Iraqi Parliamentarian Claims to Have Evidence Of US Support of ISIL

What reason would this man have to lie about this? What exact evidence does he have? I doubt he would risk his life to come out with an allegation like this.

According to Almasalah news, the head of the Badr Parliamentary bloc shared this information with parliament on Thursday, claiming that the group is in possession of evidence pointing to US military provisions to Islamic State and further stating that they will be able to share the documented evidence at a later time.

Read more: sputniknews.com...

I knew there would be people to come forward eventually to try and expose this BS. If this isnt further proof for those of you that dont think that ISIS/ISIL/IS is nothing more than a bunch of pissed off Syrian(and some from other countries) rebels, being supplied with arms and financial assistance from the US/CIA/Israel/Mossad/Saudi Arabia. I am telling you, the world will find out about this and I honestly think we are headed to a NWO, very quickly...Any wagers on how long this man will live?

Al-Araji’s claims of US military support to Islamic State are not the first of their kind, nor are they the first coming from this particular group. In January, Hadi Al-Ameri, the Secretary General of Badr, reported to Press TV that a US aircraft had air dropped weapons in the Islamic State-controlled Salahuddin Province in Iraq.
According to Press TV, a study conducted by a London-based group has also found that Islamic State militants had been using “significant quantities” of arms marked “property of the US government.”
The weapons were believed to have been transferred to the Islamic State from other rebel groups in Syria, sometimes dubbed as “moderate” by the US government. US Senator Rand Paul had also previously remarked on the possibility of weapons transfer to Islamic State terrorists, stating that “one of the reasons why ISIS has been emboldened is because we have been arming their allies.”
As Badr has not yet revealed the documents, it is unclear whether the new evidence would reveal similar instances of US inadvertent support of Islamic State.


Read more: sputniknews.com...

a reply to: thesmokingman

I will wait for his evidence to be published before agreeing or disagreeing with you.

Lets not forget that the US was supplying the Syrian rebels a few years back when they were trying to overthrow Assad, and were met with heavy resistance from the Syrian army and the world wide community at large.

originally posted by: boymonkey74
a reply to: thesmokingman

I will wait for his evidence to be published before agreeing or disagreeing with you.

Feel free. It is not like it has not been completely obvious from the beginning.

a reply to: boymonkey74
But..But..Its Sputnik news!After RT and unknown socialist blogs and videos a model of investigative fact finding and integrity!

I don't think everyone will be surprised if it's true, although your source has a pro Russian feel to it, so we do have to take that into consideration.

But like yourself, I question how long the Iraqi politician will avoid meeting a hasty ending.

Well this sounds like " A friend of a friend of a friends second cousin" type of politics thing.
If Syrian rebels stole the weapons from other groups and they got into the hands of ISIS I cannot come to the conclusion that the USA is willfully arming ISIS.
It's like those people that think the Jews are responsible for everything bad on the planet.
IE The Jews have all the money and money buys bullets and guns so the Jews are responsible for every death type of stuff....
blah.

originally posted by: TDawg61
a reply to: boymonkey74
But..But..Its Sputnik news!After RT and unknown socialist blogs and videos a model of investigative fact finding and integrity!

I believe them to be more credible than any western MSM source....

It always worries me when they say "we have proof, but won't tell you..... Yet"

But if we keep checking their site, (more hits) you'll see this proof.

But saying that, if it does exist, and will be published we know western media won't acknowledge it, and it will vanish into the interweb, or those pesky conspiracy theorist sites,

Unfortunately anything like this against the US of A will be ignored by the Masses.

(Sorry for my low mood reply! )

originally posted by: canucks555
Well this sounds like " A friend of a friend of a friends second cousin" type of politics thing.
If Syrian rebels stole the weapons from other groups and they got into the hands of ISIS I cannot come to the conclusion that the USA is willfully arming ISIS.
It's like those people that think the Jews are responsible for everything bad on the planet.
IE The Jews have all the money and money buys bullets and guns so the Jews are responsible for every death type of stuff....
blah.

Lets not forget that ISIS was initially supplied an armies worth of weapons "left" in Iraq by the US....They have been supplied from the beginning.

The key phrase is at the end,
"US inadvertent support of Islamic State." that doesn't gel entirely with what is written at the start of the report. However this is something that has been put to and in the Iraqi parliament, so Hadi Al-Ameri will have dot the I's and cross the T's to be at least plausible and, as to exactly what he means.

To add; Hadi Al-Ameri has also talked about Iran's major contribution to defeating Isis in Mosel, and Iraq is recognizing that, and asking for more help from Iran, and also it has been reported that the US is happy enough to not interfere in Tikrit while Iranian troops sort it out there.
It kinda makes you wonder too why Netanyahu still had to rattle on about Iran in his American speech, while all this is going on, it makes him look bad IMHO...second thoughts, he was likely talking shiite anyway.

originally posted by: smurfy
The key phrase is at the end,
"US inadvertent support of Islamic State." that doesn't gel entirely with what is written at the start of the report. However this is something that has been put to and in the Iraqi parliament, so Hadi Al-Ameri will have dot the I's and cross the T's to be at least plausible and, as to exactly what he means.

To add; Hadi Al-Ameri has also talked about Iran's major contribution to defeating Isis in Mosel, and Iraq is recognizing that, and asking for more help from Iran, and also it has been reported that the US ishappy enough to not interfere in Tikrit while Iranian troops sort it out there.
It kinda makes you wonder too why Netanyahu still had to rattle on about Iran in his American speech, while all this is going on, it makes him look bad IMHO...second thoughts, he was likely talking shiite anyway.

You see, thats the beauty of it. The US CONTINUES to supply the "moderate Syrian Rebels",(ISIS) with the only goal being a war torn Syria, and eventually the removal of Assad. All the while, the US draws every other country in the ME, with the exception of Israel and Saudi Arabia(because they are behind this), thus being able to assess their military power and capabilities, and to use their resources up, because a much bigger WAR is coming to the ME. A war like we have never seen.
Short story is the US has manipulated the ME to fight the ME for them.

Sedki Al-Maket.

Google the name and have a read.

its my bed time and don't have enough time to elaborate more, sorry

a reply to: n00bUK

He has just been arrested by the Israelis.

originally posted by: thesmokingman

originally posted by: smurfy
The key phrase is at the end,
"US inadvertent support of Islamic State." that doesn't gel entirely with what is written at the start of the report. However this is something that has been put to and in the Iraqi parliament, so Hadi Al-Ameri will have dot the I's and cross the T's to be at least plausible and, as to exactly what he means.

To add; Hadi Al-Ameri has also talked about Iran's major contribution to defeating Isis in Mosel, and Iraq is recognizing that, and asking for more help from Iran, and also it has been reported that the US ishappy enough to not interfere in Tikrit while Iranian troops sort it out there.
It kinda makes you wonder too why Netanyahu still had to rattle on about Iran in his American speech, while all this is going on, it makes him look bad IMHO...second thoughts, he was likely talking shiite anyway.

You see, thats the beauty of it. The US CONTINUES to supply the "moderate Syrian Rebels",(ISIS) with the only goal being a war torn Syria, and eventually the removal of Assad. All the while, the US draws every other country in the ME, with the exception of Israel and Saudi Arabia(because they are behind this), thus being able to assess their military power and capabilities, and to use their resources up, because a much bigger WAR is coming to the ME. A war like we have never seen.
Short story is the US has manipulated the ME to fight the ME for them.

Yes we know that there are IS factions in Syria, but there are also other factions who oppose both Assad and IS, so both Assad and these non-IS rebels need to cultivate support from the like of the US. However on the face of it, Assad has no hope of any help from the US, and especially after so many civilian deaths, but also false flags coming out of Western media, that helped no one, especially the ordinary people in Syria, and probably made it all worse in the long run. So Assad will turn to Iran for help at some point if not already..but there again what about the Non-IS rebels fighting Assad and likely 'assisted' by the US? they are not going into a shooting match with Iran who are fighting IS same as they are. In my view, the help given to factionlised Syrian rebels by the US, or the West in general was a serious mistake, and on the other hand there is no way, given what we now know, (officially) about Western intelligence capabilities, that there are some in those intelligence agencies who knew exactly what was/is going on, and that governments have been misled.

Relax, it's just a coincidence. The leader of the free world( the United States) and its allies( Israel and Saudi Arabia) would never do such stuff. It would contradict everything these countries stood for, preached and fought against.

Everything is fine, go back to sleep.

originally posted by: thesmokingman
Lets not forget that the US was supplying the Syrian rebels a few years back when they were trying to overthrow Assad, and were met with heavy resistance from the Syrian army and the world wide community at large.

Yeah, just like A-Q when Afghan was fighting the Russians. Pesky darned commies.

originally posted by: boymonkey74
a reply to: n00bUK

He has just been arrested by the Israelis.

Yup, nothing new for he, and to add, doesn't half fall into line with my thinking.
Why do we need to put up with all this bull. I've spent a great deal of my life attempting to help people in my very small way, and all the time along come governments and wipe out decent people en masse with bombs and bullets, feck 'em.

www.globalresearch.ca... ollaboration/5434175

Well, I remember seeing videos in the news of ISIS obtaining crates of weapons that got dropped.... So I guess there is at least something about this story.
Here is at least one English source.

www.nbcnews.com...*