It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
... is part of a massive labor force that handles “content moderation”—the removal of offensive material—for US social-networking sites. As social media connects more people more intimately than ever before, companies have been confronted with the Grandma Problem: Now that grandparents routinely use services like Facebook to connect with their kids and grandkids, they are potentially exposed to the Internet’s panoply of jerks, racists, creeps, criminals, and bullies. They won’t continue to log on if they find their family photos sandwiched between a gruesome Russian highway accident and a hardcore porn video. Social media’s growth into a multibillion-dollar industry, and its lasting mainstream appeal, has depended in large part on companies’ ability to police the borders of their user-generated content—to ensure that Grandma never has to see images like the one Baybayan just nuked.
“EVERYBODY HITS THE WALL. YOU JUST THINK, ‘HOLY #, WHAT AM I SPENDING MY DAY DOING?’”
So companies like Facebook and Twitter rely on an army of workers employed to soak up the worst of humanity in order to protect the rest of us. And there are legions of them—a vast, invisible pool of human labor. Hemanshu Nigam, the former chief security officer of MySpace who now runs online safety consultancy SSP Blue, estimates that the number of content moderators scrubbing the world’s social media sites, mobile apps, and cloud storage services runs to “well over 100,000”—that is, about twice the total head count of Google and nearly 14 times that of Facebook.
originally posted by: LewsTherinThelamon
We should not be catering to people just because they are offended. That is the same exact thing as catering to a toddler that is throwing a tantrum.
Did you read the article?
They are looking for material that shows people harming animals, beastiality, child abuse, etc. They aren't just censoring gore. They are censoring crimes of all types and things that I really don't want to see myself.
If you owned facebook, would you allow people to post child porn on their page?
Is that acceptable? Those posting it obviously are not offended so does that mean the rest of us need to be exposed to it?
Sadly... Some folks need censored. I never thought I would say that, but if you read the article you will see that they aren't just censoring mundane things.
originally posted by: Kangaruex4Ewe
a reply to: LewsTherinThelamon
The following is my opinion as a member participating in this discussion.
Is it a waste of time for me to point out that I said illegal activities? I'm going to guess that it is, since apparently child porn is ok as long as one has the ability dislike or unfollow it. We should just let the market get that much bigger for it by actually "allowing" it to propagate without any interference. That's pretty sick IMO.
As an ATS Staff Member, I will not moderate in threads such as this where I have participated as a member.
originally posted by: LewsTherinThelamon
I said that I wouldn't moderate content on my website and then everyone jumps down my throat "child porn you forgot hurr durr."
I would love to start my own Facebook. I would make it so that you can post whatever you want, because your page is your page. I would create a "flagging system" so users can "alert" my pretend staff of moderators to content they find offensive