It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
But, "equal treatment". And alcohol is not a protected minority.
originally posted by: Deaf Alien
a reply to: Annee
But, "equal treatment". And alcohol is not a protected minority.
Yeah but wouldn't it be the taxi driver's responsibility? It's akin to barkeepers and bouncers making sure drunk people do not drive.
Refusing to give them a ride makes them culpable.
That would be a good argument in court to change that.
originally posted by: Deaf Alien
a reply to: Annee
Maybe not discriminatory but it's more of a responsibility. I guess this is going off topic slightly but somebody started it lol but here's an article
www.wsbtv.com...
I guess my point was that the taxicab driver's reason to refuse (based on religious belief) is not a good idea as it can kill people.
originally posted by: Deaf Alien
a reply to: Annee
Maybe not discriminatory but it's more of a responsibility. I guess this is going off topic slightly but somebody started it lol but here's an article
www.wsbtv.com...
I guess my point was that the taxicab driver's reason to refuse (based on religious belief) is not a good idea as it can kill people.
BTW - - I don't support businesses that serve alcohol should be held responsible once someone leaves the bar. I do support bars having breathalyzers and readily available access to cabs or volunteer services to get people home. Also, cutting someone off if they seem drunk.
originally posted by: Deaf Alien
a reply to: Annee
BTW - - I don't support businesses that serve alcohol should be held responsible once someone leaves the bar. I do support bars having breathalyzers and readily available access to cabs or volunteer services to get people home. Also, cutting someone off if they seem drunk.
That's just the thing. You see somebody drunk trying to get in their car and drive. Especially if it's your friend and knowing that he/she might hurt/kill your family members in the process.
This would make a good topic.
originally posted by: Parthin
It's called Libertarianism. It's not about likes and dislikes, it's about government get out of my life.
a reply to: Puppylove
originally posted by: Parthin
It's not important to make new laws, which can always be abused or evaded. What is important is to change what people think. I accepted gay people as simply having an alternative lifestyle long before that was the "in" thing to do.
When most people agree with you, the ideological battle is already won.
a reply to: Annee