It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
But Democrats learned this week that the bill contains Hyde Amendment language -- a recurring rider that often gets attached to other legislation, and that restricts federal funding for abortion and other health care services.
Republicans argue that the rider has been in there all along, and that senators should have read the bill. Democrats counter that when Cornyn introduced the current version of the bill, he did not make clear all of the ways in which it differed from the earlier version. Rather, Democrats say, Cornyn pitched it as simply a reintroduction of the measure from the previous Congress, which did not have the abortion rider.
"A list was sent to certain members saying, 'Here are the changes from last year.' This provision was not listed among them," said Judiciary Committee member Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) Tuesday.
originally posted by: KawRider9
Being a Conservative that has complained about pork in bills since before Bush was our dear leader, I have to ask, are you only showing outrage because this new Congress is doing it?
I have always said if a bill can't pass on its own merit, it should be scrapped. Debate the issue at hand, not issues that have nothing to do with the original bill.
originally posted by: KawRider9
As long as you don't hate "KawRiders" we're good. Kaw=Kawasaki.
originally posted by: xuenchen
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE introduce the line item veto! Then we can finally end this stupid game of attaching crappy riders to bills to create political strife.
I thought that was declared unconstitutional ?
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE introduce the line item veto! Then we can finally end this stupid game of attaching crappy riders to bills to create political strife.