It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Not one to be outdone by an abhorrently sexist remark made by her Fox News colleague Kimberly Guilfoyle a few days ago, Andrea Tantaros had a lot to say about a supermodel expressing her opinion on gun control.
In the wake of the tragedy of the shooting in Ottawa, Canada that killed a Canadian soldier,
supermodel Chrissy Teigen tweeted this:
active shooting in Canada, or as we call it in america, wednesday
— christine teigen (@chrissyteigen) October 22, 2014
The Huffington Post called it a “good point” and I agree wholeheartedly. Canadians were horrified at something Americans have become desensitized to. Gun violence in this country seems to just be an accepted fact of life here and that was the point she was trying to make.
originally posted by: ManBehindTheMask
This is your 2nd foxnews thread today.........
Do you have some sort of vendetta? No offense but....there seems to be some misplaced anger......
I happen to believe shes right.......its a little bit insensitive and too soon to start in with the "gun crime" bs while the whole thing was still in motion there.......
Not to mention it was a gun from a brave man that stopped the whole damn thing.......
Perhaps the "model" should have held her tongue long enough for the bodies to be cold before "shooting" her insensitive mouth off
edit to add, never mind I just looked at your thread history, seems you have some serious issues with "conservatives" and Fox
originally posted by: geldib
The 4th Amendment does protect the freedom of speech but doesn't protect you from the consequences the words you say might bring. I'm not saying it's right to threaten someone over something the say but, people tend to think they can say whatever they want without consequences because of the 4th amendment. Regardless whoever said this has absolutely no class.
originally posted by: geldib
The 4th Amendment does protect the freedom of speech but doesn't protect you from the consequences the words you say might bring. I'm not saying it's right to threaten someone over something the say but, people tend to think they can say whatever they want without consequences because of the 4th amendment. Regardless whoever said this has absolutely no class.
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects,[a] against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
originally posted by: geldib
The 4th Amendment does protect the freedom of speech but doesn't protect you from the consequences the words you say might bring. I'm not saying it's right to threaten someone over something the say but, people tend to think they can say whatever they want without consequences because of the 4th amendment. Regardless whoever said this has absolutely no class.