It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Tindalos2013
a reply to: MrMaybeNot
You are familiar with Aleister Crowley.
"Everything is dual; everything has poles; everything has its pair of opposites; like and unlike are the same; opposites are identical in nature, but different in degree; extremes meet; all truths are but half-truths; all paradoxes may be reconciled." — The Kybalion.
Then those in charge of ruining society
originally posted by: Develo
Everybody is responsible for ruining society by silently consenting to injustice.
I doubt you produce 0 waste and do not contribute to worldwide pollution.
I doubt you don't benefit from cheap electronics built by slaves to type your posts.
I doubt you freely share your wealth with everyone you meet.
It's easy to criticize, it's much harder to lead by example...
originally posted by: MrMaybeNot
a reply to: watchitburn
I don't consider myself better anyone. Sorry if it hit home, was only trying to convey how I felt.
originally posted by: Strawberry88
A word of advice; The big boys you are protecting will drop you faster than you can say "oops" when your fantasy comes tumbling down
Yes I benefit from "cheap electronics", but why? Because the market has been flooded and oversaturated with garbage products that are designed to have a lifespan shorter than a goddamn fly
originally posted by: Develo
Yes I benefit from "cheap electronics", but why? Because the market has been flooded and oversaturated with garbage products that are designed to have a lifespan shorter than a goddamn fly
Poor little boy who can't even make an informed buy and is literally forced to purchase useless junk. I have the same phone for 10 years now and no one ever forced me to buy a new one. Your argument is a way to flee your responsibility.
Planned obsolescence or built-in obsolescence[1] in industrial design is a policy of planning or designing a product with an artificially limited useful life, so it will become obsolete, that is, unfashionable or no longer functional after a certain period of time.[2] The rationale behind the strategy is to generate long-term sales volume by reducing the time between repeat purchases (referred to as "shortening the replacement cycle").
Firms that pursue this strategy believe that the additional sales revenue it creates more than offsets the additional costs of research and development and opportunity costs of existing product line cannibalization. The rewards are by no means certain: in a competitive industry, this can be a risky strategy because consumers may decide to buy from competitors.
The rewards are by no means certain: in a competitive industry, this can be a risky strategy because consumers may decide to buy from competitors.
While planned obsolescence is appealing to producers, it can also do significant harm to the society in the form of negative externalities. Continuously replacing, rather than repairing, products creates more waste and pollution, uses more natural resources, and results in more consumer spending.
originally posted by: MrMaybeNot
As a matter of fact I have a iPhone 4
I don't follow trends.
originally posted by: MrMaybeNot
Now regarding planned obsolescence, how do you proceed to find a company that doesn't partake in it?
originally posted by: Calalini
Sounds good, and you'll get a lot of stars, probably. Too bad it's a pipedream, huh?
I should make Youtube videos with this sort of rhetoric. Would make a lot of money off the New Agers. Pictures of nature, wonderful sayings about what we should do, pictures of smiling babies, sunshine, beautiful inspirational music... I can see the comments already "Your video made my cry.", "Why can't more see the world this way..."...etc.
Feel good > reality for many. It's all about that emotional state!
originally posted by: MrMaybeNot
Nothing is true; Everything is permitted.