It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Autorico
He should be able to sue for false advertising.
originally posted by: stormcell
That's the hazard of new developments. Sure, the cable company has conduits and cables outside the development. But they won't provide service until the homeowner market has "matured" after three years.
originally posted by: interupt42
Another example of Comcast great service and worthless FCC and FTC oversight over the telecom industry.
Note: The title is a little misleading from the source as its not comcast specific, but rather the inability to get fast internet from any provider including century link who along with Comcast provided false information and worthless customer service.
The gist: both comcast and century link gave false information numerous times to the customer and provided worthless support and billing.
arstechnica.com...
Also interesting to note that it also covered the B$ www.broadbandmap.gov link that is suppose to demonstrate how much competition is in the telecom market for your area.
In my case, when I searched for my home the information was 100% total B$.
It said that comcast provides 100mb -1gb in my area which is a lie as of last week when I contacted them for fater service than 50mb including business class.
All of the rest supposed providers for my area are also lies: they do not provide service to my area as I have called before with the exception of century link. However, the century link available service in my area is also a lie because its not anywhere near 10-25MBmb its only 3mb .
Try the link for yourself: www.broadbandmap.gov...
You will likely see how the FTC and the FCC are worthless as an overseer of the telecom industry. The information provided is supposed to be justification for the comcast/TWC merger in providing proof of competition.
originally posted by: interupt42
originally posted by: Autorico
He should be able to sue for false advertising.
I remember taking home ed back in middle school early 90's and I recall them covering false advertising and the punishment for it.
However, I don't think that applies anymore or the loopholes are so big that it doesn't matter.
I can't recall to many items that I have purchased that meet the advertised claims as they make it look like. ofcourse they have disclaimers that pretty much gives them the freedom to indulge all they want.