It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
in 2013, over the vigorous objections of Republicans in the state legislature.
Hospitals in Kentucky are hemorrhaging money and laying off staff, all thanks to the KYNECT Affordable Care Act state health care exchange, according to a report from the Kentucky Hospital Association.
Those losses will only get worse over the coming years, the hospitals say.
Democratic Governor Steve Beshear established KYNECT as a state-run Obamacare health exchange [url=http://kyhealthnews.blogspot.com/2014/07/beshear-issues-executive-order-funding.html]via executive order
Kentucky has emerged as a national leader in expanding health coverage through the implementation of the Affordable Care Act. The creation of Kynect, the online marketplace where consumers can buy health insurance, and the expansion of Medicaid eligibility permitted by the health reform law have resulted in more than 400,000 Kentuckians being enrolled in new health coverage. Under the strong leadership of Governor Steve Beshear, Kentucky became the only state in the southeastern United States to expand Medicaid and create a state-based health exchange. And while the rollout of the federal health exchange was plagued by technical problems and frustrating delays, the smooth operation of Kynect, overseen by Cabinet for Health and Family Services Secretary Audrey Haynes, is viewed as a national model.
An August 2014 Gallup report found the state had reduced the number of uninsured Kentuckians from 20.4% of the population in 2013 to 11.9% by mid-2014. That reduction is larger than any other state except Arkansas. This is good news for those Kentuckians who previously had no health coverage and an important step toward creating a healthier state.
While Kentuckians should be proud of this achievement, it is also important to understand another part of the story: The government’s success in expanding health coverage has come at a significant cost to Kentucky hospitals.
Many hospitals in the Commonwealth are now operating under severe financial stress due to major changes in the health system. These financial pressures, which include payment cuts to Kentucky hospitals projected to reach nearly $7 billion through 2024, have resulted in hospital staff layoffs and threaten to reduce the availability of hospital care, especially in rural areas. As a result, the value of expanded health coverage could be seriously compromised if some hospitals are forced to reduce services due to these financial pressures—jeopardizing the quality of care and requiring patients to travel outside of their home communities to obtain needed services.
Slowing down spending on hospital care is one of the best things we can do for the economy and our health. The United States spends the highest percentage of its GDP on health care of any country but gets worse outcomes. Even by U.S. standards, Kentuckians overutilize hospital care.
Read more here: www.kentucky.com...=cpy
Getting too much or the wrong kind of care can be hazardous. Just ask the patients who underwent thousands of unnecessary heart procedures until the feds blew the whistle on St. Joseph-London last year.
Read more here: www.kentucky.com...=cpy
The projected $1 billion loss by 2020 is predicated on reductions in federal payments for uncompensated care as more people gain insurance and become paying patients. The payment reductions have twice been delayed and may be delayed again, though, as we said, slowing down hospital spending would be a good thing.
Read more here: www.kentucky.com...=cpy
originally posted by: reldra
a reply to: SlapMonkey I am wondering if it is because hispitals must charge reasonable prices for things now. Like they can't charge $74 for a tiny plastic cup and 2 aspiran. Medicaid would already pay out on a set rate schedule..now all insurances do. Maybe the hospitals have to get better materials vendors and cut costs to operate. Not necessarlly lay off staff, but buy suplies at a reasonable rate rather from, say, a board member's brothers company that is turning massive profits.
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: SlapMonkey
To get a reality look at how bad things have gotten, look at the price of medication in the US then compare it to the price in Canada.
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: SlapMonkey
There is DEFINITELY a cost being factored in there because of insurance though. Medication may be more expensive than in Canada without insurance, but it certainly wouldn't be nearly as high as it is now.
But the thing that few people talk about, and that no serious policy proposal attempts to fix—the arrangement that accounts for much of the difference between health spending in the U.S. and other places—is the enormous administrative overhead costs that come from lodging health-care reimbursement in the hands of insurance companies that have no incentive to perform their role efficiently as payment intermediaries.
More than 20 years ago, two Harvard professors published an article in the prestigious New England Journal of Medicine showing that health-care administration cost somewhere between 19 percent and 24 percent of total spending on health care and that this administrative burden helped explain why health care costs so much in the U.S. compared, for instance, with Canada or the United Kingdom. An update of that analysis more than a decade later, after the diffusion of managed care and the widespread adoption of computerization, found that administration constituted some 30 percent of U.S. health-care costs and that the share of the health-care labor force comprising administrative (as opposed to care delivery) workers had grown 50 percent to constitute more than one of every four health-sector employees.
The Affordable Care Act (ACA), the federal health reform law enacted in March 2010, was intended to slow the growth in health care spending and expand health coverage to the uninsured with a variety of reforms. These reforms include:
- Important changes in rules relating to private health insurance, such as eliminating limits on preexisting conditions and lifetime coverage caps and prohibiting health premiums from being based on a patient’s health condition
- Allowing individuals to buy health insurance from online health insurance exchanges (Kentucky’s is known as Kynect) and providing financial subsidies to help buy coverage for those whose incomes are below 400% of the poverty level ($79,160 for a family of three)
- Expanding Medicaid coverage (the federal/state health coverage program for low-income citizens) to people with income up to 138% of the poverty level ($27,310 for a family of three)
As noted earlier, the implementation of these reforms in Kentucky has resulted in 413,000 additional Kentuckians being signed up for health coverage as of April 21, 2014, with approximately 75% (330,615) enrolled in Medicaid and 25% (82,795) buying private coverage through Kynect.
While the ACA has reduced the number of uninsured Kentuckians by approximately 50%, it also imposes significant cuts in Medicare and Medicaid payments to hospitals to help pay for expanded coverage. The fifteen year (2010-2024) reduction in payments to Kentucky hospitals due to the ACA is estimated at $4.6 billion. These payment cuts take many forms.
Medicare Rates Below Inflation: Both Medicaid and Medicare pay hospitals less than the actual cost of delivering care. (Medicare pays 86% and Medicaid pays 82% of the actual cost of treating patients covered under these programs.) Medicare’s annual rate updates had not kept up with inflation prior to passage of the ACA, and beginning in 2010, the ACA further reduced annual rate updates.
Readmission Penalties: Beginning in 2012, hospitals that readmit patients within 30 days of discharge at higher-than-expected rates for any reason (even if the readmission was not preventable or did not relate to the patient’s original hospital stay) have had all of their Medicare payments reduced. This penalty increased each year, reaching a 3% level in 2014 where it will remain. Studies have shown that hospitals in states with high rates of poverty and chronic disease—factors that are beyond the control of hospitals—have higher rates of readmissions and are therefore unfairly penalized.
Hospital-Acquired Conditions: Beginning this year, one-fourth of all hospitals in the United States will have all Medicare payments cut if their rates of hospital-acquired conditions increase—even if the rate of occurrence is small.
Cuts in Payments for Uncompensated Care: Both the Medicare and Medicaid programs provide special payments to hospitals to help offset the cost of treating patients who are uninsured or are covered by Medicaid (since Medicaid payments only cover about 82% of a hospital’s cost). These payments, known as disproportionate share hospital (DSH) payments, will be significantly reduced under the ACA, despite the fact that the payment shortfall from Medicaid will rise due to the Medicaid expansion, approximately 12% of Kentuckians remain uninsured, and hospitals will continue to incur costs for uncompensated care expenses. Medicare DSH payment reductions started in 2013 with a 16% reduction, and these cuts are expected to increase. The start of Medicaid DSH cuts has been delayed until 2017, when total payments will be reduced by 26%, followed by further reductions until payments are cut by 50% in 2019.
originally posted by: SlapMonkey
It's not the hospitals' fault, but they're the ones getting fiscally blasted by the results of these decisions.