's". They will work to teach you that you need to find the answers within. There are no light forces coming to save you. There are no ascended masters or ET's that are going to come down and end the rule of the "Elite" and change the world. Beings of this level are going to encourage us to make these changes ourselves and to become apart of the process
originally posted by: carewemust
Why are there so many so-called news stories in the national media, and thread titles on ATS that end with a "?" (question mark) as of late?
originally posted by: TrueBrit
a reply to: PlanetXisHERE
Great...
At any point, is there any physical evidence presented? Otherwise, there is no difference between this guy, and a thousand or more before him, none of whom back up a single thing they have ever said, with anything substantive.
The measure of worth of any disclosure, is not in the information presented, but the capacity of anyone to prove what has been presented to be a fact, and moreover, to prove it in a manner which could not be denied, even by the sort of person who believes such things to be too fantastic to be real.
originally posted by: NthOther
Did this guy just rip off the Law of One "Ra Material", spinning it into a disclosure angle to sell stuff?
All that talk about "density beings" is a dead giveaway.
I have not been a student of the "Law of One" material. When I began providing the details of my interactions with the Blue Avians to David Wilcock he began mentioning the Law of One material and "RA" quite often to help explain some of the concepts that the Blue Avians were imparting to me. They are very cryptic and often do not answer my questions in the way I would have wanted. DW would reveal that this was almost exactly how "RA" would respond to the questions asked by those involved in that massive research and experiment project.
I had discussed with DW that because of my experience in the SSP and seeing technologies used on people in PsyOp's to make them believe they were "Channeling" ascended masters, ET's and Beings from other Dimensions that I was leery of Channeled material. It was also a fact that certain groups in the SSP's and Secret Earth Government Syndicates (Cabal/Illuminati) were required to read the Law of One and Seth Material while trying to discredit it to the public with the many "PsyOp Channelings" (Which says a lot in itself).
It was not until much later in our conversations that I began to come around and became open to the possibility that the Sphere Alliance may be associated with the "RA" group that is quoted from in the Law of One. All of the Blue Avian information however is very much "Law of One" related (Again and again the Blue Avian information all seems to validate the LO0 Material and vise versa).
originally posted by: PlanetXisHERE
originally posted by: TrueBrit
a reply to: PlanetXisHERE
Great...
At any point, is there any physical evidence presented? Otherwise, there is no difference between this guy, and a thousand or more before him, none of whom back up a single thing they have ever said, with anything substantive.
The measure of worth of any disclosure, is not in the information presented, but the capacity of anyone to prove what has been presented to be a fact, and moreover, to prove it in a manner which could not be denied, even by the sort of person who believes such things to be too fantastic to be real.
What do they say about condemnation without investigation? Are you going to generalize and say that automatically what this guys is saying is false? If you said many have come before him and said things that didn't pan out - I would agree. But there have been some genuine whistleblowers before - not to this extent thought - who have been discredited, arrested or killed by the powers who have much to lose by this info being made public.
You clicked on this thread so you must have some interest in this subject - why don't you watch the video so we can have a conversation based on what is in it, instead of condemnation through ignorance?
originally posted by: TrueBrit
a reply to: PlanetXisHERE
Because I have heard enough.
I want to see evidence that requires no subjectivity in order to astound me. Anything less is not worth my time, because I could write better than what I have heard in the first few minutes of the video, and that is a pretty good indicator that something is amiss. Super federations? Show me a ship. Tell me its current orbital velocity, location in space, give me something I can check using science, not something I have to either believe, or not according to my subjectivity.
Understand, I desperately want answers. I just believe that no answer worth having can be gained from listening to a man I have never heard of, speak. Answers of import will come with physical findings which cannot be refuted. I ask again, are there any of those in the videos? Does this man have anything to offer, save for the apparently cut price sci fi script he lead in with?
originally posted by: In4ormant
originally posted by: PlanetXisHERE
originally posted by: TrueBrit
a reply to: PlanetXisHERE
Great...
At any point, is there any physical evidence presented? Otherwise, there is no difference between this guy, and a thousand or more before him, none of whom back up a single thing they have ever said, with anything substantive.
The measure of worth of any disclosure, is not in the information presented, but the capacity of anyone to prove what has been presented to be a fact, and moreover, to prove it in a manner which could not be denied, even by the sort of person who believes such things to be too fantastic to be real.
What do they say about condemnation without investigation? Are you going to generalize and say that automatically what this guys is saying is false? If you said many have come before him and said things that didn't pan out - I would agree. But there have been some genuine whistleblowers before - not to this extent thought - who have been discredited, arrested or killed by the powers who have much to lose by this info being made public.
You clicked on this thread so you must have some interest in this subject - why don't you watch the video so we can have a conversation based on what is in it, instead of condemnation through ignorance?
He saw info the delegation wasn't privy to? Then how did he did he see it? Then he states if it was information he couldn't access the screen would go blue( nice to see Microsoft has Windows in ET tablets). He contradicts himself 4 times in under a minute.