It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: AllIsOne
A new study from the university of Cambridge suggests that microbe genes have slipped into human DNA. The horizontal gene transfer may be more common than previously thought of. Fascinating!
Source: www.cnn.com...
originally posted by: GetHyped
originally posted by: Snarl
I'm all ears.
You've had evidence presented to you on many occasions. Every time, you just hand wave it away. Forgive me for being deeply skeptical of your intellectual honesty to be "all ears".
originally posted by: PhotonEffect
a reply to: Snarl
Our of curiousity, what field?
What did you work on that turned you away from evolution?
originally posted by: AllIsOne
A new study from the university of Cambridge suggests that microbe genes have slipped into human DNA. The horizontal gene transfer may be more common than previously thought of. Fascinating!
Source: www.cnn.com...
I firmly believe in the evolutionary process. What I don't believe is that SCIENTIFIC proof exists.
originally posted by: Snarl
originally posted by: GetHyped
originally posted by: Snarl
I'm all ears.
You've had evidence presented to you on many occasions. Every time, you just hand wave it away. Forgive me for being deeply skeptical of your intellectual honesty to be "all ears".
Having spent four decades in the field ... a very short period of time mind you ... I'd have to say my skepticism has matured. You can call it a loss of scientific faith. LOL
Humans may have as many as hundreds of so-called foreign genes they picked up from microbes.
"Surprisingly, far from being a rare occurrence, it appears that (horizontal gene transfer) has contributed to the evolution of many, perhaps all, animals and that the process is ongoing, meaning that we may need to re-evaluate how we think about evolution," Crisp said.
originally posted by: Gryphon66
From the OP article:
Humans may have as many as hundreds of so-called foreign genes they picked up from microbes.
"Surprisingly, far from being a rare occurrence, it appears that (horizontal gene transfer) has contributed to the evolution of many, perhaps all, animals and that the process is ongoing, meaning that we may need to re-evaluate how we think about evolution," Crisp said.
As noted, gene transfer is a fairly well understood process. Why again would this new research change our ideas about evolution?
Here's a link to the actual article on the research at Cambridge.
May I suggest that we utilize that reference rather than the book report version at CNN?
As far as the pontificating about supposed flaws in science ...
Honestly, I'll take half-hearted scientific research done for hire any day over the growing numbers of insipid folk trying to justify their own backward beliefs with meaningless, sweeping generalizations, fake statistics, and worse than anything else ... pretending that personal opinions are equivalent to actual established fact.
All of you who have had any real scientific training, earned your living through any scientific, technological or educational field, or who have benefited in your life from advances in medicine or technology brought about by that same science that you now "don't trust" should be very proud that you're very likely contributing in your own minuscule way to helping humanity (or at least the United States) slip into another ignorant period glorifying beliefs (particularly religious beliefs) over knowledge.
Rather than trying to discount the basis of scientific understanding and research methods, why aren't you working to help individuals become better critical thinkers? Eh? Instead, you just whine incessantly about your opinion about science and claim doubtful credentials in your baseless appeals to your own authority.
You should be so proud of yourselves, in my opinion.
originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: chr0naut
Several members referring to "science based bona fides" is a generally accepted form of an appeal to authority here.
Out of 243 words in my post, you want to focus on the word "religious" being used one time in one sentence.
I submit that for some reason, you want to ignore what I said in favor of a simplistic and incorrect attempt to invalidate my comment which focuses on BELIEF.
Belief and religion are not synonymous.
Next?
originally posted by: chr0naut
originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: chr0naut
Several members referring to "science based bona fides" is a generally accepted form of an appeal to authority here.
Out of 243 words in my post, you want to focus on the word "religious" being used one time in one sentence.
I submit that for some reason, you want to ignore what I said in favor of a simplistic and incorrect attempt to invalidate my comment which focuses on BELIEF.
Belief and religion are not synonymous.
Next?
The process of science is that new insights often contradict previously held beliefs.
Can you cite one actual instance of observed genetic change that cannot be better explained by a process of horizontal genetic transfer rather than vertical?