It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
1963’s Test Ban Treaty damped further experimentation.
originally posted by: mazzroth
I always thought the Kecksburg acorn was something explainable, here's the most likely scenario ...military does a test of this new propulsion system and blast the thing into space accidentally then they find it and the secrecy around it is actually the fact its highly radioactive.
www.space.com...
If you choose to reject the claim that the "path through the atmosphere was probably too steep to be consistent with a spacecraft re-entering from Earth orbit" and decide it was some kind of spacecraft, I think the Cosmos96 hypothesis is probably more likely than the Orion hypothesis, for numerous reasons and I've looked into everything I could find about this case.
The Great Lakes Fireball and Kecksburg Incident
There is some speculation that the reentry of the Cosmos 96/Venera-type spacecraft was responsible for a fireball which was seen over southwestern Ontario, Canada and at least eight states from Michigan to New York at 4:43 p.m. EST (21:43 UT) on 9 December 1965. Investigations of photographs and sightings of the fireball indicated its path through the atmosphere was probably too steep to be consistent with a spacecraft re-entering from Earth orbit and was more likely a meteor in a prograde orbit from the vicinity of the asteroid belt, and probably ended its flight over western Lake Erie. U.S. Air Force tracking data on Cosmos 96 also indicate the spacecraft orbit decayed earlier than 21:43 UT on 9 December. Other unconfirmed reports state the fireball subsequently landed in Pennsylvania southeast of Pittsburgh near the town of Kecksburg (40.2 N, 79.5 W) at 4:46 p.m. EST (although it should be noted that estimating the impact point of fireballs from eyewitness accounts is notoriously inaccurate). Uncertainties in the orbital information and reentry coordinates and time make it difficult to determine definitively if the fireball could have been the Cosmos 96 spacecraft.
Kosmos 96 was destroyed when it reentered the Earth's atmosphere on 9 December 1965. Its reentry has been suggested as a possible explanation of UFO sightings over the United States and Canada, centred on Kecksburg, Pennsylvania; however analysis found the spacecraft probably reentered several hours before the sightings.
Because it was estimated that about 10 people would die prematurely as a result of radioactive fallout which made people reluctant to use it before the nuclear test ban treaty, which eventually killed project Orion completely, at least for any Earth-based launch. I wouldn't rule out the possibility of an orion type launch in the distant future from a space platform constructed at a Lagrange point where the solar wind might blow most of the radiation out of the solar system. It is one of the more viable propulsion technologies, aside from the fallout.
originally posted by: HomerinNC
that method of propulsion would be ideal for a starship, dunno why theyre not doing that yet...
originally posted by: mazzroth
I always thought the Kecksburg acorn was something explainable, here's the most likely scenario ...military does a test of this new propulsion system and blast the thing into space accidentally then they find it and the secrecy around it is actually the fact its highly radioactive.
www.space.com...
originally posted by: butcherguy
IIRC, witnesses at Kecksburg said that the 'acorn', had a band covered in 'heiroglyphics'.
That wouldn't fit with a Project Orion test, but it could fit with a Soviet test, if they mistook cyrillic writing for 'heiroglyphics'.